Comments on: Linky Goodness, November 2 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dining Tables http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-35966 Dining Tables Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:14:06 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html#comment-35966 Comcast surely deserves this. FCC should hopefully take such action that would show other wannabes that it does not pay. Comcast surely deserves this. FCC should hopefully take such action that would show other wannabes that it does not pay.

]]> By: Horisly http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-35938 Horisly Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:59:31 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html#comment-35938 concern on facebook's next pulse concern on facebook’s next pulse

]]> By: Conficio http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-35922 Conficio Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:19:50 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/11/linky-goodness-november-2.html#comment-35922 It's about time that someone goes after Net Neutrality violators. In my book it is not only the disruption of connections, the shaping of traffic according to their business interest (instead of network survival or QoS specified by one of the end-points), it is also the spam filtering or all the attempts to make e-mail (that is actually delivered) a paid premium service, and the port blocking/restrictions, or setting the entire network on a spamhouse list as dynamic IP addresses (what is dynamic about an IP that is an always on connection). It's about time we educate the local politicians, because all Internet access needs the last mile and a contract with the town or county you live in. Today they ask for money for town government IP networks and local access TV station funding. What would change if they demand Network Neutrality? It’s about time that someone goes after Net Neutrality violators. In my book it is not only the disruption of connections, the shaping of traffic according to their business interest (instead of network survival or QoS specified by one of the end-points), it is also the spam filtering or all the attempts to make e-mail (that is actually delivered) a paid premium service, and the port blocking/restrictions, or setting the entire network on a spamhouse list as dynamic IP addresses (what is dynamic about an IP that is an always on connection).

It’s about time we educate the local politicians, because all Internet access needs the last mile and a contract with the town or county you live in. Today they ask for money for town government IP networks and local access TV station funding. What would change if they demand Network Neutrality?

]]>