<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Up for Grabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41844</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41844</guid>
		<description>Bewkes&#039; comment about the valuation of AOL is slightly rediculous.  AOL and Yahoo can not be compared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bewkes&#8217; comment about the valuation of AOL is slightly rediculous.  AOL and Yahoo can not be compared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41584</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41584</guid>
		<description>AOL has been digging its own grave since 2000.  I blame it on lack of reputable and innovtive upper management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL has been digging its own grave since 2000.  I blame it on lack of reputable and innovtive upper management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41170</guid>
		<description>Wow, do we finally get to see the fall of AOHell?  I doubt it will fold completely, but I&#039;m glad to see that they are struggling... an AOL free internet is a better internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, do we finally get to see the fall of AOHell?  I doubt it will fold completely, but I&#8217;m glad to see that they are struggling&#8230; an AOL free internet is a better internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile guy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41147</guid>
		<description>What they gonna do with theirs IM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they gonna do with theirs IM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciaran</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41143</guid>
		<description>&quot;some of the reasons that Time Warner is shedding the company it acquired eight years ago&quot;

Of course the truly amazing thing about all of this, especially when you look at the companies now, is that AOL acquired Time Warner, not the other way round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;some of the reasons that Time Warner is shedding the company it acquired eight years ago&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course the truly amazing thing about all of this, especially when you look at the companies now, is that AOL acquired Time Warner, not the other way round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41120</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41120</guid>
		<description>I hear you Jayson, though it&#039;s not like there&#039;s a lot of competition even now. Most of the time it seems like it&#039;s Google and...umm...some other search engines.

I do agree with you that we could use more competition instead of less. Will a joint Microsoft/Yahoo be able to compete better with Google than they could separately? Maybe, maybe not.

I&#039;m not sure AOL going away will make much difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Jayson, though it&#8217;s not like there&#8217;s a lot of competition even now. Most of the time it seems like it&#8217;s Google and&#8230;umm&#8230;some other search engines.</p>
<p>I do agree with you that we could use more competition instead of less. Will a joint Microsoft/Yahoo be able to compete better with Google than they could separately? Maybe, maybe not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure AOL going away will make much difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html/comment-page-1#comment-41080</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/aol-up-for-grabs.html#comment-41080</guid>
		<description>All this talk about selling search engines and merging etc. has me worried about the future of search engines. No competition means less innovation and it looks like it&#039;s going to be easier now for the Internet to become as expensive as every other communication medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this talk about selling search engines and merging etc. has me worried about the future of search engines. No competition means less innovation and it looks like it&#8217;s going to be easier now for the Internet to become as expensive as every other communication medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

