<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s SearchWiki Is Here To Stay: Is This The Death of SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:11:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-67416</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-67416</guid>
		<description>Death of SEO? Not at all ... it actually puts more pressure on SEO .. it&#039;ll change SEO though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Death of SEO? Not at all &#8230; it actually puts more pressure on SEO .. it&#8217;ll change SEO though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Software Vendor</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-63888</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Software Vendor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-63888</guid>
		<description>On the positive side, it seems like those black hat SEO&#039;ers with terrible content the sites should be moved out of the top rankings at some point.  On the other hand, irreversible public comments made by the competition could get very, very ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the positive side, it seems like those black hat SEO&#8217;ers with terrible content the sites should be moved out of the top rankings at some point.  On the other hand, irreversible public comments made by the competition could get very, very ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: galin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-62184</link>
		<dc:creator>galin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-62184</guid>
		<description>Telling the truth, I am quite sure in positive results of SearchWiki usage. This feature is sure to result a rise in the SEO value.  Additionally, such a kind of SearchWiki will make SEOs to be more concentrated on useful, beneficial and proper 1st quality cinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telling the truth, I am quite sure in positive results of SearchWiki usage. This feature is sure to result a rise in the SEO value.  Additionally, such a kind of SearchWiki will make SEOs to be more concentrated on useful, beneficial and proper 1st quality cinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSYM</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61841</link>
		<dc:creator>OSYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61841</guid>
		<description>Andy - it will make SEO infinitely more powerful for those who are doing it right (relevant/engaging content), and infinitely impossible of those who do it wrong (black hat). It’s not the end of SEO at all. It’s the end of gaming the system. And that, my friend, is a great thing.

&lt;em&gt;OSYM&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.osyme.net/araliktaki-sinav-icin-son-gun/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aralıktaki Sınav için Son Gün&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; it will make SEO infinitely more powerful for those who are doing it right (relevant/engaging content), and infinitely impossible of those who do it wrong (black hat). It’s not the end of SEO at all. It’s the end of gaming the system. And that, my friend, is a great thing.</p>
<p><em>OSYM&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.osyme.net/araliktaki-sinav-icin-son-gun/' rel="nofollow">Aralıktaki Sınav için Son Gün</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah SEO Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61500</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah SEO Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61500</guid>
		<description>Personalization or SearchWiki won&#039;t equate to the death of SEO. It&#039;ll just change things a bit.

&lt;em&gt;Utah SEO Pro&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jordankasteler.com/utah-seo-pro-blog/exactfactor-seo-tool-review/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ExactFactor: An SEO Tool Review&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalization or SearchWiki won&#8217;t equate to the death of SEO. It&#8217;ll just change things a bit.</p>
<p><em>Utah SEO Pro&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.jordankasteler.com/utah-seo-pro-blog/exactfactor-seo-tool-review/' rel="nofollow">ExactFactor: An SEO Tool Review</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anaokulu</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61363</link>
		<dc:creator>Anaokulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61363</guid>
		<description>The same thing is going to happen with Search Wiki. Just wait till you do everything you possibly can to satisfy an unreasonable client with no success and decides that a vendetta agains your site in Google is a great way to obtain revenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing is going to happen with Search Wiki. Just wait till you do everything you possibly can to satisfy an unreasonable client with no success and decides that a vendetta agains your site in Google is a great way to obtain revenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Pandia Weekend Wrap-up Nov 29, Search Engine News</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61200</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Pandia Weekend Wrap-up Nov 29, Search Engine News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61200</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s SearchWiki Is Here To Stay: Is This The Death of SEO? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s SearchWiki Is Here To Stay: Is This The Death of SEO? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Agency Nottingham</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61133</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Agency Nottingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61133</guid>
		<description>Of course these are just ideas, it may never happen. Like what Marshall said, give it 6 months to year until Google has played with the data then we may see it start influencing live search.

If they do allow us to influence live search ranking I think more weight will passed onto trusted Google account owners who have been registered for years and have a good Google footprint. Those who have just signed up will have little or no influence on the rankings in live search.

