<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Welcomes Yahoo to OpenSocial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Pandia Weekend Wrap-Up March 30 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-44323</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Pandia Weekend Wrap-Up March 30 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html#comment-44323</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Welcomes Yahoo to OpenSocial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Welcomes Yahoo to OpenSocial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-44214</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/google-welcomes-yahoo-to-opensocial.html#comment-44214</guid>
		<description>I can understand why Facebook would prefer to stick with their own API, but in time I would think developers will spend their time learning the API that gives them more bang for their buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand why Facebook would prefer to stick with their own API, but in time I would think developers will spend their time learning the API that gives them more bang for their buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

