<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Introduces Preferred Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:33:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Der SEOdiotische Wochenrückblick - KW04 &#38; 05/2009 &#124; Der SEOdiot</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66993</link>
		<dc:creator>Der SEOdiotische Wochenrückblick - KW04 &#38; 05/2009 &#124; Der SEOdiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66993</guid>
		<description>[...] Beal - Google Personalisierung geht weiter mit &#8220;Preferred Sites&#8221; Interessant zu wissen wäre, ob das einfach nur die selbst angegebenen Websites pusht - oder ob [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beal &#8211; Google Personalisierung geht weiter mit &#8220;Preferred Sites&#8221; Interessant zu wissen wäre, ob das einfach nur die selbst angegebenen Websites pusht &#8211; oder ob [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66432</link>
		<dc:creator>poer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66432</guid>
		<description>google web2.0 is scary, if people start to use this, is seo will still work?

&lt;em&gt;poer&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ihostingcoupons/~3/YkE9hSWmiv0/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HostPapa Coupon Code 10% OFF for January 2009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google web2.0 is scary, if people start to use this, is seo will still work?</p>
<p><em>poer&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ihostingcoupons/~3/YkE9hSWmiv0/' rel="nofollow">HostPapa Coupon Code 10% OFF for January 2009</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66430</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66430</guid>
		<description>Hey Jayson

Totally agree with you.  Everyone I have spoken to who is not a webmaster or involved in SEO says they will not use this option. They want to see what results will come up for their search not the sites they already know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jayson</p>
<p>Totally agree with you.  Everyone I have spoken to who is not a webmaster or involved in SEO says they will not use this option. They want to see what results will come up for their search not the sites they already know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saurav</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66422</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66422</guid>
		<description>If I knew where to go to find the information I am looking for, I would go there instead of going to Google to find the info. But then it could just be me. 

When SearchWiki came out I asked a lot of my friends if they knew &quot;what it is?&quot; To my surprise most of them said &quot;NO&quot;. Preferred site feature could go the same way with many user not actually being aware of this additional feature. If we have only a handful of people using these personalized features then the overall impact it has on mainstream search is minimal. If this be the case, then the situation remains the way it was before these features were introduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I knew where to go to find the information I am looking for, I would go there instead of going to Google to find the info. But then it could just be me. </p>
<p>When SearchWiki came out I asked a lot of my friends if they knew &#8220;what it is?&#8221; To my surprise most of them said &#8220;NO&#8221;. Preferred site feature could go the same way with many user not actually being aware of this additional feature. If we have only a handful of people using these personalized features then the overall impact it has on mainstream search is minimal. If this be the case, then the situation remains the way it was before these features were introduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66409</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66409</guid>
		<description>This could be a nice feature, but the biggest problem is SEO as some suggested.  It will be hard to make it in top search results for smaller sites just because they are not considered preferred.

&lt;em&gt;Patrick&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/01/shower-calculator-updated/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shower Calculator Updated&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a nice feature, but the biggest problem is SEO as some suggested.  It will be hard to make it in top search results for smaller sites just because they are not considered preferred.</p>
<p><em>Patrick&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/01/shower-calculator-updated/' rel="nofollow">Shower Calculator Updated</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gennaro</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66377</link>
		<dc:creator>Gennaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66377</guid>
		<description>As long as it&#039;s optional there&#039;s no harm. I hope this won&#039;t impact overall rank though. I don&#039;t want to see turn into a ratings system with everyone fighting to get people to put their blog on. Though that might happen regardless.

&lt;em&gt;Gennaro&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.enduringwanderlust.com/8-presidential-inauguration-locations-to-visit/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8 Presidential Inauguration Locations To Visit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as it&#8217;s optional there&#8217;s no harm. I hope this won&#8217;t impact overall rank though. I don&#8217;t want to see turn into a ratings system with everyone fighting to get people to put their blog on. Though that might happen regardless.</p>
<p><em>Gennaro&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.enduringwanderlust.com/8-presidential-inauguration-locations-to-visit/' rel="nofollow">8 Presidential Inauguration Locations To Visit</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenney and Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66376</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenney and Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66376</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  I think it&#039;s cool, but...  Glad this is still in &quot;beta&quot;, lol.  

