<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linky Goodness, June 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49676</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was interested in the very article that tells about duplicate content. However in what way we&#039;&#039;ll get that this or that site contains the info based on the above content???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was interested in the very article that tells about duplicate content. However in what way we&#8221;ll get that this or that site contains the info based on the above content???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49649</guid>
		<description>@Jordan

I know what you mean Jordan, but my point is it would be nice to have direct instruction from them.  Where in this piece do they tell us how to identify websites that have issues with duplicate content?

I greatly appreciate Google communicating with us, but I find far to often subject are briefly touch on by them and not completely explained.

&lt;em&gt;Jaan Kanellis&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jaankanellis.com/who-is-the-best-looking-man-of-seo/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Who Is The Best Looking Man of SEO?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jordan</p>
<p>I know what you mean Jordan, but my point is it would be nice to have direct instruction from them.  Where in this piece do they tell us how to identify websites that have issues with duplicate content?</p>
<p>I greatly appreciate Google communicating with us, but I find far to often subject are briefly touch on by them and not completely explained.</p>
<p><em>Jaan Kanellis&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.jaankanellis.com/who-is-the-best-looking-man-of-seo/' rel="nofollow">Who Is The Best Looking Man of SEO?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49648</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49648</guid>
		<description>As far as I can see, they only referenced one post on one other person&#039;s blog (Adam Lasnik&#039;s post and the first post they refer to by Vanessa Fox are both on the Google Webmaster Central blog).  And that person is Vanessa Fox.  Why repeat something she&#039;s already covered quite well that deals with a specialized case?

Besides, even if they pointed to Marketing Pilgrim (not former Google employees :D ) and said &quot;This is what to do,&quot; that&#039;s pretty much being told from the horse&#039;s mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can see, they only referenced one post on one other person&#8217;s blog (Adam Lasnik&#8217;s post and the first post they refer to by Vanessa Fox are both on the Google Webmaster Central blog).  And that person is Vanessa Fox.  Why repeat something she&#8217;s already covered quite well that deals with a specialized case?</p>
<p>Besides, even if they pointed to Marketing Pilgrim (not former Google employees <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  ) and said &#8220;This is what to do,&#8221; that&#8217;s pretty much being told from the horse&#8217;s mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49635</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49635</guid>
		<description>Why would Google reference other blogs when telling people how to deal with duplicate content?  Um, why dont they just tell us from the horses mouth what to do?

&lt;em&gt;Jaan Kanellis&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jaankanellis.com/who-is-the-best-looking-man-of-seo/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Who Is The Best Looking Man of SEO?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Google reference other blogs when telling people how to deal with duplicate content?  Um, why dont they just tell us from the horses mouth what to do?</p>
<p><em>Jaan Kanellis&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.jaankanellis.com/who-is-the-best-looking-man-of-seo/' rel="nofollow">Who Is The Best Looking Man of SEO?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49627</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49627</guid>
		<description>Ohh .. the article on duplicate content was most interesting to me too. This sentence pretty much sums it up: &quot;To conclude, I&#039;d like to point out that in the majority of cases, having duplicate content does not have negative effects on your site&#039;s presence in the Google index.&quot;

&lt;em&gt;Owen&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://mba-geek.com/2008/06/misleading-headlines-lies-darned-lies-and-misrepresented-statistics/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Misleading headlines: Lies, darned lies, and misrepresented statistics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh .. the article on duplicate content was most interesting to me too. This sentence pretty much sums it up: &#8220;To conclude, I&#8217;d like to point out that in the majority of cases, having duplicate content does not have negative effects on your site&#8217;s presence in the Google index.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Owen&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://mba-geek.com/2008/06/misleading-headlines-lies-darned-lies-and-misrepresented-statistics/' rel="nofollow">Misleading headlines: Lies, darned lies, and misrepresented statistics</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo dude</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49615</link>
		<dc:creator>seo dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49615</guid>
		<description>Its not the scrappers that cause me problems. Its when people submit my content to social bookmark websites as soon as it comes out. So as far as Google is concerned, half the time its me who copies social bookmarking sites.

&lt;em&gt;seo dude&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.exposedseo.com/2008/06/07/fun-with-google-suggestions/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fun with Google suggestions&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not the scrappers that cause me problems. Its when people submit my content to social bookmark websites as soon as it comes out. So as far as Google is concerned, half the time its me who copies social bookmarking sites.</p>
<p><em>seo dude&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.exposedseo.com/2008/06/07/fun-with-google-suggestions/' rel="nofollow">Fun with Google suggestions</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PS3</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/06/linky-goodness-june-9.html/comment-page-1#comment-49609</link>
		<dc:creator>PS3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5390#comment-49609</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the article on duplicate content.  It&#039;s useful to see comments from the horses mouth so to speak.

I&#039;m curious to know. Are webmaster&#039;s likely to be happy with their content being used if the source is acknowledge and there is a link back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the article on duplicate content.  It&#8217;s useful to see comments from the horses mouth so to speak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to know. Are webmaster&#8217;s likely to be happy with their content being used if the source is acknowledge and there is a link back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

