<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Changes Brains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:44:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew - MS Access Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68676</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew - MS Access Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68676</guid>
		<description>I think one needs to use common sense and Structure the young ones time on the web. I also think one should monitor where they go.
My children were not allowed to converse or multi play until their pre-teens. I saw no benefit in doing otherwise and many adverse issues for the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one needs to use common sense and Structure the young ones time on the web. I also think one should monitor where they go.<br />
My children were not allowed to converse or multi play until their pre-teens. I saw no benefit in doing otherwise and many adverse issues for the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid&#8217;s Brains Affected By Social Media &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid&#8217;s Brains Affected By Social Media &#124; SEO Backlinking - SEO and Online Reputation Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68599</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Social Media Making You Anti-Social? &#124; Search Marketing Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68586</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Social Media Making You Anti-Social? &#124; Search Marketing Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68586</guid>
		<description>[...] Frank Reed over at Marketing Pilgrim wrote earlier this week about a statement by Oxford neuroscientist Susan Greenfield that social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter MAY negatively affect children&#8217;s attention spans and social skills.  Greenfield cites the observation by many teachers that students are having a harder time relating to one another and are no longer taking time to plan their essays before beginning to write. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frank Reed over at Marketing Pilgrim wrote earlier this week about a statement by Oxford neuroscientist Susan Greenfield that social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter MAY negatively affect children&#8217;s attention spans and social skills.  Greenfield cites the observation by many teachers that students are having a harder time relating to one another and are no longer taking time to plan their essays before beginning to write. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kid&#8217;s Brains Affected By Social Media : virtual gambling</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68482</link>
		<dc:creator>Kid&#8217;s Brains Affected By Social Media : virtual gambling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68482</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Important Tidbits from around the Web &#124; Search Marketing Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68465</link>
		<dc:creator>Important Tidbits from around the Web &#124; Search Marketing Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68465</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media Changes Brains [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media Changes Brains [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oded Noy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68397</link>
		<dc:creator>Oded Noy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68397</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. I guess at the end of the day, its all about education. The idea of Social interaction is not new... the idea of using tools to communicate is not new either. 

Kids in general have shortened attention span. I heard in NPR a research (sorry forgot he exact source - sorry) that 7 year-old kids today have the same concentration ability as 5 year-old did 40 years ago. The main point there was all about kids not have unstructured play.

My 4 1/2 year old preferred YouTube over regular TV. He can control the pace and what he watches. Although he gets more &#039;instant gratification&#039; he is also much more engaged and active than watching TV.

I guess the rest is all about education and parental involvement around the activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I guess at the end of the day, its all about education. The idea of Social interaction is not new&#8230; the idea of using tools to communicate is not new either. </p>
<p>Kids in general have shortened attention span. I heard in NPR a research (sorry forgot he exact source &#8211; sorry) that 7 year-old kids today have the same concentration ability as 5 year-old did 40 years ago. The main point there was all about kids not have unstructured play.</p>
<p>My 4 1/2 year old preferred YouTube over regular TV. He can control the pace and what he watches. Although he gets more &#8216;instant gratification&#8217; he is also much more engaged and active than watching TV.</p>
<p>I guess the rest is all about education and parental involvement around the activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f0ul</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68362</link>
		<dc:creator>f0ul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68362</guid>
		<description>I think this is just an issue being seen the wrong end of the telescope - for agenda reasons!

If there is more information being thrown everywhere, then it takes a greater skill to be able to spot the important stuff and dump the rest.  

The skill of the Net generation is to be able to put an idea into a sentence - rather than 500 words!  you get the idea by just looking, and the indepth analysis by clicking.

 The biggest problem kids are going to get in real life, there is no ability to  delete an opposing view - and how will they learn to argue their case without getting violent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is just an issue being seen the wrong end of the telescope &#8211; for agenda reasons!</p>
<p>If there is more information being thrown everywhere, then it takes a greater skill to be able to spot the important stuff and dump the rest.  </p>
<p>The skill of the Net generation is to be able to put an idea into a sentence &#8211; rather than 500 words!  you get the idea by just looking, and the indepth analysis by clicking.</p>
<p> The biggest problem kids are going to get in real life, there is no ability to  delete an opposing view &#8211; and how will they learn to argue their case without getting violent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Burkot</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68357</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Burkot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68357</guid>
		<description>I agree with many of your points, especially technology impacting communication and leading our society to value quantity of relationships over quality. I think this is easily demonstrated in new fads like texting. Even when it would be quicker to pick up the phone and have a 2 minute conversation, rather than spending 20 minutes texting back and forth, texting has become the norm. This is because our generation has come to value communication that does not require face-to-face contact. It&#039;s easier that way. Sure, the quality of the relationships isn&#039;t as good, but today&#039;s technology has taught us to value convenience, and that&#039;s what texting and so many other fads bring us.

