<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Google Image Search Get Display Ads?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musashi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-48193</link>
		<dc:creator>Musashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5156#comment-48193</guid>
		<description>When using the normal search many people are intereted in the ads, because they often give relevant information and often i am really interested in buying something. But when i search for pictures i am not interested in buying something. I want to get pictures! The only profitable ads aould be ads for high quality pics or for posters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When using the normal search many people are intereted in the ads, because they often give relevant information and often i am really interested in buying something. But when i search for pictures i am not interested in buying something. I want to get pictures! The only profitable ads aould be ads for high quality pics or for posters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-47558</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5156#comment-47558</guid>
		<description>Now Google is best apart from all other image search engines. still they have to improve some of these parts. what u say guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now Google is best apart from all other image search engines. still they have to improve some of these parts. what u say guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-47388</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5156#comment-47388</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found the image search results to be only somewhat relevant to what I&#039;m looking for, so I think they should improve the quality of the results they are showing first before they try to make some money off of them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found the image search results to be only somewhat relevant to what I&#8217;m looking for, so I think they should improve the quality of the results they are showing first before they try to make some money off of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo dude</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-47379</link>
		<dc:creator>seo dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5156#comment-47379</guid>
		<description>Why not just stick a few ads on image search result pages? Obviously related to your search term. I assume they could have made millions over the years it was untapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just stick a few ads on image search result pages? Obviously related to your search term. I assume they could have made millions over the years it was untapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prosperity Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/05/will-google-image-search-get-display-ads.html/comment-page-1#comment-47335</link>
		<dc:creator>Prosperity Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5156#comment-47335</guid>
		<description>i read somewhere in this blog that the main priority of google is monetizing youtube. now they also want to monetize image search. google has a lot of untapped cash cows!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read somewhere in this blog that the main priority of google is monetizing youtube. now they also want to monetize image search. google has a lot of untapped cash cows!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

