<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merchants Ban Affiliates Based on New York Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing News Roundup, January 14</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-66012</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing News Roundup, January 14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-66012</guid>
		<description>[...] A New York court dismissed Amazon&#8217;s objections to paying state taxes, filed after the New York law passed back in May. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A New York court dismissed Amazon&#8217;s objections to paying state taxes, filed after the New York law passed back in May. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony.P</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-57053</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-57053</guid>
		<description>thats bad, I would not do business there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats bad, I would not do business there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Destiny@Freebeezndealz.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-55886</link>
		<dc:creator>Destiny@Freebeezndealz.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-55886</guid>
		<description>And this is a surprise?

&lt;em&gt;Destiny@Freebeezndealz.com&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreebeezAndDealz/~3/EqJHwtDgEcw/free-4-pack-of-goody-hair-elastics.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free 4 pack of Goody hair elastics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is a surprise?</p>
<p><em>Destiny@Freebeezndealz.com&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreebeezAndDealz/~3/EqJHwtDgEcw/free-4-pack-of-goody-hair-elastics.html' rel="nofollow">Free 4 pack of Goody hair elastics</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making SEO Google</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-52703</link>
		<dc:creator>Making SEO Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-52703</guid>
		<description>very Good !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very Good !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO FAQ</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-50159</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO FAQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-50159</guid>
		<description>I see some responses with links to websites. How do I put a link in my responses?

&lt;em&gt;SEO FAQ&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://swf.lt/2008/05/rss-feed-directory.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RSS feed Directory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see some responses with links to websites. How do I put a link in my responses?</p>
<p><em>SEO FAQ&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://swf.lt/2008/05/rss-feed-directory.html' rel="nofollow">RSS feed Directory</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Ioerger</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-48541</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick Ioerger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-48541</guid>
		<description>NY is going to lose more in income tax than they will ever earn with illconceived laws like this.  Their short term greed is getting in the way of their long term greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY is going to lose more in income tax than they will ever earn with illconceived laws like this.  Their short term greed is getting in the way of their long term greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brick Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-48537</link>
		<dc:creator>Brick Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-48537</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re surprised something like this hasn&#039;t happened sooner -- it will be interesting to see if other states take after New York&#039;s lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re surprised something like this hasn&#8217;t happened sooner &#8212; it will be interesting to see if other states take after New York&#8217;s lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-48517</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-48517</guid>
		<description>There is a continual misunderstanding of the implications of this law including on this post.  If a merchant has an affiliate in New York, and if the merchant has over $10,000 in sales FROM NEW YORK RESIDENTS (not from New York residents using affiliate links), then the merchant has to collect sales tax ON ALL NEW YORK SALES (not just those from affiliate links).  

Another point - that if the affiliates do no solicitation the merchant is off the hook ignores the reality that an affiliate can do anything they want to, including direct email contact with New York residents, without the merchant&#039;s approval.  Even if the merchant then kicked out the affiliate the next day the marketing already took place and therefore nexus was created.

The only safe route for a merchant that has New York affiliates and New York sales over $10,000 is to remove all New York affiliates from their program until such time as the law is overturned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a continual misunderstanding of the implications of this law including on this post.  If a merchant has an affiliate in New York, and if the merchant has over $10,000 in sales FROM NEW YORK RESIDENTS (not from New York residents using affiliate links), then the merchant has to collect sales tax ON ALL NEW YORK SALES (not just those from affiliate links).  </p>
<p>Another point &#8211; that if the affiliates do no solicitation the merchant is off the hook ignores the reality that an affiliate can do anything they want to, including direct email contact with New York residents, without the merchant&#8217;s approval.  Even if the merchant then kicked out the affiliate the next day the marketing already took place and therefore nexus was created.</p>
<p>The only safe route for a merchant that has New York affiliates and New York sales over $10,000 is to remove all New York affiliates from their program until such time as the law is overturned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoTax</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-48472</link>
		<dc:creator>NoTax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-48472</guid>
		<description>The Democrats will tax everyone to death. I can&#039;t understand why anyone wants a Democrat for President. I guess people love paying more taxes all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats will tax everyone to death. I can&#8217;t understand why anyone wants a Democrat for President. I guess people love paying more taxes all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/merchants-ban-affiliates-based-on-new-york-tax.html/comment-page-1#comment-48470</link>
		<dc:creator>CT Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5308#comment-48470</guid>
		<description>I fear that this just might be the beginning of a trend. It&#039;s rare that governments let entrepreneurs go untaxed for very long.

I think, then, the future of affiliate marketing lies with software that can help networks and their affiliate easily manage such taxation. Some networks already do this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=670&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=670&lt;/a&gt;.

Essentially, as affiliate tax becomes the norm, affiliate are going to seek out networks that take care of the paper work for them (like employers deduct income tax off your pay check for employees). Consequently, affiliate networks will need to develop software that can group affiliates according to location and deduct the relevant taxes from their earnings.

It&#039;s really going to be an accountant&#039;s dream. The real nightmare is going to be in accurate reporting.

&lt;em&gt;CT Moore&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://blog.incomeaccess.com/?p=519&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;9 Ways to Get More Links&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear that this just might be the beginning of a trend. It&#8217;s rare that governments let entrepreneurs go untaxed for very long.</p>
<p>I think, then, the future of affiliate marketing lies with software that can help networks and their affiliate easily manage such taxation. Some networks already do this: <a href="http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=670" rel="nofollow">http://blog.shareresults.com/?p=670</a>.</p>
<p>Essentially, as affiliate tax becomes the norm, affiliate are going to seek out networks that take care of the paper work for them (like employers deduct income tax off your pay check for employees). Consequently, affiliate networks will need to develop software that can group affiliates according to location and deduct the relevant taxes from their earnings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really going to be an accountant&#8217;s dream. The real nightmare is going to be in accurate reporting.</p>
<p><em>CT Moore&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://blog.incomeaccess.com/?p=519' rel="nofollow">9 Ways to Get More Links</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

