Comments on: Flickr Launches Video Hosting

By: Catherine

Catherine — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:10:57 +0000

Yes. No doubt youtube is still my favorite. Why would anyone pay for a service and there is better service for free. Catherine's last blog post..The Truth About Getting Great Abs

By: Spencer

Spencer — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:50:56 +0000

That's cool. But with so much happening in the area of using video to market product, has anyone started a site where you can get stock video to use? You know like the way the PLR sites let you sign-up and use their content. Spencer's last blog post..Affiliate Marketing Writing Tips

By: Seomotion

Seomotion — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:37:54 +0000

Youtube is the best now. But Flickr service is good for those countries – where Youtube is blocked.

By: id

id — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:53:07 +0000

Well, youtube is still the best for video storage,

By: Elections guy

Elections guy — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:26:52 +0000

I а no one can upload video to Yahoo, why would they start this service?

By: Tiffany

Tiffany — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:03:40 +0000

Yeah I think the Pro license cost is not reasonable…I think they should review about this. It affects people interest.

By: Paul Baranda

Paul Baranda — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:09:56 +0000

Though I disagree with the payment model that Flickr is using for uploading videos, I do understand that they are certainly not owned by Google, nor have the funding to allow such bandwidth that video can eat up.

By: id

id — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:31:59 +0000

Why would i pay $25 to upload only 90 sec videos, there is no point of this I like the flicker for photos, but file size of videos are really limited.

By: Andy Beal

Andy Beal — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:19:00 +0000

Here’s my thought on this limit. Flickr anticipates that the videos will be the kind you take with your digital camera–you know the “movie mode”short clips–hence, they want the videos you film alongside your photos, not your Hollywood productions.

By: Search Engine Optimization Journal

Search Engine Optimization Journal — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:46:14 +0000

Agreeing with Stuart, why would anyone pay for 90 second video hosting when there are plenty of free ones for much bigger files? There must be some sort of extra bonuses we simply don’t know about.

By: Stuart Marsh

Stuart Marsh — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:09:31 +0000

The question is whether users will stump up the $25 to post 90 second videos, when they can do 10 minute vids for free on YouTube and others?

Stuart