<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdYouGoogleTubeWords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:48:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: poor jokes</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/comment-page-1#comment-54915</link>
		<dc:creator>poor jokes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5720#comment-54915</guid>
		<description>i think this will work wonders for the video sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this will work wonders for the video sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah SEO Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/comment-page-1#comment-53905</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah SEO Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5720#comment-53905</guid>
		<description>Seems like people would REALLY have &quot;banner blindness&quot; on a standardized player.

&lt;em&gt;Utah SEO Pro&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jordankasteler.com/utah-seo-pro-blog/mobile-local-mobile-2/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mobile SEO - SMX Local Mobile 2008 Presentation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like people would REALLY have &#8220;banner blindness&#8221; on a standardized player.</p>
<p><em>Utah SEO Pro&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.jordankasteler.com/utah-seo-pro-blog/mobile-local-mobile-2/' rel="nofollow">Mobile SEO &#8211; SMX Local Mobile 2008 Presentation</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Rakauskas</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/comment-page-1#comment-53874</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Rakauskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5720#comment-53874</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Tweet about this ...

This model is the reason why everyone is leaving their TV set off and doing other things. They tried to ban home video recording here because advertisers were panicking that nobody would see their ads.

LOL of course not, their ads suck anyway ...

You get ads in Pay TV too, which is why I don&#039;t have it ...

I for one will click off a video on the net if it shows me ads in the screen space - I don&#039;t mind the model that shows a scrolling text in the player itself - they have to find some way to pay for the bandwidth.

But what will happen is the smart marketers won&#039;t  want their audience bombarded and will use hosts that don&#039;t do in your face advertising. 

And how is Google going to justify advertising cost when it is so untargeted ...

Live long. Live well.
Rick Rakauskas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Tweet about this &#8230;</p>
<p>This model is the reason why everyone is leaving their TV set off and doing other things. They tried to ban home video recording here because advertisers were panicking that nobody would see their ads.</p>
<p>LOL of course not, their ads suck anyway &#8230;</p>
<p>You get ads in Pay TV too, which is why I don&#8217;t have it &#8230;</p>
<p>I for one will click off a video on the net if it shows me ads in the screen space &#8211; I don&#8217;t mind the model that shows a scrolling text in the player itself &#8211; they have to find some way to pay for the bandwidth.</p>
<p>But what will happen is the smart marketers won&#8217;t  want their audience bombarded and will use hosts that don&#8217;t do in your face advertising. </p>
<p>And how is Google going to justify advertising cost when it is so untargeted &#8230;</p>
<p>Live long. Live well.<br />
Rick Rakauskas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMB's Have More Marketing Options Than Ever and Video Adds to the Clamor - Frank Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/comment-page-1#comment-53817</link>
		<dc:creator>SMB's Have More Marketing Options Than Ever and Video Adds to the Clamor - Frank Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5720#comment-53817</guid>
		<description>[...] read the entire post, go to Marketing Pilgrim.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the entire post, go to Marketing Pilgrim.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otilia Otlacan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/08/adyougoogletubewords.html/comment-page-1#comment-53814</link>
		<dc:creator>Otilia Otlacan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=5720#comment-53814</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, this is about the only way of monetizing embeddable players.

While the pros of it are obvious (well... monetization, and at higher CPMs than regular display ads), the cons are quite numerous:

- skewed ad targeting;
- difficult to nearly impossible management of any revenue split schemes, if running any;
- possible branding conflicts between the brands advertised in the player and brands advertised on the sites where the player gets embedded;
- complete lack of control over branding once the player leaves the original site and gets embedded, something that will probably backlash in the long term and drive advertisers to force lower CPMs, thus diminishing the pros mentioned in the first place.

Still, I believe this model will be a hit for a while, and many owners of video content will want to piggyback their booked ad campaigns on other sites&#039; impressions.

&lt;em&gt;Otilia Otlacan&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2008/08/08/its-google-put-your-child-in-a-kennel-day/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It&#039;s Google ?Put Your Child in a Kennel? Day!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, this is about the only way of monetizing embeddable players.</p>
<p>While the pros of it are obvious (well&#8230; monetization, and at higher CPMs than regular display ads), the cons are quite numerous:</p>
<p>- skewed ad targeting;<br />
- difficult to nearly impossible management of any revenue split schemes, if running any;<br />
- possible branding conflicts between the brands advertised in the player and brands advertised on the sites where the player gets embedded;<br />
- complete lack of control over branding once the player leaves the original site and gets embedded, something that will probably backlash in the long term and drive advertisers to force lower CPMs, thus diminishing the pros mentioned in the first place.</p>
<p>Still, I believe this model will be a hit for a while, and many owners of video content will want to piggyback their booked ad campaigns on other sites&#8217; impressions.</p>
<p><em>Otilia Otlacan&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2008/08/08/its-google-put-your-child-in-a-kennel-day/' rel="nofollow">It&#8217;s Google ?Put Your Child in a Kennel? Day!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
