<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Shareholders Attempt to Force Company Policy Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prosperity Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-44263</link>
		<dc:creator>Prosperity Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html#comment-44263</guid>
		<description>nobody wants their stocks falling :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody wants their stocks falling <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile guy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-44228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html#comment-44228</guid>
		<description>Looks like shareholders don&#039;t like stocks falling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like shareholders don&#8217;t like stocks falling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Futon-Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-44219</link>
		<dc:creator>Futon-Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html#comment-44219</guid>
		<description>This will be interesting to watch pan out.  I&#039;m sure nothing will happen, but I enjoy watching Google in the hot seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be interesting to watch pan out.  I&#8217;m sure nothing will happen, but I enjoy watching Google in the hot seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-44194</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/03/googles-shareholders-attempt-to-force-company-policy-changes.html#comment-44194</guid>
		<description>&quot;Force&quot; changes?   Hmmm - this is how corporate policy can be changed in a rational way. The shareholders own the company, not the board!

Athough Google could make a case that the censorship changes could hurt business, the recommendation to avoid a human rights committee is, in a word, unconscionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Force&#8221; changes?   Hmmm &#8211; this is how corporate policy can be changed in a rational way. The shareholders own the company, not the board!</p>
<p>Athough Google could make a case that the censorship changes could hurt business, the recommendation to avoid a human rights committee is, in a word, unconscionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

