<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only 200 Advertisers Sign on for Google TV Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:40:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fintsomsnus - Jonathan Forster&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-02-07</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-41117</link>
		<dc:creator>Fintsomsnus - Jonathan Forster&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2008-02-07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-41117</guid>
		<description>[...] Only 200 Advertisers Sign on for Google TV Ads While even Google Radio has about 1,600 advertisers, Google TV advertising currently counts around 200. (tags: google radio) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Only 200 Advertisers Sign on for Google TV Ads While even Google Radio has about 1,600 advertisers, Google TV advertising currently counts around 200. (tags: google radio) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40739</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40739</guid>
		<description>TV Ads does not seem a likely growth point for a company like google. I still do not get how they are planning to put the system to work. Just 200 signups further proves people aren&#039;t very comfortable with the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV Ads does not seem a likely growth point for a company like google. I still do not get how they are planning to put the system to work. Just 200 signups further proves people aren&#8217;t very comfortable with the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40726</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40726</guid>
		<description>Ya, 200 is unbelievably low. Google is not really synonymous with traditional media though so that should be interesting to see where that goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, 200 is unbelievably low. Google is not really synonymous with traditional media though so that should be interesting to see where that goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40718</guid>
		<description>Tim,

I agree - I think they&#039;d do better focusing on local television. There aren&#039;t too many companies actively looking for new ad agencies that advertise nationally. 

200 is awful. I can&#039;t believe Google couldn&#039;t drum up more business than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>I agree &#8211; I think they&#8217;d do better focusing on local television. There aren&#8217;t too many companies actively looking for new ad agencies that advertise nationally. </p>
<p>200 is awful. I can&#8217;t believe Google couldn&#8217;t drum up more business than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Madel</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40693</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Madel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40693</guid>
		<description>I think the real reason TV ads haven&#039;t taken off yet is because ads are only available on dish Network.  I don&#039;t know the penetration numbers, but  I think it is somewhere around 13 million households.  

Because the ads will appear nationally, I think is a huge disadvantage for Google.  A natural target for all of Google marketing efforts (search, content, print and radio) is the local market.  Having a product that is national in scope is dis-congruous.  Especially when competing against cable systems who can offer highly targeted TV ads and have a local sales force to hammer the point home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real reason TV ads haven&#8217;t taken off yet is because ads are only available on dish Network.  I don&#8217;t know the penetration numbers, but  I think it is somewhere around 13 million households.  </p>
<p>Because the ads will appear nationally, I think is a huge disadvantage for Google.  A natural target for all of Google marketing efforts (search, content, print and radio) is the local market.  Having a product that is national in scope is dis-congruous.  Especially when competing against cable systems who can offer highly targeted TV ads and have a local sales force to hammer the point home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40674</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40674</guid>
		<description>@Janet - I think Google&#039;s recent partnerships suggest that its trying hard to push Google TV. They almost have to make it work, otherwise Wall Street will sense that Google will only ever be a one-trick pony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Janet &#8211; I think Google&#8217;s recent partnerships suggest that its trying hard to push Google TV. They almost have to make it work, otherwise Wall Street will sense that Google will only ever be a one-trick pony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Meiners</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-40673</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Meiners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/only-200-advertisers-sign-on-for-google-tv-ads.html#comment-40673</guid>
		<description>Andy,
Thanks for the stats straight from Google. That is pretty poor performance. You&#039;d think they&#039;d market Google TV more aggressively, perhaps with Google TV, Radio, or Print ads. Or through partnerships with agencies. They seem to assume everyone is online.

I&#039;m trying to find out how long has Google TV been out of invite-only beta. 

I&#039;m curious how their newspaper ads, Google Print, are doing. They seem to be putting a lot of effort into it (with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/google-print-to-add-bar-codes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google ad bar codes&lt;/a&gt;) when reports are that it&#039;s not going that well either. I wonder how the numbers compare to Google TV and Google Radio. 

-Janet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,<br />
Thanks for the stats straight from Google. That is pretty poor performance. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d market Google TV more aggressively, perhaps with Google TV, Radio, or Print ads. Or through partnerships with agencies. They seem to assume everyone is online.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to find out how long has Google TV been out of invite-only beta. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious how their newspaper ads, Google Print, are doing. They seem to be putting a lot of effort into it (with <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/01/google-print-to-add-bar-codes.html" rel="nofollow">Google ad bar codes</a>) when reports are that it&#8217;s not going that well either. I wonder how the numbers compare to Google TV and Google Radio. </p>
<p>-Janet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
