<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pilgrim&#8217;s Picks for July 16</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warenwirtschaft</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52481</link>
		<dc:creator>Warenwirtschaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52481</guid>
		<description>And Microsoft is right. Google threatens to build a strong monopoly, especially together with yahoo. I still wonder why people still dont protest this more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Microsoft is right. Google threatens to build a strong monopoly, especially together with yahoo. I still wonder why people still dont protest this more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PS3</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52423</link>
		<dc:creator>PS3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52423</guid>
		<description>Andy, we don&#039;t see much on the rebate side, the only exception is really cashback on mobile phone contracts.

One of the coders at gmail obviously has a good sense of humour !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, we don&#8217;t see much on the rebate side, the only exception is really cashback on mobile phone contracts.</p>
<p>One of the coders at gmail obviously has a good sense of humour !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Marketing Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52407</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Marketing Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52407</guid>
		<description>Gmail vulnerability --- interesting stuff!

&lt;em&gt;Blog Marketing Journal&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/07/16/wordpress-26-released-early/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WordPress 2.6 Released Early&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail vulnerability &#8212; interesting stuff!</p>
<p><em>Blog Marketing Journal&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://blogmarketingjournal.com/2008/07/16/wordpress-26-released-early/' rel="nofollow">WordPress 2.6 Released Early</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52399</guid>
		<description>I like this one - Gmail vulnerability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this one &#8211; Gmail vulnerability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52398</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52398</guid>
		<description>@MB - have rebates made it to the UK yet? Over here, you&#039;ll see &quot;just $49!&quot; but the small print reveals it&#039;s actually $149, with a $100 rebate check, they send you sometime before you die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MB &#8211; have rebates made it to the UK yet? Over here, you&#8217;ll see &#8220;just $49!&#8221; but the small print reveals it&#8217;s actually $149, with a $100 rebate check, they send you sometime before you die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52396</link>
		<dc:creator>MB Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52396</guid>
		<description>The worst offender, at least here in the UK, is companies declaring a product&#039;s price is &quot;less than £500!&quot; when it is, of course, £499.99 

Literally correct but actually very irritating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst offender, at least here in the UK, is companies declaring a product&#8217;s price is &#8220;less than £500!&#8221; when it is, of course, £499.99 </p>
<p>Literally correct but actually very irritating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifty Studio</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52393</link>
		<dc:creator>Fifty Studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52393</guid>
		<description>My favorite is when companies say things like &quot;more than 69.17%&quot; in things like press releases. It happens all the time. What is that supposed to mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is when companies say things like &#8220;more than 69.17%&#8221; in things like press releases. It happens all the time. What is that supposed to mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52388</guid>
		<description>LOL - I guess 70% is just sexier than 69.17%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL &#8211; I guess 70% is just sexier than 69.17%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-52385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/07/pilgrims-picks-for-july-16-2.html#comment-52385</guid>
		<description>On CNET and rounding&#8212;as my (computer software) engineer dad always says, &quot;Two plus two equals five . . . for sufficiently large values of two.&quot;

And NOW you know where I get it from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On CNET and rounding&mdash;as my (computer software) engineer dad always says, &#8220;Two plus two equals five . . . for sufficiently large values of two.&#8221;</p>
<p>And NOW you know where I get it from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
