Comments on: Google Looking at Detection Technology? http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: BillC http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-64269 BillC Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:03:27 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-64269 There have been significant studies on the H3 detector "technology." (I leave it as an exercise for the reader to search the Internet for skeptical analyses.) To put it simply, it doesn't work as claimed - except as a fancy type of dowsing rod. Read the blurb carefully, and you will find that it is full of terminology that is scientifically incoherent! People have taken these apart in an attempt to reverse engineer it, and found it to be impossible -- you can't reverse engineer something that doesn't have any real working parts - it is just a hash of random electronic components slapped together. The U.S. Navy was duped into spending tons of money studying these devices (under various names) and found they are less effective than guessing. That's right -- in a double blind study, random guessing is proven to be more effective! Don't be taken in. Don't throw your money away. There have been significant studies on the H3 detector “technology.” (I leave it as an exercise for the reader to search the Internet for skeptical analyses.) To put it simply, it doesn’t work as claimed – except as a fancy type of dowsing rod. Read the blurb carefully, and you will find that it is full of terminology that is scientifically incoherent! People have taken these apart in an attempt to reverse engineer it, and found it to be impossible — you can’t reverse engineer something that doesn’t have any real working parts – it is just a hash of random electronic components slapped together. The U.S. Navy was duped into spending tons of money studying these devices (under various names) and found they are less effective than guessing. That’s right — in a double blind study, random guessing is proven to be more effective!
Don’t be taken in. Don’t throw your money away.

]]> By: H3 Tec http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37877 H3 Tec Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:28:24 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37877 MIT is very interested in this and there will be a 2 page article in their February publication. Look for it... MIT is very interested in this and there will be a 2 page article in their February publication. Look for it…

]]> By: H3 Tec http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37856 H3 Tec Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:52:17 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37856 With Zander leaving Moto, H3 has offered him a seat on the board. He didn't say no and he will make a decision after the 1st. Stranger things have happened. And yes this thing really works! With Zander leaving Moto, H3 has offered him a seat on the board. He didn’t say no and he will make a decision after the 1st. Stranger things have happened.

And yes this thing really works!

]]> By: Jordan Gunderson http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37846 Jordan Gunderson Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:50:26 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37846 This almost looks too good to be true. If it really does work, this could be one of the most disruptive technologies ever invented. This almost looks too good to be true. If it really does work, this could be one of the most disruptive technologies ever invented.

]]> By: RICKIE http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37836 RICKIE Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:34:59 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37836 KEEP ME INFORMED. KEEP ME INFORMED.

]]> By: Angel Investing, Entrepreneurship & Learning » Did you see this? http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37830 Angel Investing, Entrepreneurship & Learning » Did you see this? Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:05:20 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37830 [...] that have talked to Charles said that a lot more people than Ed ended up calling his cell phone; Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google), Steve Jobs (Apple), and others also called him expressing [...] [...] that have talked to Charles said that a lot more people than Ed ended up calling his cell phone; Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google), Steve Jobs (Apple), and others also called him expressing [...]

]]> By: miguel23 » Blog Archive » In The Future, Google Will Find YOU Anywhere. http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37829 miguel23 » Blog Archive » In The Future, Google Will Find YOU Anywhere. Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:02:33 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37829 [...] industry folks are discussing this topic after learning that Google is closely looking at H3TEC, a company that is [...] [...] industry folks are discussing this topic after learning that Google is closely looking at H3TEC, a company that is [...]

]]> By: Trek Passions http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37815 Trek Passions Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:53:57 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37815 OMG! A real life tricorder? Could anything be cooler? Seriously? Once they get past this BETA version and get a working 2.0 version, it's going to be amazing. You could use it to find girls...anywhere! Even when they are hiding behind rocks and things. Sweet! OMG! A real life tricorder? Could anything be cooler? Seriously? Once they get past this BETA version and get a working 2.0 version, it’s going to be amazing. You could use it to find girls…anywhere! Even when they are hiding behind rocks and things. Sweet!

]]> By: Jordan McCollum http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37774 Jordan McCollum Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:44:21 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37774 Fireworks are already regulated pretty extensively . . . where I live, they're only legal four weeks out of the year. Not sure where you're trying to go with that example. Fireworks are already regulated pretty extensively . . . where I live, they’re only legal four weeks out of the year. Not sure where you’re trying to go with that example.

]]> By: tired http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37768 tired Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:09:04 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37768 Another fear device? Im so sick of FEAR FEAR FEAR being crammed down our throats. What if that thing senses fireworks? Will they be banned? United States of Fear Detector(R). So basically this thing sends out frequencies that "activate" atoms based on their harmonic signature? Homeland security all over the world. WTF...? Another fear device? Im so sick of FEAR FEAR FEAR being crammed down our throats. What if that thing senses fireworks? Will they be banned? United States of Fear Detector(R). So basically this thing sends out frequencies that “activate” atoms based on their harmonic signature? Homeland security all over the world. WTF…?

]]> By: Steven Bradley http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37761 Steven Bradley Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:56:18 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37761 The demo video is pretty bad, but the technology is pretty cool. What would Google do with it? I suppose they'd develop the technology to detect spammers. Then googlers would wander the streets seeking to find spammers everywhere and rid the internet of them. The demo video is pretty bad, but the technology is pretty cool.

What would Google do with it? I suppose they’d develop the technology to detect spammers. Then googlers would wander the streets seeking to find spammers everywhere and rid the internet of them.

]]> By: The Opinionated Blogger http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-37738 The Opinionated Blogger Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:49:14 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2007/12/google-looking-at-detection-technology.html#comment-37738 This is a pretty interesting thought for a phone. However, I think we are going to need more technology to integrate the two successfully. They might use it to detect certain items, but not items like precious stones. That wouldn't really help society. Interesting post. This is a pretty interesting thought for a phone. However, I think we are going to need more technology to integrate the two successfully. They might use it to detect certain items, but not items like precious stones. That wouldn’t really help society.

Interesting post.

]]>