<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Google Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:46:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-57138</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-57138</guid>
		<description>I just meant about the in house thing, as I manage an in house team.

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;80’s Birthday Cake&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just meant about the in house thing, as I manage an in house team.</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html' rel="nofollow">80’s Birthday Cake</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cibula</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-57063</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cibula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-57063</guid>
		<description>Terry,

We&#039;re getting there. In other words, I think we&#039;re talking about the same thing: Example: With InverSearch, a business owner only pays (currently) $.99 when THEY CHOOSE to respond to a consumer inquiry (which comes to them in advance via [and because of] the categories they picked when they signed up). CPA is not better than that. And I&#039;m really not biased. BTW, why are you biased?

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,</p>
<p>We&#8217;re getting there. In other words, I think we&#8217;re talking about the same thing: Example: With InverSearch, a business owner only pays (currently) $.99 when THEY CHOOSE to respond to a consumer inquiry (which comes to them in advance via [and because of] the categories they picked when they signed up). CPA is not better than that. And I&#8217;m really not biased. BTW, why are you biased?</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-56795</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-56795</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, &quot;cost per acquisition&quot; is a metric, not a payment model. Pay-per-action is not PPC, as you don&#039;t pay for any clicks.

I think I see that what you are describing with the service is paid lead gen, which usually if the agreement is written correctly does not require the recipient to pay for poor quality leads.

I have to disagree still that the future is pay-per-response, because sometimes people&#039;s matriculation rate on leads can be over a year. As well, when you need a certain volume of leads and nobody knows your audience and what a good lead better than yourself, then nothing ever beats having talented in house people optimizing and improving lead flow and CPL (CPA) on a daily basis. THAT is the future of search (but then again I&#039;m biased)

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;80’s Birthday Cake&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, &#8220;cost per acquisition&#8221; is a metric, not a payment model. Pay-per-action is not PPC, as you don&#8217;t pay for any clicks.</p>
<p>I think I see that what you are describing with the service is paid lead gen, which usually if the agreement is written correctly does not require the recipient to pay for poor quality leads.</p>
<p>I have to disagree still that the future is pay-per-response, because sometimes people&#8217;s matriculation rate on leads can be over a year. As well, when you need a certain volume of leads and nobody knows your audience and what a good lead better than yourself, then nothing ever beats having talented in house people optimizing and improving lead flow and CPL (CPA) on a daily basis. THAT is the future of search (but then again I&#8217;m biased)</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html' rel="nofollow">80’s Birthday Cake</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cibula</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-56776</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cibula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-56776</guid>
		<description>Cost per acquisition or cost per action are not pay per response. They&#039;re both still pay per click. And you&#039;re right, they both suck. They both failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cost per acquisition or cost per action are not pay per response. They&#8217;re both still pay per click. And you&#8217;re right, they both suck. They both failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-56747</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-56747</guid>
		<description>http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=97264

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;80’s Birthday Cake&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=97264" rel="nofollow">http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=97264</a></p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/80s-birthday-cake.html' rel="nofollow">80’s Birthday Cake</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cibula</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-56731</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cibula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-56731</guid>
		<description>Terry,

How can I contact you to gain some more insight into your response above? Through your blog?

BTW, I see nowhere Google or anyone else ever tried a real pay per resonse model.

Thanks

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,</p>
<p>How can I contact you to gain some more insight into your response above? Through your blog?</p>
<p>BTW, I see nowhere Google or anyone else ever tried a real pay per resonse model.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-55958</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-55958</guid>
		<description>Google already did pay per response and it sucked out loud. It sounds good in theory but the true quality of a response cannot be systematically measured outside of the e-commerce space. In lead gen the matriculation period could be up to a year or more and quality control points to the depth that they SHOULD be measured would never be accepted by such services. There is too much form spam to allow an automated approach to that.

The methodology is observing your traffic sources and the leads they generate according to your own standards and revising your keywords and budget allocation accordingly is a human&#039;s only club, no machine will ever be able to do it as well.

Your comment spam though might be helpful to people with e-commerce based sites though.

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/brevard-county-set-to-charge-fire.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brevard County Set to Charge Fire Rescue Fees&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google already did pay per response and it sucked out loud. It sounds good in theory but the true quality of a response cannot be systematically measured outside of the e-commerce space. In lead gen the matriculation period could be up to a year or more and quality control points to the depth that they SHOULD be measured would never be accepted by such services. There is too much form spam to allow an automated approach to that.</p>
<p>The methodology is observing your traffic sources and the leads they generate according to your own standards and revising your keywords and budget allocation accordingly is a human&#8217;s only club, no machine will ever be able to do it as well.</p>
<p>Your comment spam though might be helpful to people with e-commerce based sites though.</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2008/09/brevard-county-set-to-charge-fire.html' rel="nofollow">Brevard County Set to Charge Fire Rescue Fees</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cibula</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-55957</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cibula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-55957</guid>
		<description>New Search Engine Immune to Click Fraud

InverSearch is a search engine that bills its business users by the number of responses they make to consumer inquiries rather than by the number of hits they receive. InverSearch has moved completely away from the pay-per-click business model that currently dominates the search industry. The future of search is pay-per-response, which does not affect the relevancy of search results or devour advertisers’ budgets.