For years Google has been busting a gut for all of us, so isn&#039;t it time we started to help them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course these are just ideas, it may never happen. Like what Marshall said, give it 6 months to year until Google has played with the data then we may see it start influencing live search.</p>
<p>If they do allow us to influence live search ranking I think more weight will passed onto trusted Google account owners who have been registered for years and have a good Google footprint. Those who have just signed up will have little or no influence on the rankings in live search.</p>
<p>For years Google has been busting a gut for all of us, so isn&#8217;t it time we started to help them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61125</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61125</guid>
		<description>The wiki is not scary if you have content. Content remains king. The blessing I find is to be able to comment and knock out the constant spam sites, made for adsense sites with little content, the software sites that seem to dominate every known keyword - why you might be able to eliminate enough chaff to make Google an actual valuable tool to get to information you were looking for. I think we all know how much one has to sift to find anything now? So for those whose SEO is to create a fine meta tag, title and page whose content matches to give the searcher what he was looking for it is great. For those whose SEO skills are used to try and bring scrapers and advertsing holes your days will be numbered by how fast Google notes the comments. Of course there could be competitive malpractice in this and that said it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wiki is not scary if you have content. Content remains king. The blessing I find is to be able to comment and knock out the constant spam sites, made for adsense sites with little content, the software sites that seem to dominate every known keyword &#8211; why you might be able to eliminate enough chaff to make Google an actual valuable tool to get to information you were looking for. I think we all know how much one has to sift to find anything now? So for those whose SEO is to create a fine meta tag, title and page whose content matches to give the searcher what he was looking for it is great. For those whose SEO skills are used to try and bring scrapers and advertsing holes your days will be numbered by how fast Google notes the comments. Of course there could be competitive malpractice in this and that said it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchWiki la muerte de los SEO &#124; Posicionamiento web en buscadores - Blog Posicionate.org</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61102</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchWiki la muerte de los SEO &#124; Posicionamiento web en buscadores - Blog Posicionate.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61102</guid>
		<description>[...] de la herramienta SearchWiki hace unos días, han sido muchos los que han visto esto como el fin del SEO. Los anuncios por parte de Google durante los últimos meses [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de la herramienta SearchWiki hace unos días, han sido muchos los que han visto esto como el fin del SEO. Los anuncios por parte de Google durante los últimos meses [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61066</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61066</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so, because I&#039;m sick of seeing the SEO experts getting all the lime-light for hot keywords, when it&#039;s content everybody&#039;s a king!

&lt;em&gt;Abdul&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.3arn.net/try-the-new-stumbleupon/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Try the new StumbleUpon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so, because I&#8217;m sick of seeing the SEO experts getting all the lime-light for hot keywords, when it&#8217;s content everybody&#8217;s a king!</p>
<p><em>Abdul&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.3arn.net/try-the-new-stumbleupon/' rel="nofollow">Try the new StumbleUpon</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebMetricsGuru &#187; Google Search Wiki is called the Death of Seo-danapalus</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61020</link>
		<dc:creator>WebMetricsGuru &#187; Google Search Wiki is called the Death of Seo-danapalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61020</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s SearchWiki Is Here To Stay: Is This The Death of SEO? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s SearchWiki Is Here To Stay: Is This The Death of SEO? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-61000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-61000</guid>
		<description>Turning it off is easy - sign out - I&#039;ve now signed out of Google when I search since I&#039;ve ruined my account by testing the new feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turning it off is easy &#8211; sign out &#8211; I&#8217;ve now signed out of Google when I search since I&#8217;ve ruined my account by testing the new feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphone</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60994</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60994</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of the changes to google, I&#039;m not sure if there&#039;s an option to turn it off completely but I&#039;d choose that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of the changes to google, I&#8217;m not sure if there&#8217;s an option to turn it off completely but I&#8217;d choose that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Sponder</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60985</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Sponder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60985</guid>
		<description>I like the Search Wiki though it&#039;s going to take a while to get enough comments on enough urls for enough common queries to make the feature useful, in my opinion.    


The other side of it - what incentives does the search have to leave a comment on a url? 

As far as one commenter on this thread that has a problem with Search Wiki Comments being saved against the url and not the search query - that would be almost impossible to do - there&#039;s so much that needs commenting on as it is - to only show the comment against the same exact query that generated the result that was commented on - would mean hardly anyone would ever see anyone&#039;s comments.

Give it 6 months to a year - collect enough data that individuals can start creating research around the commentary, plus new services and ranking extraction tools will be need to extract comments and present them in a report for clients - and I see this as being, really, a good thing - what Google has done here with Search Wiki.

Maybe the only thing I&#039;m afraid of, is what everyone else is afraid of - that people will say nasty things about each other and there&#039;d be no way to get rid of the comments - that can create all kinds of problems.  So ... is Search Wiki fully worked out?  No - more work is needed on this enhancement to search to make it possible for users to have privacy, when they want it - and that hasn&#039;t been done, as far as I can see.

But having said that - Google Search Wiki really does merge Search and SEO, and as a result, could feed the next revolution - which is that Social Media, it&#039;s ROI, now becomes more associated with Search than before - we can now begin to index Social Media ROI with Google&#039;s Search Wiki - the Wiki will be the door in to prove Social Media works, and is scalable. 

