Wednesday, August 13th, 2008 by Andy Beal

It must be a least a week since we’ve had a juicy meme to sink out teeth into. Fortunately, one has surfaced over the past few days: Is there still a need for public relations?
TechCrunch, RWW, and Steve Rubel are among those weighing in with their thoughts on the subject. Here are a few choice morsels:
First off, don’t hire PR help until the volume of inbound requests by press are simply too much to handle without help.
Until then, take the time to start reading blogs and other publications that cover what you’re doing. Go to an event or two. This should be fun for you, since they’re writing about stuff that you’re spending all your time on. You’ll start to see links to other relevant sites, and before long you’ll fully understand who’s who in the space, get a feel for people’s personalities and passions, etc. Leave a few thoughtful comments. Better yet, start your own blog and link appropriately. And in your leisure time participate in the fascinating conversations occurring on Twitter and FriendFeed.
You got to love Arrington’s assumption that those involved in a start-up have “leisure time!”
RWW:
The point is that great technologies probably do sell themselves. The web is mostly filled with bad technologies, though, and it’s the job of the technology press to find the good ones, with occasional discoveries of greatness. Can PR people help us do that? They can. Is it worth the expense and loss of direct experience for many startups to hire PR people? It probably is.
We have to stop spamming people and make sure that companies and products are easy and a joy to discover. That’s no easy feat. Further, it means giving up control. However, in a Google age where self-discovery rules, it’s becoming a must.
How about what I think of PR? If you’ve read Radically Transparent or attended my Reputation Management Workshop, you’ll already know the evolved way to use public relations to promote your brand–so, I won’t dwell on “tips” per se. However, I do want to share my thoughts on where I have found a PR firm to be valuable for my previous start-ups.
Public relations won’t disappear as a profession anytime soon. But, like most industries, you have to evolve or die. Those PR folks that realize their role is not to step into the limelight–but to push their client into it–will never go hungry.
So, what are your thoughts on PR? How does PR help your company? Or perhaps, you think it’s already a dead duck.

Want more marketing news & views? Follow Marketing Pilgrim's Andy Beal on Twitter!
Similar Stories in: General | Forward:

Fifty Studio Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
The thing is, most jobs have “stuff” that can be done by other people or by yourself. PR is no exception. Anybody can email TechCrunch with an idea or they can pay a PR firm to do it. If that’s all PR was, they’d all go out of business.
The best PR is more about messaging and strategy and this post only addresses tactics. Bad strategy kills businesses all the time… Cuil is a great example of this. BriteKite is another great example. BriteKite had way too many people saying nice things about it before it went live. The do-it-yourselfers can’t see that is a problem half the time. I spent 5 years in PR. From what I’m seeing, I would anticipate the evolvers acquiring some online reputation management firms here shortly.
Fifty Studio’s last blog post..Win Batman Dark Knight tickets
Otilia Otlacan Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Of course there’s still need for PR.
But they will need to understand how things work online and learn their lessons well… I’ve seen many established PR companies in Europe (some even claiming to have online expertise) not having a clue what to do, while charging their clients an arm, a leg and a firstborn.
Utah SEO Pro Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
PR will never be obsolete. Trends will definitely change the industry though.
Utah SEO Pro’s last blog post..Mobile SEO – SMX Local Mobile 2008 Presentation
Links do Dia: 14.08.08 « Dissonância Cognitiva Says:
August 14th, 2008 at 4:55 am
[...] Public Relations is Not Obsolete; It Just Needs New Spots – Marketing Pilgrim It must be a least a week since we’ve had a juicy meme to sink out teeth into. Fortunately, one has surfaced over the past few days: Is there still a need for public relations? TechCrunch, RWW, and Steve Rubel are among those weighing in with their thoughts on the subject No Comments Leave a Commenttrackback addressThere was an error with your comment, please try again. name (requerido)email (will not be published) (requerido)url [...]
Nicole Price Says:
August 14th, 2008 at 6:32 am
I would suggest that it all depends on the size of your business. If it is still manageable by the promoter and she is focused on one business, it is a waste of resources to seek outside professional help. Secondly, as long as a small business person is getting better instead of bigger all the time, there will be little need for external PR.
Nicole Price’s last blog post..My Tryst With Hard Drive Recovery
PS3 Says:
August 14th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
There’s definitely a need for PR still but PR firms to update some of their strategies.
Russell Page Says:
August 14th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
@PS3
“There’s definitely a need for PR still but PR firms to update some of their strategies.”
That applies to every discipline.
Russell Page’s last blog post..Win Batman Dark Knight tickets
links for 2008-08-14 | Company K Media Says:
August 14th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
[...] Public Relations is Not Obsolete; It Just Needs New Spots (tags: PR marketing business strategy) [...]
Public Relations Says:
August 15th, 2008 at 1:50 am
Let us call it ‘PR 2.0′
PR is dead. Long live PR | danleach.co.uk Says:
August 18th, 2008 at 11:53 am
[...] Public Relations is Not Obsolete; It Just Needs New Spots [...]
The busy executive’s guide to publicity success « Knowledge Workers Says:
August 20th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
[...] Public Relations is Not Obsolete; It Just Needs New Spots [...]