Citing an example of [red roses in burmingham alabama], Schneider pointed out that while there’s some competition for the term among the 11 advertisers listed on Google, there are no advertisers listed on Yahoo—and now those 11 advertisers will be able to capture more clicks from Yahoo users.
Hey, that’s cool. But let’s be honest here—at least a few of those 11 advertisers probably made a conscious decision not to advertise on Yahoo. Perhaps one or two didn’t know how to get onto Yahoo’s paid listings. Another few might have decided that their limited time is best spent focusing on AdWords. These advertisers might benefit from the deal, since they’ll be able to extend their audience without much further effort (probably).
But what about advertisers who opt out because they’ve tried Yahoo and found that it wasn’t worth the cost—either the traffic Yahoo generated was lower quality or low enough volume that they simply didn’t want or need to advertise on Yahoo? (Seriously, how many people are searching for red roses in Birmingham?)
The Association of National Advertisers seems to agree. They’ve already pledged $100 billion to fighting the deal, but they’re not the only ones opposed. Yesterday, All Things Digital encouraged the Google chief to “Do Walk Away, Sergey” (lyrical quibble: The Left Banke song says “Just walk away, Renée,” not “Don’t walk away, Renée”).
Sure, the deal would ensure Google a stranglehold on the search advertising market and increase their revenues. But, as Kara Swisher points out, even if regulators approve this deal, dominating the market might actually hurt Google in the long run—the next time they go before regulators, they’re sure to get a long, hard look.
Still, Schneider was confident that the DoJ would approve the deal by its slated start date early next month.