<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On-Site Duplicate Content No More: Canonical URL Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:02:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NYC Cafe</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67761</link>
		<dc:creator>NYC Cafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67761</guid>
		<description>This could be a little help with keyword mapping and actually pagerank sculpting on pages with a lot of similar content.

&lt;em&gt;NYC Cafe&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://centurycafe.com/484/flowers-check/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Want Flowers on a Cake - Check out this !!!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a little help with keyword mapping and actually pagerank sculpting on pages with a lot of similar content.</p>
<p><em>NYC Cafe&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://centurycafe.com/484/flowers-check/' rel="nofollow">Want Flowers on a Cake &#8211; Check out this !!!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67760</guid>
		<description>I am using this as of today with the new canonical name (SEO NO DUPLICATE) wordpress plugin.  You can check it out at the wordpress.org plugin page.

It seems to work.  It also seems way to easy a solution.

The fact remains that it is completely valid to index your content in multiple ways depending on the visitor or the site section they are in.  Multiply indexes and you multiply content.  It&#039;s a sticky wicket.

Thanks for this post.  It helped me.

&lt;em&gt;Dave Williams&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewTechnologyYouShouldKnowAbout/~3/M9JxEowgC0o/windows-7&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft Windows 7 Beta - Game, Application and Utility Compatibility - What’s Stable &amp; Works, What’s Doesn’t Work and What To Do About It!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using this as of today with the new canonical name (SEO NO DUPLICATE) wordpress plugin.  You can check it out at the wordpress.org plugin page.</p>
<p>It seems to work.  It also seems way to easy a solution.</p>
<p>The fact remains that it is completely valid to index your content in multiple ways depending on the visitor or the site section they are in.  Multiply indexes and you multiply content.  It&#8217;s a sticky wicket.</p>
<p>Thanks for this post.  It helped me.</p>
<p><em>Dave Williams&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewTechnologyYouShouldKnowAbout/~3/M9JxEowgC0o/windows-7' rel="nofollow">Microsoft Windows 7 Beta &#8211; Game, Application and Utility Compatibility &#8211; What’s Stable &amp; Works, What’s Doesn’t Work and What To Do About It!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Aspinall</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67759</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Aspinall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67759</guid>
		<description>What if you have two blogs with the same article? We are looking to replicate our website for another country, make tweaks to case studies and services based on our service offering for that country, but were looking to use duplicate blog articles.... not all the time but sometimes. How would this help? Or is it best to not even consider it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you have two blogs with the same article? We are looking to replicate our website for another country, make tweaks to case studies and services based on our service offering for that country, but were looking to use duplicate blog articles&#8230;. not all the time but sometimes. How would this help? Or is it best to not even consider it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley - Velvet Blues</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67738</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley - Velvet Blues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67738</guid>
		<description>Well this is useful for us bloggers who use excerpts or full posts on our index or archive pages.

&lt;em&gt;Shirley - Velvet Blues&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.velvetblues.com/web-development-blog/search-engine-optimization-seo-expert/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Your Search Engine Optimization Expert Legit?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is useful for us bloggers who use excerpts or full posts on our index or archive pages.</p>
<p><em>Shirley &#8211; Velvet Blues&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.velvetblues.com/web-development-blog/search-engine-optimization-seo-expert/' rel="nofollow">Is Your Search Engine Optimization Expert Legit?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedownloadsok.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67722</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedownloadsok.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67722</guid>
		<description>I just hear this tag from this blog. I think i have to learn more about this tag..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hear this tag from this blog. I think i have to learn more about this tag..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ogletree</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67691</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ogletree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67691</guid>
		<description>If your site is static then you don&#039;t need this tag.  It is only for static sites.  If you have dup problems on your static site just delete the duplicate pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your site is static then you don&#8217;t need this tag.  It is only for static sites.  If you have dup problems on your static site just delete the duplicate pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67690</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67690</guid>
		<description>So, what if the site is not dynamic? That may be quite a costly exercise to put all of that into code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what if the site is not dynamic? That may be quite a costly exercise to put all of that into code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our SEO Company&#8217;s Links of the Week</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67668</link>
		<dc:creator>Our SEO Company&#8217;s Links of the Week</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67668</guid>
		<description>[...] Pilgrim covers the latest announcement from Google, Yahoo, and MSN, the new canonical URL tag.SugarRae has an excellent review of PRWeb&#8217;s various offerings (we&#8217;re PRWeb fans as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pilgrim covers the latest announcement from Google, Yahoo, and MSN, the new canonical URL tag.SugarRae has an excellent review of PRWeb&#8217;s various offerings (we&#8217;re PRWeb fans as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf? (Duplicate Content Stuff)</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67665</link>
		<dc:creator>Who's Afraid Of The Big Bad Wolf? (Duplicate Content Stuff)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67665</guid>
		<description>[...] the SERPS are starting to recognize and hopefully accept to reduce on-site duplicate content.   On-Site Duplicate Content No More: Canonical URL Tag  All the best, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the SERPS are starting to recognize and hopefully accept to reduce on-site duplicate content.   On-Site Duplicate Content No More: Canonical URL Tag  All the best, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ogletree</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/on-site-duplicate-content-no-more-canonical-url-tag.html/comment-page-1#comment-67663</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ogletree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8167#comment-67663</guid>
		<description>This tag is going to be nice to have but I still think you should enforce URL&#039;s.  You should know every possible URL that can be access on your site.  It should be impossible to bring up the same content with more than one URL.  There should be a system in place that 301 redirects any attempt to access content with the wrong URL.   Matt Cutts told me one day that it is a good idea to also enforce capitals.  The best way is to just make sure all url&#039;s are lower case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tag is going to be nice to have but I still think you should enforce URL&#8217;s.  You should know every possible URL that can be access on your site.  It should be impossible to bring up the same content with more than one URL.  There should be a system in place that 301 redirects any attempt to access content with the wrong URL.   Matt Cutts told me one day that it is a good idea to also enforce capitals.  The best way is to just make sure all url&#8217;s are lower case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