&lt;em&gt;Rachel Burkot&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/invesp/~3/W4yiSGS62Vw/how-to-understand-buyer-motivation-without-telepathy-start-with-keywords.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Understand Buyer Motivation Without Telepathy: Start with Keywords&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many of your points, especially technology impacting communication and leading our society to value quantity of relationships over quality. I think this is easily demonstrated in new fads like texting. Even when it would be quicker to pick up the phone and have a 2 minute conversation, rather than spending 20 minutes texting back and forth, texting has become the norm. This is because our generation has come to value communication that does not require face-to-face contact. It&#8217;s easier that way. Sure, the quality of the relationships isn&#8217;t as good, but today&#8217;s technology has taught us to value convenience, and that&#8217;s what texting and so many other fads bring us.</p>
<p><em>Rachel Burkot&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/invesp/~3/W4yiSGS62Vw/how-to-understand-buyer-motivation-without-telepathy-start-with-keywords.html' rel="nofollow">How to Understand Buyer Motivation Without Telepathy: Start with Keywords</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68354</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68354</guid>
		<description>Looks like we struck a neuron here. Thanks for all of your POV&#039;s

@ Andy Catsimanes - I am still laughing from your response. Can&#039;t remember why.....just laughing.

@ Joe Hall - considering real science and research requires time to gather and observe I suspect we  will have to wait for something that a &#039;scientist&#039; would accept. I&#039;m not sure we have the patience though ;-)

@ Graham Jones  - theories will abound on both sides of the argument for sure. Having been a teacher at one point in my life (before the Internet played the role it does now) I can attest to the shortened attention spans and the negative impact on the cognitive abilities of children across the board

@ Jeff I hear you for sure. I learned this morning that as a cost cutting and efficiency matter there are more weeding invitations being e-mailed. While the traditional ones are often overdone I have to say that an e-mail invite is so sterile that it takes away from the importance and depersonalizes one of the most important things many folks do

@ Nishi we are all part of the Internet generation to one degree or another I suppose. 

@Brandon I have simply tried to help my kids keep the Internet in perspective. There is ALWAYS the chance to have too much of a good thing with anything. Proper perspective helps to shape action for them.

@ Nick Stamoulis - kids are definitely communicating, there is no doubt about that. The question is when does communication become a relationship and by whose definition?  

Thanks to everyone for checking in

&lt;em&gt;Frank Reed&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.frankthinking.com/be-armed-with-internet-marketing-knowledge/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Be Armed With Internet Marketing Knowledge&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we struck a neuron here. Thanks for all of your POV&#8217;s</p>
<p>@ Andy Catsimanes &#8211; I am still laughing from your response. Can&#8217;t remember why&#8230;..just laughing.</p>
<p>@ Joe Hall &#8211; considering real science and research requires time to gather and observe I suspect we  will have to wait for something that a &#8217;scientist&#8217; would accept. I&#8217;m not sure we have the patience though <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@ Graham Jones  &#8211; theories will abound on both sides of the argument for sure. Having been a teacher at one point in my life (before the Internet played the role it does now) I can attest to the shortened attention spans and the negative impact on the cognitive abilities of children across the board</p>
<p>@ Jeff I hear you for sure. I learned this morning that as a cost cutting and efficiency matter there are more weeding invitations being e-mailed. While the traditional ones are often overdone I have to say that an e-mail invite is so sterile that it takes away from the importance and depersonalizes one of the most important things many folks do</p>
<p>@ Nishi we are all part of the Internet generation to one degree or another I suppose. </p>
<p>@Brandon I have simply tried to help my kids keep the Internet in perspective. There is ALWAYS the chance to have too much of a good thing with anything. Proper perspective helps to shape action for them.</p>
<p>@ Nick Stamoulis &#8211; kids are definitely communicating, there is no doubt about that. The question is when does communication become a relationship and by whose definition?  </p>
<p>Thanks to everyone for checking in</p>
<p><em>Frank Reed&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.frankthinking.com/be-armed-with-internet-marketing-knowledge/' rel="nofollow">Be Armed With Internet Marketing Knowledge</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alun John</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68353</link>
		<dc:creator>Alun John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68353</guid>
		<description>This article caught my eye through someone&#039;s Tweet! I suppose the fact that it was published in the Daily Mail says much about the angle the author is coming from and how much you can actually believe it. The simple truth is yes, our children are using, and are going to use, Social Media for all commumications. The key in learning is to teach them how to use it in the right way and to make sure it is not to the detriment of their other communications skills. 

