<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft &#8220;reserves the right&#8221; to Make a Hostile Bid for Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-41666</link>
		<dc:creator>F.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html#comment-41666</guid>
		<description>Microsoft seems to think it rules the world. Everytime Microsoft gets involved with a company, I stop using that company. My son says technology is satan&#039;s way of destroying the world, and Microsoft is the anti-christ.  Funny, but maybe too true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft seems to think it rules the world. Everytime Microsoft gets involved with a company, I stop using that company. My son says technology is satan&#8217;s way of destroying the world, and Microsoft is the anti-christ.  Funny, but maybe too true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rothardt</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-41423</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rothardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html#comment-41423</guid>
		<description>I have difficulty believing this merger would be good for competition in the search engine marketplace. Reducing the number of players in the market does not in and of itself make things better. MSFT has sought to consolidate other markets in the past and has essentially monopolized some of those markets. That has not been all good for the markets they control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have difficulty believing this merger would be good for competition in the search engine marketplace. Reducing the number of players in the market does not in and of itself make things better. MSFT has sought to consolidate other markets in the past and has essentially monopolized some of those markets. That has not been all good for the markets they control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html/comment-page-1#comment-41358</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-make-a-hostile-bid-for-yahoo.html#comment-41358</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has been pretty clear they aren&#039;t planning on taking no for an answer since this began. Is it Microsoft arrogance or will they eventually get their &#039;yes&#039; one way or another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has been pretty clear they aren&#8217;t planning on taking no for an answer since this began. Is it Microsoft arrogance or will they eventually get their &#8216;yes&#8217; one way or another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

