Posted March 5, 2009 7:53 pm by with 9 comments

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on FacebookBuffer this page

geometry_2At Econsultancy today, Editor-in-chief Chris Lake is putting social media measurement into perspective:

The key with social media measurement, I think, is to stand back and take a widescreen approach to measurement.

Rather than focusing on the smaller, campaign-specific metrics, such as traffic from Twitter or the number of fans on Facebook, wouldn’t it be better to look at how it helps to shift the most important business KPIs, such as sales, profits, as well as customer retention and satisfaction rates?

Wait, what? Instead of looking at the easily measurable metrics, actually measure our success by how well our social media stats fit into our overall online strategy? . . . Nah, that’ll never work.

Okay, it shouldn’t be any secret that I totally agree with Chris here, since I’ve been talking about this since my very first post on Marketing Pilgrim. Sometimes, guys, we do get a little too fixated on the trees.

Three or four years ago, that meant obsessively following your ranking stats for each keyword, rather than looking at how well that traffic did once they actually got to our sites. These days, it’s more at exactly what Chris mentions above. Frankly, ten thousand followers on Facebook or Twitter doesn’t mean a whole lot if it’s not actually helping your business.

(Granted, you would have to be doing it wrong if social media’s not helping your business, but if you’re not even looking at that side of the equation, it’s going to be pretty hard to do it right, yes?)

But the benefits of social media aren’t all directly measurable, as Chris also accurately points out. Your 10,000 Facebook fans might not be making you much money because they never seem to click through your page to your site, but your little badge is (buried deep) on each of those fans’ profiles. Can we say brand lift?

And as if that weren’t enough good advice, Chris goes on to outline ten steps to accurately measuring your social media campaigns’ impact. But first (well, zeroth, I guess) he reminds us to set our benchmarks. We have to take stock of where we are to know where we can go, and to see if we’re making any progress in getting there, right?

Chris’s ten steps start with the most obvious: traffic. Okay, yes, traffic can be a big benefit from social media campaigns. But sometimes we tend to stop there. Twitter increases site traffic 20% and we’re satisfied.

But for real social media success, we can’t stop there. We have to continue on to measure other potential benefits of social media to make sure that we’re really running an effective social campaign. Chris includes (positive) interactions, customer engagement, leads, branding benefits, search, PR, and, of course, sales, customer retention and profits.

Now, if you had to choose between measuring how many people MySpace is driving to your site or examining the overall business benefits of social media, the choice should be easy. What do you like to measure? What kind of success have you found this way?

  • Andy Beal

    I need someone to come up with a way of measuring all of the different measurements I could be measuring and help me measure which are worth measuring. :-)

    In other words, just because I can track the number of people from Agentina that visit my product page via Twitter, should I?

  • Sue Burton

    Cost Per Action (CPA) marketing is one of the best online campaign strategies for cost-effectively generating leads (and clients) with zero advertising waste. In a marketing/Web 2.0 mashup where everyone is trying to figure out how to “make Social Media pay?” — the real question is what is the BEST, most precise tactic for online lead generation/customer acquisition.

  • C. Schmidt

    What I think is interesting about this is that news sources are comparing twitter to google and not facebook. They are looking at it as more of a news source.

  • Jared D.

    There is also a really interesting line of thought that trys to tie social media conversion rates (followers to consumers, consumers to buyers) to customer lifetime value.

    I am heading a group of MBAs at Vanderbilt who are going down that path – we’re currently evaluating the types of metrics based on their relavence to being tied to customer lifetime value. We’re under no illusions that we are going to come up with a majic formula. We ARE doing a pretty decent job filtering through Andy’s point of which metrics are relavent and which aren’t.

  • regalos originales

    I think you can make bad reputation if you abuse of social bookmarking. Its important the quality of the inbound links you get

  • Pingback: Understanding Social Media Metrics: Basic Modeling - Left The Box()

  • Pingback: Измерима ли е социалната ангажираност във Facebook и Twitter?()

  • Pingback: 5. Metrics and reporting – the backbone of understanding your community | Social media agency | FreshNetworks London()

  • Pingback: Social Engagement: Is it a Real Metric? [INFOGRAPHIC] | Social Media and Social Good()