On another note it was quite interesting to see how the Daily Mail wrote about the govt&#039;s recent announcement of a new Digital Director. It was very dismissive and focused mainly on the £160k salary, which was actually advertised as between £80-160k - quite a difference. Alarmingly 2 out of the 57 comments praised the govt and Social Media and they were rated by readers of the Mail as poor (the only ones to be rated this way). All other comments completely dismissed Social Media. The worry is that the public (albeit Tory in this case) is starting to believe the nonsense the Mail is spouting!

&lt;em&gt;Alun John&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.marketingtom.com/2009/02/beware-web-developers-who-know-nada.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Beware Web Developers Who Know Nada!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article caught my eye through someone&#8217;s Tweet! I suppose the fact that it was published in the Daily Mail says much about the angle the author is coming from and how much you can actually believe it. The simple truth is yes, our children are using, and are going to use, Social Media for all commumications. The key in learning is to teach them how to use it in the right way and to make sure it is not to the detriment of their other communications skills. </p>
<p>On another note it was quite interesting to see how the Daily Mail wrote about the govt&#8217;s recent announcement of a new Digital Director. It was very dismissive and focused mainly on the £160k salary, which was actually advertised as between £80-160k &#8211; quite a difference. Alarmingly 2 out of the 57 comments praised the govt and Social Media and they were rated by readers of the Mail as poor (the only ones to be rated this way). All other comments completely dismissed Social Media. The worry is that the public (albeit Tory in this case) is starting to believe the nonsense the Mail is spouting!</p>
<p><em>Alun John&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.marketingtom.com/2009/02/beware-web-developers-who-know-nada.html' rel="nofollow">Beware Web Developers Who Know Nada!</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68351</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68351</guid>
		<description>Great article!  I think this study has its valid points, but overall I feel that kids are learning how to communicate using the #1 area that they will use throughout most the of their lives...the web/social media outlets...

Older generations remember the times that if you wanted to speak to someone it would be over the phone, mail or in person...for networking it was done in person.  I think the web has helped people become (different) but better communicators.  Anyway that is my 2 cents :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I think this study has its valid points, but overall I feel that kids are learning how to communicate using the #1 area that they will use throughout most the of their lives&#8230;the web/social media outlets&#8230;</p>
<p>Older generations remember the times that if you wanted to speak to someone it would be over the phone, mail or in person&#8230;for networking it was done in person.  I think the web has helped people become (different) but better communicators.  Anyway that is my 2 cents <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Walker - Best Wordpress Templates</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68338</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Walker - Best Wordpress Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68338</guid>
		<description>To be honest I think the internet is taking over kids lives. It&#039;s only recently that the internet has become a big thing. Kids are just growing up accepting it like it was always there, but in fact it&#039;s only really become a big thing in the last 10 years or so.

&lt;em&gt;Brandon Walker - Best Wordpress Templates&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.starwpthemes.com/best-wordpress-themes/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Daily Planet - Best Wordpress Themes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I think the internet is taking over kids lives. It&#8217;s only recently that the internet has become a big thing. Kids are just growing up accepting it like it was always there, but in fact it&#8217;s only really become a big thing in the last 10 years or so.</p>
<p><em>Brandon Walker &#8211; Best Wordpress Templates&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.starwpthemes.com/best-wordpress-themes/' rel="nofollow">Daily Planet &#8211; Best Wordpress Themes</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68328</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68328</guid>
		<description>This is a great post! I would offer, though, that if there is a Net Generation, that it&#039;s reach is much farther than just the under 30 year-olds, and that in fact people of older ages - while they are more linear in cognitive patters of processing - some are rapid adopters of a more networked and data-rich world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post! I would offer, though, that if there is a Net Generation, that it&#8217;s reach is much farther than just the under 30 year-olds, and that in fact people of older ages &#8211; while they are more linear in cognitive patters of processing &#8211; some are rapid adopters of a more networked and data-rich world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68325</guid>
		<description>Frank,

While it&#039;s obviously far too early to evaluate any long term changes in brain development resulting from the use of these applications/technologies (regardless of age), I see plenty of anecdotal evidence of interpersonal behavioral changes over the past few years that bothers me.

