Comments on: Google Talks Chrome 2.0 and the Delay for Mac/Linux Compatibility http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Vanetino http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-66221 Vanetino Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:04:51 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-66221 is a wonderful tool is a wonderful tool

]]> By: DF Marketing SEO http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-66129 DF Marketing SEO Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:26:04 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-66129 Yup, I am sticking with FireFox Yup, I am sticking with FireFox

]]> By: Jacques Seoman http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65901 Jacques Seoman Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:18:25 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65901 Google sure ain't resting on their laurels with Chrome. Version 2 already, and with much more to come, that's for sure. I find Chrome very handy as a bare basics, speedy browser but the extra features and functionality definitely will be useful. Google sure ain’t resting on their laurels with Chrome. Version 2 already, and with much more to come, that’s for sure. I find Chrome very handy as a bare basics, speedy browser but the extra features and functionality definitely will be useful.

]]> By: John http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65795 John Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:51:23 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65795 in everyday use of chrome, the time they have fixed issues, i already made some connection on this browser, loading fast than other browser. <em>John's last blog post..<a href='http://www.thewhitehatter.com/busby-seo-test-the-hard-way/' rel="nofollow">Busby SEO Test the hard way</a></em> in everyday use of chrome, the time they have fixed issues, i already made some connection on this browser, loading fast than other browser.

John’s last blog post..Busby SEO Test the hard way

]]> By: Wii http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65728 Wii Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:14:40 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65728 I tried to use chrome when the 1st beta came out but didn't really like it and haven't been ready to try the newer versions yet. I think I may have a dabble with 2.0 Firefox is still the browser of choice for me and the plugins available for it are really good. I tried to use chrome when the 1st beta came out but didn’t really like it and haven’t been ready to try the newer versions yet. I think I may have a dabble with 2.0

Firefox is still the browser of choice for me and the plugins available for it are really good.

]]> By: Tony http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65662 Tony Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:33:48 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65662 I'm quite surprised so far at how well Chrome has been received. Safari and Opera on Windows were not that well received when they first came out. But Chrome seems to be doing not too badly. Probably because Google learned from the mistakes made by those 2 browsers. I've yet to try Chrome, however I'm getting more annoyed at how much resources Firefox uses up so maybe I'll try Chrome 2.0 and see what's it's like. But will Chrome ever take over IE or Firefox? Personally I don't think so, as long as Firefox keeps doing things right. I’m quite surprised so far at how well Chrome has been received. Safari and Opera on Windows were not that well received when they first came out. But Chrome seems to be doing not too badly. Probably because Google learned from the mistakes made by those 2 browsers. I’ve yet to try Chrome, however I’m getting more annoyed at how much resources Firefox uses up so maybe I’ll try Chrome 2.0 and see what’s it’s like. But will Chrome ever take over IE or Firefox? Personally I don’t think so, as long as Firefox keeps doing things right.

]]> By: Goran Web Design http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65615 Goran Web Design Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:25:26 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65615 who the heck is this Leonardo guy!? Bugger off and stop spamming! Anyway, I persoanlly am quite a fan of Google Chrome, I personally use Firefox first and foremost but managed to convert my girlfriend to Chrome from IE (she doesn't like Firefox 'cos it's not simple enough). as for the "not scrolling" problem you mentioned, I've never experienced that myself?? who the heck is this Leonardo guy!? Bugger off and stop spamming!
Anyway, I persoanlly am quite a fan of Google Chrome, I personally use Firefox first and foremost but managed to convert my girlfriend to Chrome from IE (she doesn’t like Firefox ‘cos it’s not simple enough).
as for the “not scrolling” problem you mentioned, I’ve never experienced that myself??

]]> By: Utah SEO Pro http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65533 Utah SEO Pro Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:45:51 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65533 Chrome 3.0 = open source plugins? c'mon.. <em>Utah SEO Pro's last blog post..<a href='http://www.jordankasteler.com/utah-seo-pro-blog/interview-with-utah-seo-pro/' rel="nofollow">An Interview with Utah SEO Pro (Jordan Kasteler) by Martin Bowling</a></em> Chrome 3.0 = open source plugins? c’mon..

Utah SEO Pro’s last blog post..An Interview with Utah SEO Pro (Jordan Kasteler) by Martin Bowling

]]> By: PS3 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65519 PS3 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:10:58 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65519 I agree with Nicole in general terms, FF is great, albeit the current version seems to hog more resources than ever before. I agree with Nicole in general terms, FF is great, albeit the current version seems to hog more resources than ever before.

]]> By: Saad Kamal http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65506 Saad Kamal Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:14:07 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65506 I have updated it. The changes are hardly anything that I would have noticed myself... <em>Saad Kamal's last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/saadkamal/~3/Dtytdr9Zu0Y/' rel="nofollow">Google Dumped by Firefox for Yandex</a></em> I have updated it. The changes are hardly anything that I would have noticed myself…

Saad Kamal’s last blog post..Google Dumped by Firefox for Yandex

]]> By: Tony Lawrence http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65468 Tony Lawrence Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:09:32 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65468 "sidebar isn’t loading properly on IE" Hardly unusual and it's seldom that there really is anything wrong with the page: it's the Microsoft programmers doing their usual high quality job of paying no attention to standards. I think more than a few of us are now saying the heck with it - we're no longer bothering to bloat our pages with the extra junk necessary to fix Microsoft's lousy browsers. My site's right hand column "breaks" in IE too and I just don't care anymore: only 31% of my traffic uses IE and it is decreasing all the time. I *could* fix it, but I'm not going to bother. Let Microsoft fix its browsers, I say, and until then those of you who insist on using their junk get a bad experience.. I don't know if this site feels the same way, but I wouldn't be surprised. “sidebar isn’t loading properly on IE”

Hardly unusual and it’s seldom that there really is anything wrong with the page: it’s the Microsoft programmers doing their usual high quality job of paying no attention to standards.