Consumers and businesses alike sign up for InverSearch accounts; consumer accounts are available free of charge, while businesses pay only per response to the bona fide leads the site delivers to them. Once consumers create their accounts, they can create confidential inquiries for the products and services they need and submit the inquiries to businesses globally, locally or anywhere in between. The inquiries are delivered via the InverSearch user interface to InverSearch business users, who can choose whether to respond directly, or to ignore consumer inquiries that do not interest them, paying only for the responses they actually make.

InverSearch inverts the roles of the parties involved in a traditional search – the inquirer and the recipient, or the consumer and the business. In many respects, InverSearch is like a dating service, matching consumers with needs to businesses with solutions. It’s the beginning of a paradigm shift from the burden of searching being placed on the consumer. Since businesses already respond to consumer inquiries that come from conventional business advertising, InverSearch integrates seamlessly with the advertising businesses are already doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Search Engine Immune to Click Fraud</p>
<p>InverSearch is a search engine that bills its business users by the number of responses they make to consumer inquiries rather than by the number of hits they receive. InverSearch has moved completely away from the pay-per-click business model that currently dominates the search industry. The future of search is pay-per-response, which does not affect the relevancy of search results or devour advertisers’ budgets.</p>
<p>Consumers and businesses alike sign up for InverSearch accounts; consumer accounts are available free of charge, while businesses pay only per response to the bona fide leads the site delivers to them. Once consumers create their accounts, they can create confidential inquiries for the products and services they need and submit the inquiries to businesses globally, locally or anywhere in between. The inquiries are delivered via the InverSearch user interface to InverSearch business users, who can choose whether to respond directly, or to ignore consumer inquiries that do not interest them, paying only for the responses they actually make.</p>
<p>InverSearch inverts the roles of the parties involved in a traditional search – the inquirer and the recipient, or the consumer and the business. In many respects, InverSearch is like a dating service, matching consumers with needs to businesses with solutions. It’s the beginning of a paradigm shift from the burden of searching being placed on the consumer. Since businesses already respond to consumer inquiries that come from conventional business advertising, InverSearch integrates seamlessly with the advertising businesses are already doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIchard Srery</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-50993</link>
		<dc:creator>RIchard Srery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-50993</guid>
		<description>I think in the end Goole may be the next Real Google Killer.

Richard P. Srery
Operations, Logistics &amp; Engagement Management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the end Goole may be the next Real Google Killer.</p>
<p>Richard P. Srery<br />
Operations, Logistics &amp; Engagement Management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-49740</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-49740</guid>
		<description>When Steven Jobs announces a new version (iPhone) the world listens and speaks about.
When Google launches yet-another-Beta it hardly gets noticed.

So who is in control for PR ? Steven Jobs.

When Amazon launched EC2, many of us felt the need to sign up.
When Google launched Google Labs, it was yet another showcase of their imagination without a purpose.

Currently Search is used one by one: you search something and you copy it in a documents: a collage
When the semantic web will be available, we will no longer need old fashioned Google.
Video killed the radio star.
MP3 killed the CD.
... killed Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Steven Jobs announces a new version (iPhone) the world listens and speaks about.<br />
When Google launches yet-another-Beta it hardly gets noticed.</p>
<p>So who is in control for PR ? Steven Jobs.</p>
<p>When Amazon launched EC2, many of us felt the need to sign up.<br />
When Google launched Google Labs, it was yet another showcase of their imagination without a purpose.</p>
<p>Currently Search is used one by one: you search something and you copy it in a documents: a collage<br />
When the semantic web will be available, we will no longer need old fashioned Google.<br />
Video killed the radio star.<br />
MP3 killed the CD.<br />
&#8230; killed Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-48535</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-48535</guid>
		<description>Well, Google is indeed getting very big and I agree that it may one day collapse under its own achivement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Google is indeed getting very big and I agree that it may one day collapse under its own achivement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-48534</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-48534</guid>
		<description>Great one.  After reading what you said, I do agree with you that Google could prove to be its own greatest enemy.

&lt;em&gt;Tony&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.investmenthealthinsurance.com/who-want-very-good-car-insurance.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Who Want Very Good Car Insurance?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great one.  After reading what you said, I do agree with you that Google could prove to be its own greatest enemy.</p>
<p><em>Tony&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.investmenthealthinsurance.com/who-want-very-good-car-insurance.html' rel="nofollow">Who Want Very Good Car Insurance?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musashi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-48105</link>
		<dc:creator>Musashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-48105</guid>
		<description>For the next 5 years google will be very hard to crack. Their position in advertising is unique. The only danger comes from the big publishers grouping together to make their own pay-per-click Advertising network. As long as publishers still use the old pay-per-view model google can sleep calmly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the next 5 years google will be very hard to crack. Their position in advertising is unique. The only danger comes from the big publishers grouping together to make their own pay-per-click Advertising network. As long as publishers still use the old pay-per-view model google can sleep calmly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jatt</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-48038</link>
		<dc:creator>jatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-48038</guid>
		<description>Nice post you have there. I agree that google monopoly would someday become a burden to theirself. But, however, google rocks!

