<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Solutions; Closer Scrutiny or More Poor Decisions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45336</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45336</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the follow up post Roderick. Not quite as nefarious as this story first appeared, but still NS should realize they&#039;re going to be under scrutiny after the last go round.

Their brand is quickly eroding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the follow up post Roderick. Not quite as nefarious as this story first appeared, but still NS should realize they&#8217;re going to be under scrutiny after the last go round.</p>
<p>Their brand is quickly eroding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Ioerger</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45221</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick Ioerger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45221</guid>
		<description>Ars Technica has a really good follow up to this story that is worth reading.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080410-keeping-network-solutions-from-cashing-in-on-your-subdomains.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ars Technica has a really good follow up to this story that is worth reading.</p>
<p>http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080410-keeping-network-solution s-from-cashing-in-on-your-subdomains.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45210</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45210</guid>
		<description>i wish i had the time to go into all the foolish and shady practices they are engaging in overthere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wish i had the time to go into all the foolish and shady practices they are engaging in overthere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45195</link>
		<dc:creator>Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45195</guid>
		<description>Wow.  When the domain tasting thing came out, I thought, &quot;Could they be any shadier?&quot;  I guess I have my answer now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  When the domain tasting thing came out, I thought, &#8220;Could they be any shadier?&#8221;  I guess I have my answer now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45118</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45118</guid>
		<description>they still charge 35 bucks per year for domains, even register.com lowered their prices.  

im glad godaddy stole soo much of their market share.  what a failure to innovate and adapt to the changing environment.  

and the only reason i know they still charge 35, is because i still have one domain there which is used for nameservers, so i dont want to risk interrupting a dozen sites with a domain transfer.  

netsol, what happened? u used to be the industry standard...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they still charge 35 bucks per year for domains, even register.com lowered their prices.  </p>
<p>im glad godaddy stole soo much of their market share.  what a failure to innovate and adapt to the changing environment.  </p>
<p>and the only reason i know they still charge 35, is because i still have one domain there which is used for nameservers, so i dont want to risk interrupting a dozen sites with a domain transfer.  </p>
<p>netsol, what happened? u used to be the industry standard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Baranda</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Baranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45112</guid>
		<description>They are sinking lower and lower.  I still want justice against their domain tasting practices.  They are one of the reasons that many 2-word domains are not available.  Once the final ruling is given by ICANN about their domain tasting evil...hopefully it will free up many domains again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are sinking lower and lower.  I still want justice against their domain tasting practices.  They are one of the reasons that many 2-word domains are not available.  Once the final ruling is given by ICANN about their domain tasting evil&#8230;hopefully it will free up many domains again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NextInstinct</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45109</link>
		<dc:creator>NextInstinct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45109</guid>
		<description>Someone is trying to manage NetSol into the ground. 
The offenses are serious and non-stop, in an age where transparency wins. 

Their actions are baffling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone is trying to manage NetSol into the ground.<br />
The offenses are serious and non-stop, in an age where transparency wins. </p>
<p>Their actions are baffling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elections guy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html/comment-page-1#comment-45094</link>
		<dc:creator>Elections guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/network-solutions-closer-scrutiny-or-more-poor-decisions.html#comment-45094</guid>
		<description>I think domain owners have rights to brign a suit against Network Solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think domain owners have rights to brign a suit against Network Solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

