<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Internal Letter: We&#8217;re Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html/comment-page-1#comment-41159</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html#comment-41159</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think they&#039;d hold out this long.  But it appears that Yahoo believes that it can survive on its own. We&#039;ll see how it pans out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think they&#8217;d hold out this long.  But it appears that Yahoo believes that it can survive on its own. We&#8217;ll see how it pans out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html/comment-page-1#comment-41146</link>
		<dc:creator>Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html#comment-41146</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;ll sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;ll sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html/comment-page-1#comment-41124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html#comment-41124</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how long Microsoft will let them think; do they have a choice? It seems like Microsoft&#039;s main motivation is the brand name and there&#039;s no other search engine with such a strong brand name. 

It&#039;s nice to see that Yahoo isn&#039;t just jumping into the deal and that they could hold off on their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how long Microsoft will let them think; do they have a choice? It seems like Microsoft&#8217;s main motivation is the brand name and there&#8217;s no other search engine with such a strong brand name. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see that Yahoo isn&#8217;t just jumping into the deal and that they could hold off on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html/comment-page-1#comment-41121</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/02/yahoo-internal-letter-were-thinking.html#comment-41121</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kind of funny. Yahoo appears to be doing everything it can to keep the deal from happening and remain an independent company, while Microsoft is proceeding as if it&#039;s already happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of funny. Yahoo appears to be doing everything it can to keep the deal from happening and remain an independent company, while Microsoft is proceeding as if it&#8217;s already happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

