<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Loses Wireless Auction, But Wins Anyway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-bone</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html/comment-page-1#comment-53008</link>
		<dc:creator>t-bone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html#comment-53008</guid>
		<description>Are you guys for real?  Google has 13.6 billion in reserves.   If they wanted the 700Mhz band they&#039;d have it now.  It sold for 9.6 billion.  Google doesn&#039;t want to be in the carrier/provider business.  I think we all can agree they are pretty successful in their current business model.  Google and the other members of the Open Handset Alliance lobbied the FCC heavily that 4 requirements be placed on the  bandwidth: open applications, open devices, open services, and open networks.  FCC adopted 2 of them IF it sold for over 4.6 billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you guys for real?  Google has 13.6 billion in reserves.   If they wanted the 700Mhz band they&#8217;d have it now.  It sold for 9.6 billion.  Google doesn&#8217;t want to be in the carrier/provider business.  I think we all can agree they are pretty successful in their current business model.  Google and the other members of the Open Handset Alliance lobbied the FCC heavily that 4 requirements be placed on the  bandwidth: open applications, open devices, open services, and open networks.  FCC adopted 2 of them IF it sold for over 4.6 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prosperity Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html/comment-page-1#comment-43979</link>
		<dc:creator>Prosperity Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 03:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html#comment-43979</guid>
		<description>its called &quot;sour graping&quot; folks. maybe its hard for big shots like google to accept defeat or being out done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its called &#8220;sour graping&#8221; folks. maybe its hard for big shots like google to accept defeat or being out done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PS3</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html/comment-page-1#comment-43855</link>
		<dc:creator>PS3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html#comment-43855</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve all said &quot;we didn&#039;t want it anyway&quot; after a heavy defeat.  Reminds me of being back in the school yard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve all said &#8220;we didn&#8217;t want it anyway&#8221; after a heavy defeat.  Reminds me of being back in the school yard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html/comment-page-1#comment-43847</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-loses-wireless-auction-but-wins-anyway.html#comment-43847</guid>
		<description>Do we really think that AT&amp;T and Verizon are bothered by the fact they have to pretend to adhere to some loosely enforceable conditions crafted by an FCC they&#039;ve effectively run for the last decade?

I do take issue with this continuing meme that a Google loss was really a &quot;win&quot;....

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Google-The-Wireless-Tease-92842</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we really think that AT&amp;T and Verizon are bothered by the fact they have to pretend to adhere to some loosely enforceable conditions crafted by an FCC they&#8217;ve effectively run for the last decade?</p>
<p>I do take issue with this continuing meme that a Google loss was really a &#8220;win&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Google-The-Wireless-Tease-92842</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

