<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Takes Google to Task on Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Krishnaswamy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50506</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Krishnaswamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50506</guid>
		<description>Ask ? Who ? I agree that with 5% of the share, Ask is nowhere. They are simply trying to get more eyeballs; and frankly it is not going to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask ? Who ? I agree that with 5% of the share, Ask is nowhere. They are simply trying to get more eyeballs; and frankly it is not going to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50423</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50423</guid>
		<description>“We’ve also added some specific privacy policy requirements that make it necessary for publishers to post and abide by a transparent privacy policy for their users. According to this policy, publishers must notify their users of the use of cookies and/or web beacons to collect data in the ad serving process. This change relates to advertisers’ use of innovative products and features like Gadget Ads, Google’s new test ad server, and other offerings(Google Analytics)! in the future.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We’ve also added some specific privacy policy requirements that make it necessary for publishers to post and abide by a transparent privacy policy for their users. According to this policy, publishers must notify their users of the use of cookies and/or web beacons to collect data in the ad serving process. This change relates to advertisers’ use of innovative products and features like Gadget Ads, Google’s new test ad server, and other offerings(Google Analytics)! in the future.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Price</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50411</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50411</guid>
		<description>Irrespective of the usefulness of the service offered, that it has offered something unique that the big daddy does not is interesting.  Will be interesting to see what happens.

&lt;em&gt;Nicole Price&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.greatpriceshere.com/2008/06/18/cheap-designer-handbags/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bag It!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irrespective of the usefulness of the service offered, that it has offered something unique that the big daddy does not is interesting.  Will be interesting to see what happens.</p>
<p><em>Nicole Price&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.greatpriceshere.com/2008/06/18/cheap-designer-handbags/' rel="nofollow">Bag It!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warenwirtschaft</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50392</link>
		<dc:creator>Warenwirtschaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50392</guid>
		<description>I think this whole privacy-link-discussion is absolutely useless. Who cares if they have the link on the homepage or one click later. Why is the privacy statement so important. Does anybody read it? Does it change anything if i read it? Can i load up my own privacy-statement if i use google-search replacing their statement?
This is just a useless discussion. What is interesting is, if they have clauses in their statement that are critical. Or if they follow it or ignore it. That would be an interesting discussion. Not some useless link-position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this whole privacy-link-discussion is absolutely useless. Who cares if they have the link on the homepage or one click later. Why is the privacy statement so important. Does anybody read it? Does it change anything if i read it? Can i load up my own privacy-statement if i use google-search replacing their statement?<br />
This is just a useless discussion. What is interesting is, if they have clauses in their statement that are critical. Or if they follow it or ignore it. That would be an interesting discussion. Not some useless link-position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otilia Otlacan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50387</link>
		<dc:creator>Otilia Otlacan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50387</guid>
		<description>The irony is, Google itself requires that publishers employing the AdSense program have a privacy policy and link to it :-D Since AdSense is really a monetizing solution for small and mid-sized publishers, I can&#039;t help but giggle thinking of the plethora of blogs and tiny sites developing privacy policies... right, as if this will happen! 
To quote a recent entry from the AdSense Help Center (added after they have enabled 3rd party ads to be served on their content network): &quot;We&#039;ve also added some specific privacy policy requirements that make it necessary for publishers to post and abide by a transparent privacy policy for their users. According to this policy, publishers must notify their users of the use of cookies and/or web beacons to collect data in the ad serving process. This change relates to advertisers&#039; use of innovative products and features like Gadget Ads, Google&#039;s new test ad server, and other offerings in the future.&quot;
One more policy that will never be enforced...

&lt;em&gt;Otilia Otlacan&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OtiliaOtlacan/~3/314872018/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IAB Extends Membership Benefits to Small Publishers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony is, Google itself requires that publishers employing the AdSense program have a privacy policy and link to it <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  Since AdSense is really a monetizing solution for small and mid-sized publishers, I can&#8217;t help but giggle thinking of the plethora of blogs and tiny sites developing privacy policies&#8230; right, as if this will happen!<br />
To quote a recent entry from the AdSense Help Center (added after they have enabled 3rd party ads to be served on their content network): &#8220;We&#8217;ve also added some specific privacy policy requirements that make it necessary for publishers to post and abide by a transparent privacy policy for their users. According to this policy, publishers must notify their users of the use of cookies and/or web beacons to collect data in the ad serving process. This change relates to advertisers&#8217; use of innovative products and features like Gadget Ads, Google&#8217;s new test ad server, and other offerings in the future.&#8221;<br />
One more policy that will never be enforced&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Otilia Otlacan&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OtiliaOtlacan/~3/314872018/' rel="nofollow">IAB Extends Membership Benefits to Small Publishers</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PS3</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/ask-takes-google-to-task-on-privacy.html/comment-page-1#comment-50375</link>
		<dc:creator>PS3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5457#comment-50375</guid>
		<description>What would Jeeves had said :)

5% of global searches isn&#039;t a bad thing in isolation, certainly gives Ask sufficient clout to bring the issue back to the coal face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Jeeves had said <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>5% of global searches isn&#8217;t a bad thing in isolation, certainly gives Ask sufficient clout to bring the issue back to the coal face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