Just a thought on this pre-Thanksgiving day.

marshall

&lt;em&gt;Marshall Sponder&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebMetricsGuru/~3/465762068/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technology creates new advertising opportunities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Search Wiki though it&#8217;s going to take a while to get enough comments on enough urls for enough common queries to make the feature useful, in my opinion.    </p>
<p>The other side of it &#8211; what incentives does the search have to leave a comment on a url? </p>
<p>As far as one commenter on this thread that has a problem with Search Wiki Comments being saved against the url and not the search query &#8211; that would be almost impossible to do &#8211; there&#8217;s so much that needs commenting on as it is &#8211; to only show the comment against the same exact query that generated the result that was commented on &#8211; would mean hardly anyone would ever see anyone&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>Give it 6 months to a year &#8211; collect enough data that individuals can start creating research around the commentary, plus new services and ranking extraction tools will be need to extract comments and present them in a report for clients &#8211; and I see this as being, really, a good thing &#8211; what Google has done here with Search Wiki.</p>
<p>Maybe the only thing I&#8217;m afraid of, is what everyone else is afraid of &#8211; that people will say nasty things about each other and there&#8217;d be no way to get rid of the comments &#8211; that can create all kinds of problems.  So &#8230; is Search Wiki fully worked out?  No &#8211; more work is needed on this enhancement to search to make it possible for users to have privacy, when they want it &#8211; and that hasn&#8217;t been done, as far as I can see.</p>
<p>But having said that &#8211; Google Search Wiki really does merge Search and SEO, and as a result, could feed the next revolution &#8211; which is that Social Media, it&#8217;s ROI, now becomes more associated with Search than before &#8211; we can now begin to index Social Media ROI with Google&#8217;s Search Wiki &#8211; the Wiki will be the door in to prove Social Media works, and is scalable. </p>
<p>Just a thought on this pre-Thanksgiving day.</p>
<p>marshall</p>
<p><em>Marshall Sponder&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebMetricsGuru/~3/465762068/' rel="nofollow">Technology creates new advertising opportunities</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60983</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60983</guid>
		<description>Promoted sites and, indeed comments, don&#039;t show up on other computers or other users on the same computer. So, in answer to your question: No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Promoted sites and, indeed comments, don&#8217;t show up on other computers or other users on the same computer. So, in answer to your question: No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HowToMakeMyBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60966</link>
		<dc:creator>HowToMakeMyBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60966</guid>
		<description>I am a bit sceptical as well about the functionality and usability of SearchWiki. Especially if a promoted site/URL shows up for different searches as well. What happens when you have promoted some a large number of sites and only promoted sites start showing in the first page of the search results for many of your searches, it will be very hard to find new sites, and also very hard for new sites to do search engine optimization and get visibility in searches. I guess we will have to wait and see how SearchWiki will affect all this...

&lt;em&gt;HowToMakeMyBlog.com&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.howtomakemyblog.com/how-to-set-up-a-blog/two-simple-tips-to-recover-unverified-email-subscribers/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Two simple tips to recover unverified email subscribers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit sceptical as well about the functionality and usability of SearchWiki. Especially if a promoted site/URL shows up for different searches as well. What happens when you have promoted some a large number of sites and only promoted sites start showing in the first page of the search results for many of your searches, it will be very hard to find new sites, and also very hard for new sites to do search engine optimization and get visibility in searches. I guess we will have to wait and see how SearchWiki will affect all this&#8230;</p>
<p><em>HowToMakeMyBlog.com&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.howtomakemyblog.com/how-to-set-up-a-blog/two-simple-tips-to-recover-unverified-email-subscribers/' rel="nofollow">Two simple tips to recover unverified email subscribers</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60926</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60926</guid>
		<description>Jayson&#039;s right: &#039;Promote&#039; is just another word for &#039;Bookmark&#039;. And (as per Jaan&#039;s comment) people won&#039;t bookmark in searchwiki based on content, they&#039;ll do it based on brand name, title and desription. So IMHO, it&#039;ll make no difference whether you use blackhat or whitehat tactics, or whether you have quality content.

But I don&#039;t think any of it&#039;s likely to become an issue, because I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll ever really take off.

The big problem is that there&#039;s no real value in being able to Promote/bookmark a listing. The value of proper bookmarking is:
1) you&#039;ve found a good page (searchwiki fail - all searchwiki tells you is the title &amp; description; you don&#039;t know if it&#039;s good &#039;til you get there);
2) you quickly save that page (searchwiki fail - you have to press back first and find the listing); and
3) you can quickly retrieve it (searchwiki fail - you have to open searchwiki, remember the search query, perform the search, and click the promoted listing)

So who&#039;s going to use it? Who&#039;d would WANT to bookmark a page before they see it? And who&#039;d want to use searchwiki to bookmark when there are so many better ways of doing that? 