This will definitely make SEO harder.  But it&#039;s the same stuff we&#039;ve been saying, you need good content.  Give your readers a reason why they would want to say good things about you and come back.  Also means that diversifying traffic sources will be important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  I think it&#8217;s cool, but&#8230;  Glad this is still in &#8220;beta&#8221;, lol.  </p>
<p>This will definitely make SEO harder.  But it&#8217;s the same stuff we&#8217;ve been saying, you need good content.  Give your readers a reason why they would want to say good things about you and come back.  Also means that diversifying traffic sources will be important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mescher</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66364</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mescher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66364</guid>
		<description>Is Google opening up Pandora&#039;s box?

Will these new personalized search results affect paid results? (My guess is no).

If widespread adoption takes place, the SEO game is sure to change.  Then again, perhaps being able to find even more relevant information will &#039;democratize&#039; the distribution of well written information.

Whatever the case, I love how Google keeps us on our toes!

&lt;em&gt;Joe Mescher&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.firstcollegenowwhat.com/2009/01/successful-website/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Some Assembly Required For Building a Successful Website&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Google opening up Pandora&#8217;s box?</p>
<p>Will these new personalized search results affect paid results? (My guess is no).</p>
<p>If widespread adoption takes place, the SEO game is sure to change.  Then again, perhaps being able to find even more relevant information will &#8216;democratize&#8217; the distribution of well written information.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, I love how Google keeps us on our toes!</p>
<p><em>Joe Mescher&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.firstcollegenowwhat.com/2009/01/successful-website/' rel="nofollow">Some Assembly Required For Building a Successful Website</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66353</guid>
		<description>These personalized search features just don&#039;t make sense to me. Kinda sorta seems like they&#039;re making search less important. It seems silly to use a search engine to search websites you&#039;re familar with and that you already know about? Maybe I&#039;m missing something...probably am, usually do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These personalized search features just don&#8217;t make sense to me. Kinda sorta seems like they&#8217;re making search less important. It seems silly to use a search engine to search websites you&#8217;re familar with and that you already know about? Maybe I&#8217;m missing something&#8230;probably am, usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66347</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66347</guid>
		<description>I have a few thoughts on this.  By doing this Google is essentially taking a lot of pressure of its algorithm to determine the most relevant results for a given search.  Even though the results are going to be user specific, I wonder how this info will be used in future index updates, if at all.  I&#039;m thinking it has to come into play somehow.  This is going to go against most SEOs that are gaming the index by generating backlinks.  I also wonder why Google didn&#039;t also allow users to tag sites that they prefer.

&lt;em&gt;Kevin&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://likesocool.com/index.php/7-tips-to-rule-local-search/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;7 Tips to Rule Local Paid Search&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few thoughts on this.  By doing this Google is essentially taking a lot of pressure of its algorithm to determine the most relevant results for a given search.  Even though the results are going to be user specific, I wonder how this info will be used in future index updates, if at all.  I&#8217;m thinking it has to come into play somehow.  This is going to go against most SEOs that are gaming the index by generating backlinks.  I also wonder why Google didn&#8217;t also allow users to tag sites that they prefer.</p>
<p><em>Kevin&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://likesocool.com/index.php/7-tips-to-rule-local-search/' rel="nofollow">7 Tips to Rule Local Paid Search</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-introduces-preferred-sites.html/comment-page-1#comment-66344</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7748#comment-66344</guid>
		<description>I guess this is another addition to the new Search Wiki feature which allows users to have &#039;favorite&#039; sites which are promoted... This just gives a few more options.

&lt;em&gt;Shirley&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VelvetBluesBlog/~3/516592743/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Choosing the Best Location for Your New Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this is another addition to the new Search Wiki feature which allows users to have &#8216;favorite&#8217; sites which are promoted&#8230; This just gives a few more options.</p>
<p><em>Shirley&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VelvetBluesBlog/~3/516592743/' rel="nofollow">Choosing the Best Location for Your New Blog</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
