Thursday, September 4th, 2008 by Frank Reed
As noted by Andy Beal earlier today there appears to be some unnecessary alarmism regarding the current state on online ad spends. I say unnecessary because as we have noted on another occasion the media really has a twisted sense of when the sky is falling. According to the Wall Street Journal today there is actually cause for celebration from the 2nd quarter numbers for Internet advertising rose 20%. So what’s your take? Should we panic and go back to smoke signals or just struggle through a sluggish 20% growth cycle?
I can’t take this anymore! What I liked most about the WSJ take on this news was where advertisers were focusing their spend. This was actually valuable because it appears that while we fly ahead towards Web x.0 (insert your favorite version) people who like to advertise to other people who like to buy their products are spending more on – GASP! – text ads in search engines. It’s on track for $10.4 billion this year. This is double what will be spent on display ads and the gap is widening.
As an example take Creditcards.com which is referred to as typical. They spent $30 million on online marketing last year. By the way, since I usually work with the SMB (small medium business) market a $30 million spend is not typical at all but I digress. Some of that budget last year was used to experiment with buying display ads and now this year that experiment will be halted and those dollars redirected to – you guessed it – search ads. Apparently the ROI on the display ads didn’t cut it.
With more than 70% of the US search-ad market, Google is smiling bigger than ever. This news comes on the tail of their Chrome browser beta this week. World domination is just around the corner apparently. The article continues with a lot of spin from the likes of Yahoo!, AOL and Microsoft to say that display advertising is not suffering like it seems because (insert lame PR excuse here).
The part that was distressing to me going back to point earlier about the small business search marketer is that there is an apparent cutting back in this segment around number of keywords being purchased. I personally just see that as small business folks not wanting to waste money on poorly converting terms while letting the big boys spend as freely as ever. One man’s opinion. John Aiken of Majestic Research notes that more ads are showing up for some keywords and suggests that Google is “potentially stretching for dollars”. Google’s response was that in many cases it just has more ads to show because of the volume.
It’s up to us as internet marketers to cut through this stuff and do the next right thing. Just continue doing search marketing because it works. What a novel idea, huh?

Similar Stories in: Display, Search | Forward: Email This Post
Search Engine News » The Real News About Online Advertising Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 4:47 am
[...] More from http://www.marketingpilgrim.com…; [...]
Otooo Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 12:36 am
I bet Google’s smiling - adsense click costs seem to be getting smaller and smaller for me while there are more clicks received
Otooo’s last blog post..Freebies: Enter The Contest
Ashley Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 5:51 am
The reason of more ads to show because of the volume is not quite proffesional explanation, isn’t it?
Ashley’s last blog post..Jingle Bell Rock Lyrics
Frank Reed Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 8:43 am
Ashley,
I suspect that there was a bit more to that answer but all that the Journal “shared” was that tidbit. Makes you wonder if they were trying to make Google look a certain way. Google’s success certainly opens them up for that kind of “treatment”. Having said all of that I doubt anyone at Google lost any sleep over it either!
Thanks, Ashley.
Frank Reed’s last blog post..Interview with LinkedIn Guru Chuck Hester - Part 1
tmdesigner Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 10:33 am
Anche in Italia gli investimenti in Pubblicità sono aumentati non di poco negli ultimi mesi.. il problema è che la gente non ha soldi da spendere! Che paradigma…
Utah SEO Pro Says:
September 7th, 2008 at 4:45 am
$30 million in online marketing? wow! i know a lot of big domains/sites that have a problem with even a few thousand dollars.
Utah SEO Pro’s last blog post..Building an SEO Friendly Site - SES San Jose 2008 Presentation
PS3 Says:
September 7th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
To what extent does Google increase the cost per click if volume declines?
Jeffrey Pipes Guice Says:
September 7th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
I’m interested in reaching social network websites who are interested in trading equity for a $10,000,000 media campaign.
SEO forums Says:
September 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am
I think the figure will go on increasing only……coz there will e further increase in internet users.
SEO forums’s last blog post..Backlinks.Com - Make easy money with your Blog
House Signs Says:
September 8th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
I agree with your comment seoforums, not only that, but people, and companies are starting to realise that they have to pay to be seen.
House Signs’s last blog post..House Signs - Hand Painted Signs by Trudy Silcox
Juicy Links: September 1 - September 5 : Exclusive Concepts Blog Says:
September 9th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
[...] The Real News About Online Advertising [...]
Jason Trump Says:
September 20th, 2008 at 8:31 am
Frank, Thanks for the great post. Yes, Google is laughing themselves to the bank and will be for a while. I am an Adwords coach and consultant and see everyday how much of a stronghold Google has on the search engine marketing world.
Get a piece of the action and beat the Adwords System. Contact http://www.jtdesigns.com