I think more than a few of us are now saying the heck with it – we’re no longer bothering to bloat our pages with the extra junk necessary to fix Microsoft’s lousy browsers. My site’s right hand column “breaks” in IE too and I just don’t care anymore: only 31% of my traffic uses IE and it is decreasing all the time. I *could* fix it, but I’m not going to bother. Let Microsoft fix its browsers, I say, and until then those of you who insist on using their junk get a bad experience..

I don’t know if this site feels the same way, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

]]> By: Quilmes Verano http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65467 Quilmes Verano Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:09:53 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65467 Don't know if this is the place for this, but I wanted to let you guys know that your sidebar isn't loading properly on IE, that's all. :) Don’t know if this is the place for this, but I wanted to let you guys know that your sidebar isn’t loading properly on IE, that’s all. :)

]]> By: Shirley http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65451 Shirley Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:05:48 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65451 I wonder when they will add support for Mac and Linux. Chrome seems to target techy people or web developers that are more likely to be using Linux operating systems, so support for Linux is key. Funny, you mention that Google is 'lagging behind' in this regard. But IE browsers dropped support for Mac a few years ago... <em>Shirley's last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/VelvetBluesBlog/~3/507817805/' rel="nofollow">Google Chrome 2.0: Are You Ready?</a></em> I wonder when they will add support for Mac and Linux. Chrome seems to target techy people or web developers that are more likely to be using Linux operating systems, so support for Linux is key.

Funny, you mention that Google is ‘lagging behind’ in this regard. But IE browsers dropped support for Mac a few years ago…

Shirley’s last blog post..Google Chrome 2.0: Are You Ready?

]]> By: Nicole Price http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65449 Nicole Price Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:34:29 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65449 When Firefox is performing so well, why on earth would I want to change unless there are offerings that are not available in FF? <em>Nicole Price's last blog post..<a href='http://www.greatpriceshere.com/2009/01/09/good-deals-on-hair-products/' rel="nofollow">Good Deals on Hair Products</a></em> When Firefox is performing so well, why on earth would I want to change unless there are offerings that are not available in FF?

Nicole Price’s last blog post..Good Deals on Hair Products

]]> By: Patrick http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65447 Patrick Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:20:51 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65447 I still don't get Google's incentive with this browser. If they are still funding Mozilla, then why do they continue to make their browser. It will be interesting to see the competition between Chrome and Firefox as Chrome gets further developed. <em>Patrick's last blog post..<a href='http://www.paystolivegreen.com/2009/01/are-we-eating-too-much-meat/' rel="nofollow">Are We Eating Too Much Meat?</a></em> I still don’t get Google’s incentive with this browser. If they are still funding Mozilla, then why do they continue to make their browser. It will be interesting to see the competition between Chrome and Firefox as Chrome gets further developed.

Patrick’s last blog post..Are We Eating Too Much Meat?

]]> By: Tony Lawrence http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65444 Tony Lawrence Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:25:59 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65444 "Having Chrome for Mac/Linus users is all well and good, but does anybody actually want to use google chrome" Maybe. As much as I love Firefox for its extensions and crash recovery features, it does frequently lock up on me or slow down. I often have to quit out or throw away preferences (Mac OS X) to get it back. If Chrome had plugins and didn't lockup/slow down, yeah, I'd want it. If Firefox did not have that "restore tabs" feature now, I wouldn't use it because of how often it crashes. “Having Chrome for Mac/Linus users is all well and good, but does anybody actually want to use google chrome”

Maybe. As much as I love Firefox for its extensions and crash recovery features, it does frequently lock up on me or slow down. I often have to quit out or throw away preferences (Mac OS X) to get it back.

If Chrome had plugins and didn’t lockup/slow down, yeah, I’d want it. If Firefox did not have that “restore tabs” feature now, I wouldn’t use it because of how often it crashes.

]]> By: Milo http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65443 Milo Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:06:44 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65443 Having Chrome for Mac/Linus users is all well and good, but does anybody actually want to use google chrome? Having Chrome for Mac/Linus users is all well and good, but does anybody actually want to use google chrome?

]]> By: R&B Love Songs http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65431 R&B Love Songs Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:14:44 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65431 Plug ins would be a big step in convincing me to adopt Chrome. Still, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. And firefox hasn't done me no wrong so far. Plug ins would be a big step in convincing me to adopt Chrome. Still, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. And firefox hasn’t done me no wrong so far.

]]> By: Silvia http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65427 Silvia Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:22:36 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65427 I think highly of them and the progress they are making. I think highly of them and the progress they are making.

]]> By: Matt Cutts http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/01/google-talks-chrome-20-and-the-delay-for-maclinux-compatibility.html/comment-page-1#comment-65421 Matt Cutts Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:35:06 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=7628#comment-65421 "Google admits that progress is lagging behind." I haven't see Google say that--would you mind point out a source for that? From my perspective they're moving pretty quickly, given they only announced Chrome at all in September. <em>Matt Cutts's last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.mattcutts.com/~r/mattcutts/uJBW/~3/506320767/' rel="nofollow">Ideal conference badge</a></em> “Google admits that progress is lagging behind.”

I haven’t see Google say that–would you mind point out a source for that? From my perspective they’re moving pretty quickly, given they only announced Chrome at all in September.

Matt Cutts’s last blog post..Ideal conference badge

]]>