<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Testing May Doom Your Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/why-testing-may-doom-your-rankings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/why-testing-may-doom-your-rankings.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/why-testing-may-doom-your-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-48862</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5317#comment-48862</guid>
		<description>If Google Optimizer is ok with serving search engine bots the original version repeatedly despite showing other users different versions, I wonder how they differentiate between websites doing versioning and websites that are cloaking?

It seems like search engines would definitely not be ok with serving their bots a &#039;seo friendly&#039; version while serving users a completely differnet &#039;conversion friendly&#039; version.

Maybe there is some good faith given by SEs when they believe legitimate testing is going on?

Very interesting, good comment, good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google Optimizer is ok with serving search engine bots the original version repeatedly despite showing other users different versions, I wonder how they differentiate between websites doing versioning and websites that are cloaking?</p>
<p>It seems like search engines would definitely not be ok with serving their bots a &#8216;seo friendly&#8217; version while serving users a completely differnet &#8216;conversion friendly&#8217; version.</p>
<p>Maybe there is some good faith given by SEs when they believe legitimate testing is going on?</p>
<p>Very interesting, good comment, good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Furr</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/why-testing-may-doom-your-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-48784</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Furr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5317#comment-48784</guid>
		<description>One thing to remember is that Google Website Optimizer, Vertster, and other smart testing tools use JavaScript to serve up different versions.  Search engine bots DO NOT process JavaScript, and so they only recognize the ORIGINAL version.  So, with a smart testing tool, the test will not mess up your SEO rankings.  Only after you finalize the test and deploy your new conversion-optimized version will most search engines recognize the change in content.  Taking this consideration into account, good article!

&lt;em&gt;Roy Furr&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.FreshLookInc.com/marketing-testing/instant-profit-boost-with-google-website-optimizer/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Instant Profit Boost with Google Website Optimizer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to remember is that Google Website Optimizer, Vertster, and other smart testing tools use JavaScript to serve up different versions.  Search engine bots DO NOT process JavaScript, and so they only recognize the ORIGINAL version.  So, with a smart testing tool, the test will not mess up your SEO rankings.  Only after you finalize the test and deploy your new conversion-optimized version will most search engines recognize the change in content.  Taking this consideration into account, good article!</p>
<p><em>Roy Furr&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.FreshLookInc.com/marketing-testing/instant-profit-boost-with-google-website-optimizer/' rel="nofollow">Instant Profit Boost with Google Website Optimizer</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan davis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/why-testing-may-doom-your-rankings.html/comment-page-1#comment-48752</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 06:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5317#comment-48752</guid>
		<description>Good Article, is it sad that I also got out of this article that it&#039;s good to version pages in order to improve conversion rates, and not just that it needs to be done carefully for SEO? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article, is it sad that I also got out of this article that it&#8217;s good to version pages in order to improve conversion rates, and not just that it needs to be done carefully for SEO? <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

