<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does AskEraser . . . Erase?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:19:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html/comment-page-1#comment-40349</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html#comment-40349</guid>
		<description>Yeah, seeing multiple stories on such similar topics on the same day prompted the Public? post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, seeing multiple stories on such similar topics on the same day prompted the Public? post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html/comment-page-1#comment-40337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html#comment-40337</guid>
		<description>I think this goes hand and hand with the &#039;Is the Internet ‘Public’?&#039; post. Once you step into the lobby...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this goes hand and hand with the &#8216;Is the Internet ‘Public’?&#8217; post. Once you step into the lobby&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html/comment-page-1#comment-40319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html#comment-40319</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nicholas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nicholas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html/comment-page-1#comment-40318</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/does-askeraser-erase.html#comment-40318</guid>
		<description>&quot;EPIC’s weekend filing regarding AskEraser is both flawed and unfortunate. It’s unfortunate in the sense that Ask.com tried to engage in a constructive dialogue with the group last week, and was rebuffed. Privacy is an issue that demands collaboration and partnership between online companies and advocates, for the benefit of all consumers. Ask.com’s relationship with the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology is proof-positive of that.

&quot;EPIC’s filing is flawed in the sense that the document they filed is factually inaccurate, and simply shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the functionality of our product. In addition, many of the issues they raise are outdated, while others are completely misguided from the outset, and others deal with changes that Ask.com already made to AskEraser weeks ago, and were subsequently posted publicly on our website.

&quot;It’s a shame that the industry’s first-ever privacy tool for consumers – widely acclaimed by industry experts and users alike - would be the subject of such a meritless action. It’s a move that sends a chilling message and has an adversarial effect to companies in the online space who would like to innovate on privacy to benefit users, but who might think twice based on wrongful and intimidating steps such as those taken by EPIC.&quot; 

- Nicholas Graham, Spokesperson, Ask.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;EPIC’s weekend filing regarding AskEraser is both flawed and unfortunate. It’s unfortunate in the sense that Ask.com tried to engage in a constructive dialogue with the group last week, and was rebuffed. Privacy is an issue that demands collaboration and partnership between online companies and advocates, for the benefit of all consumers. Ask.com’s relationship with the Center for Democracy &amp; Technology is proof-positive of that.</p>
<p>&#8220;EPIC’s filing is flawed in the sense that the document they filed is factually inaccurate, and simply shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the functionality of our product. In addition, many of the issues they raise are outdated, while others are completely misguided from the outset, and others deal with changes that Ask.com already made to AskEraser weeks ago, and were subsequently posted publicly on our website.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s a shame that the industry’s first-ever privacy tool for consumers – widely acclaimed by industry experts and users alike &#8211; would be the subject of such a meritless action. It’s a move that sends a chilling message and has an adversarial effect to companies in the online space who would like to innovate on privacy to benefit users, but who might think twice based on wrongful and intimidating steps such as those taken by EPIC.&#8221; </p>
<p>- Nicholas Graham, Spokesperson, Ask.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