&lt;em&gt;jatt&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://adsensetoplist.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-11-information-marketing-business.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 11 Information  Marketing Business Mistakes to Avoid&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post you have there. I agree that google monopoly would someday become a burden to theirself. But, however, google rocks!</p>
<p><em>jatt&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://adsensetoplist.blogspot.com/2008/05/top-11-information-marketing-business.html' rel="nofollow">Top 11 Information  Marketing Business Mistakes to Avoid</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt S.</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47894</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47894</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter where Google&#039;s revenue comes from, in terms of this article.

I think the point is that eventually Google will get so BIG that it will be logistically impossible to manage everything that is going on, and to keep things running as efficiently as it has been.

There won&#039;t be a replacement for their Sponsored ads - there may be good competition, but they will not get replaced until the whole computing interface changes drastically. 

... and one last thing to keep in mind - Arguing on the Internet is like being in the Special Olympics... even if you win, you&#039;re still retarded.

Mattski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter where Google&#8217;s revenue comes from, in terms of this article.</p>
<p>I think the point is that eventually Google will get so BIG that it will be logistically impossible to manage everything that is going on, and to keep things running as efficiently as it has been.</p>
<p>There won&#8217;t be a replacement for their Sponsored ads &#8211; there may be good competition, but they will not get replaced until the whole computing interface changes drastically. </p>
<p>&#8230; and one last thing to keep in mind &#8211; Arguing on the Internet is like being in the Special Olympics&#8230; even if you win, you&#8217;re still retarded.</p>
<p>Mattski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Balusik</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47863</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Balusik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47863</guid>
		<description>I am not completely sold on the idea of large companies colapsing because of too much size and/or diversity. If the structure and autonomy are correct, one big company can function the same as several small companies but with a financial safety net. However, google seems to rush too many apps to market. Many of them are very flawed and most of them are short on support and resources. This early adopter dissatisfaction is surely what leads to so many google apps just falling flat and languishing. This, however, is not insurmountable for google. If they can achieve the focus and accountability that a small company must have when entering new markets, they can continue to grow and succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not completely sold on the idea of large companies colapsing because of too much size and/or diversity. If the structure and autonomy are correct, one big company can function the same as several small companies but with a financial safety net. However, google seems to rush too many apps to market. Many of them are very flawed and most of them are short on support and resources. This early adopter dissatisfaction is surely what leads to so many google apps just falling flat and languishing. This, however, is not insurmountable for google. If they can achieve the focus and accountability that a small company must have when entering new markets, they can continue to grow and succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elections guy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47859</link>
		<dc:creator>Elections guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47859</guid>
		<description>No one would kill Google or MS, another star will rise in convergence of mobile and PC technologies, Nokia now is really close to it.

&lt;em&gt;Elections guy&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://chasinggoogle.blogspot.com/2008/04/polls-before-pennsylvania-primary-obama.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Polls before Pennsylvania primary: Obama most popular&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one would kill Google or MS, another star will rise in convergence of mobile and PC technologies, Nokia now is really close to it.</p>
<p><em>Elections guy&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://chasinggoogle.blogspot.com/2008/04/polls-before-pennsylvania-primary-obama.html' rel="nofollow">Polls before Pennsylvania primary: Obama most popular</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 07:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47856</guid>
		<description>Unless one of the other search engines does something really amazing, I don&#039;t see google dying anytime soon. But we must keep in mind that most of the average internet users do not use google, most people will search on yahoo if they need something.  Google is king only among the search marketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless one of the other search engines does something really amazing, I don&#8217;t see google dying anytime soon. But we must keep in mind that most of the average internet users do not use google, most people will search on yahoo if they need something.  Google is king only among the search marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Marketing Man</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47853</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Marketing Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 06:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47853</guid>
		<description>Everything works cyclical, and in today&#039;s world attention spans are notoriously short and crowds are notoriously fickle. Today&#039;s best flavour is tomorrow&#039;s old news, etc, etc. Nobody and nothing is immune to this syndrone, so it will be interesting to see the Google juggernaut evolve to beat this. Good post, thank you Alan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything works cyclical, and in today&#8217;s world attention spans are notoriously short and crowds are notoriously fickle. Today&#8217;s best flavour is tomorrow&#8217;s old news, etc, etc. Nobody and nothing is immune to this syndrone, so it will be interesting to see the Google juggernaut evolve to beat this. Good post, thank you Alan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/the-real-google-killer.html/comment-page-1#comment-47851</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 05:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5216#comment-47851</guid>
		<description>I like your point of view...It&#039;s true that Google is the best for current time but soon they must aware that over self confidence is the biggest enemy. Hope it is before their glorious time pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your point of view&#8230;It&#8217;s true that Google is the best for current time but soon they must aware that over self confidence is the biggest enemy. Hope it is before their glorious time pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