I reckon Google will realise that most people won&#039;t use it for the above reasons, and those who do will simply be getting less value out of Google search. So it won&#039;t last long. 

What&#039;s more, as a bookmarking system, it&#039;s pretty lame because it only allows you to bookmark those pages that you find thru search. In my experience, most people (power user webmasters &amp; SEOs aside) use one method for bookmarking. They&#039;re not going to want to use one method for pages they find thru search and another for pages they find through some other method!

And finally, there&#039;s the question of who&#039;s likely to actually perform the same search repeatedly. People who are after different results each time, of course! And what use will they have for it?

I&#039;m not discounting my other comment above, I just don&#039;t think it&#039;s gonna get to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayson&#8217;s right: &#8216;Promote&#8217; is just another word for &#8216;Bookmark&#8217;. And (as per Jaan&#8217;s comment) people won&#8217;t bookmark in searchwiki based on content, they&#8217;ll do it based on brand name, title and desription. So IMHO, it&#8217;ll make no difference whether you use blackhat or whitehat tactics, or whether you have quality content.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think any of it&#8217;s likely to become an issue, because I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll ever really take off.</p>
<p>The big problem is that there&#8217;s no real value in being able to Promote/bookmark a listing. The value of proper bookmarking is:<br />
1) you&#8217;ve found a good page (searchwiki fail &#8211; all searchwiki tells you is the title &amp; description; you don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s good &#8217;til you get there);<br />
2) you quickly save that page (searchwiki fail &#8211; you have to press back first and find the listing); and<br />
3) you can quickly retrieve it (searchwiki fail &#8211; you have to open searchwiki, remember the search query, perform the search, and click the promoted listing)</p>
<p>So who&#8217;s going to use it? Who&#8217;d would WANT to bookmark a page before they see it? And who&#8217;d want to use searchwiki to bookmark when there are so many better ways of doing that? </p>
<p>I reckon Google will realise that most people won&#8217;t use it for the above reasons, and those who do will simply be getting less value out of Google search. So it won&#8217;t last long. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, as a bookmarking system, it&#8217;s pretty lame because it only allows you to bookmark those pages that you find thru search. In my experience, most people (power user webmasters &amp; SEOs aside) use one method for bookmarking. They&#8217;re not going to want to use one method for pages they find thru search and another for pages they find through some other method!</p>
<p>And finally, there&#8217;s the question of who&#8217;s likely to actually perform the same search repeatedly. People who are after different results each time, of course! And what use will they have for it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not discounting my other comment above, I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s gonna get to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60923</guid>
		<description>I think it is completely ridiculous that people can simple move results where ever they want by only looking at how attractive the title and description are. Google gives webmasters zero control on how your title and description appears in the SERPs yet this is how most that use Search Wiki will judge. No one is going to go back and forth from SERP to website to take the time to rank websites. They will be moving websites around by the way they appear in the SERPs. I think that problem alone is not getting enough coverage and is far more troubling than the fact that this feature is being force feed to the webmaster community. I say webmaster community because let’s face it, how many other really have a Google account anyways.

&lt;em&gt;Jaan Kanellis&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jaankanellis.com/google-publicly-attacking-paid-links-againstop/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Publicly Attacking Paid Links Again?Stop Already&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is completely ridiculous that people can simple move results where ever they want by only looking at how attractive the title and description are. Google gives webmasters zero control on how your title and description appears in the SERPs yet this is how most that use Search Wiki will judge. No one is going to go back and forth from SERP to website to take the time to rank websites. They will be moving websites around by the way they appear in the SERPs. I think that problem alone is not getting enough coverage and is far more troubling than the fact that this feature is being force feed to the webmaster community. I say webmaster community because let’s face it, how many other really have a Google account anyways.</p>
<p><em>Jaan Kanellis&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.jaankanellis.com/google-publicly-attacking-paid-links-againstop/' rel="nofollow">Google Publicly Attacking Paid Links Again?Stop Already</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best CD Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/11/googles-searchwiki-is-here-to-stay-is-this-the-death-of-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-60914</link>
		<dc:creator>Best CD Rates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=6655#comment-60914</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t think its going to be a problem at all. It may be for people that have spam type sites, but for people that build sites for small niches its not going to be much of a difference in search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think its going to be a problem at all. It may be for people that have spam type sites, but for people that build sites for small niches its not going to be much of a difference in search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