In business especially, I see people (but predominantly younger people) substituting texting for a phone call or personal meeting where the later is clearly necessary to deliver &amp; receive deeper information &amp; context than could ever be exchanged via text messages. The typical response is &quot;why should I waste my time calling or meeting when I can just text?&quot; The end result is that in many cases these people fall behind, or at least trail others that have developed good interpersonal social skills. And the funniest part is that they have no idea why their lack of social skills might inhibit their professional career tracks. They don&#039;t understand the value of relationships in business, and that relationships are bonded in personal interaction.

I&#039;ll leave it up to the researchers to determine the long-term effects of brain development / concentration / etc. but I&#039;m with you on the issue of real relationships. Technology is great and it has many, many benefits in both personal and professional life. But let&#039;s not forget about the need for and benefits of the development of solid social skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s obviously far too early to evaluate any long term changes in brain development resulting from the use of these applications/technologies (regardless of age), I see plenty of anecdotal evidence of interpersonal behavioral changes over the past few years that bothers me.</p>
<p>In business especially, I see people (but predominantly younger people) substituting texting for a phone call or personal meeting where the later is clearly necessary to deliver &amp; receive deeper information &amp; context than could ever be exchanged via text messages. The typical response is &#8220;why should I waste my time calling or meeting when I can just text?&#8221; The end result is that in many cases these people fall behind, or at least trail others that have developed good interpersonal social skills. And the funniest part is that they have no idea why their lack of social skills might inhibit their professional career tracks. They don&#8217;t understand the value of relationships in business, and that relationships are bonded in personal interaction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave it up to the researchers to determine the long-term effects of brain development / concentration / etc. but I&#8217;m with you on the issue of real relationships. Technology is great and it has many, many benefits in both personal and professional life. But let&#8217;s not forget about the need for and benefits of the development of solid social skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68323</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68323</guid>
		<description>Once again the Daily Mail is attempting to find fodder for its anti-internet campaign (strange for an organisation with a large online presence...ho hum). However, Baroness Greenfield is mistaken in her theoretical assumptions. Once again we see a well known scientists basing their theories on assumption, rather than fact and evidence. Not only does that do harm to parents who will worry about their children&#039;s brains, but it does harm to the reputation of science - something for which Baroness Greenfield has previously done so much good. The evidence, such that we have, suggests the reverse of the fears. It suggests that children&#039;s brains are being improved, not harmed, by modern technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again the Daily Mail is attempting to find fodder for its anti-internet campaign (strange for an organisation with a large online presence&#8230;ho hum). However, Baroness Greenfield is mistaken in her theoretical assumptions. Once again we see a well known scientists basing their theories on assumption, rather than fact and evidence. Not only does that do harm to parents who will worry about their children&#8217;s brains, but it does harm to the reputation of science &#8211; something for which Baroness Greenfield has previously done so much good. The evidence, such that we have, suggests the reverse of the fears. It suggests that children&#8217;s brains are being improved, not harmed, by modern technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68322</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68322</guid>
		<description>Anyone that compares social media, to &quot;killing, skinning and butchering an animal&quot; has an obvious agenda that isn&#039;t based on objective scientific research. Pointing to shorter attention spans and young people being more self centered doesn&#039;t present any realistic scientific findings. Show me were the neural pathways are migrating and then we can have a chat, until then it just sounds like a bunch of academic hogwash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that compares social media, to &#8220;killing, skinning and butchering an animal&#8221; has an obvious agenda that isn&#8217;t based on objective scientific research. Pointing to shorter attention spans and young people being more self centered doesn&#8217;t present any realistic scientific findings. Show me were the neural pathways are migrating and then we can have a chat, until then it just sounds like a bunch of academic hogwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Catsimanes</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/02/social-media-changes-brains.html/comment-page-1#comment-68321</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Catsimanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8400#comment-68321</guid>
		<description>What was the questions again?

&lt;em&gt;Andy Catsimanes&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheMichelFortinBlog/~3/xaSnsb-PpCE/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Economic Crisis Killing Your Dreams?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the questions again?</p>
<p><em>Andy Catsimanes&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheMichelFortinBlog/~3/xaSnsb-PpCE/' rel="nofollow">Economic Crisis Killing Your Dreams?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
