<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking Up 93% Since 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your SEM News for the Week of March 10, 2009 &#124; SageRock Digital Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-69307</link>
		<dc:creator>Your SEM News for the Week of March 10, 2009 &#124; SageRock Digital Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-69307</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Networking Up 93% Since 2006 one interesting statistic is that 54% of micro-bloggers post or “tweet” daily. Also 74% of the daily micro-bloggers are under the age of 18. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Networking Up 93% Since 2006 one interesting statistic is that 54% of micro-bloggers post or “tweet” daily. Also 74% of the daily micro-bloggers are under the age of 18. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-69008</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-69008</guid>
		<description>&gt; social network = &lt; real social life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; social network = &lt; real social life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Strategist</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68900</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68900</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the respondents mean they&#039;re spending more time online communicating and less time being passively entertained? Thanks for the market research. It is some of the most valuable of all content and also the least easy to locate. I also noted your contest and will be adding it to my most recent post on giveaways.

&lt;em&gt;Internet Strategist&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gmprss/~3/FLUUqilcDmg/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why You Should Enter These Contests and Giveaways - Send Us YOUR Contest NOW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the respondents mean they&#8217;re spending more time online communicating and less time being passively entertained? Thanks for the market research. It is some of the most valuable of all content and also the least easy to locate. I also noted your contest and will be adding it to my most recent post on giveaways.</p>
<p><em>Internet Strategist&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gmprss/~3/FLUUqilcDmg/' rel="nofollow">Why You Should Enter These Contests and Giveaways &#8211; Send Us YOUR Contest NOW</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wineconversation.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Excuse me while I go exploring</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68883</link>
		<dc:creator>wineconversation.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Excuse me while I go exploring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68883</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Networking Up 93% Since 2006 (marketingpilgrim.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Networking Up 93% Since 2006 (marketingpilgrim.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68852</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68852</guid>
		<description>The verdict is, Social Networking is still at hatchling stages. It&#039;s still growing strong. ;-)

&lt;em&gt;Darren Tan&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.indiesurf.com/friendly-fires/music-review-friendly-fires-by-friendly-fires/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Music Review: ?Friendly Fires? by Friendly Fires&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The verdict is, Social Networking is still at hatchling stages. It&#8217;s still growing strong. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><em>Darren Tan&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.indiesurf.com/friendly-fires/music-review-friendly-fires-by-friendly-fires/' rel="nofollow">Music Review: ?Friendly Fires? by Friendly Fires</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBC &#187; Social Media FTW</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68827</link>
		<dc:creator>TBC &#187; Social Media FTW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68827</guid>
		<description>[...] According to a recently released study, social media has been going through the stage of exceptional growth for the last three years. The number of users of social media websites has reached 105 million. More details and stat data for those who interested are here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to a recently released study, social media has been going through the stage of exceptional growth for the last three years. The number of users of social media websites has reached 105 million. More details and stat data for those who interested are here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68794</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68794</guid>
		<description>@Andy  Exactly--we are arguing that even though people may be watching online videos more, maybe watching TV less, they feel that -- of the total time they spend online -- they are spending more of that time communicating (talking) and less of it being entertained.  How much of the time are people on YouTube spending watching the videos versus reading what people have to say about them? We might include that question next time and think it&#039;s a fair question to ask.

&lt;em&gt;Rudy&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.netpopresearch.com/node/26574&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The percent of time people spend communicating online has increased 18 percent&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy  Exactly&#8211;we are arguing that even though people may be watching online videos more, maybe watching TV less, they feel that &#8212; of the total time they spend online &#8212; they are spending more of that time communicating (talking) and less of it being entertained.  How much of the time are people on YouTube spending watching the videos versus reading what people have to say about them? We might include that question next time and think it&#8217;s a fair question to ask.</p>
<p><em>Rudy&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.netpopresearch.com/node/26574' rel="nofollow">The percent of time people spend communicating online has increased 18 percent</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68793</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68793</guid>
		<description>@Rudy but as long as you&#039;re measuring the same &quot;perceived&quot; value as you did in 2006, then the decline is accurate, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rudy but as long as you&#8217;re measuring the same &#8220;perceived&#8221; value as you did in 2006, then the decline is accurate, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68790</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68790</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rudy for stopping by and adding that to the conversation. I can see now how some might perceive a decrease in entertainment as they move off of older forms of online entertainment such as flash games and on to video consumption, which despite the fact is new, could still be regarded as old to many users given that the format and content has changed little from the transition from TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rudy for stopping by and adding that to the conversation. I can see now how some might perceive a decrease in entertainment as they move off of older forms of online entertainment such as flash games and on to video consumption, which despite the fact is new, could still be regarded as old to many users given that the format and content has changed little from the transition from TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68789</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68789</guid>
		<description>Great post on our findings, Joe--I really appreciate it!

To clarify a bit on the decline in entertainment. Since the data is self reported, this finding shows that people *perceive* that their entertainment consumption online is going down relative to communication, information, etc.  Consumption of entertainment channels certainly seem to be rising on the whole, but broadband users think that they spend much more time communicating.

Hope that makes things more clear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post on our findings, Joe&#8211;I really appreciate it!</p>
<p>To clarify a bit on the decline in entertainment. Since the data is self reported, this finding shows that people *perceive* that their entertainment consumption online is going down relative to communication, information, etc.  Consumption of entertainment channels certainly seem to be rising on the whole, but broadband users think that they spend much more time communicating.</p>
<p>Hope that makes things more clear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68788</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68788</guid>
		<description>@lyad - Clarification: thats 74% of the &lt;b&gt;54% that tweet daily&lt;/b&gt;. So that&#039;s around 40% of the whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@lyad &#8211; Clarification: thats 74% of the <b>54% that tweet daily</b>. So that&#8217;s around 40% of the whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iyad</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/03/social-networking-up-93-since-2006.html/comment-page-1#comment-68786</link>
		<dc:creator>Iyad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=8690#comment-68786</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also 74% of the daily micro-bloggers are under the age of 18.&quot; Is this true??

&lt;em&gt;Iyad&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://iyadb.com/2009/03/03/the-daily-show-my-stalker-just-grunted-on-my-twitter/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Daily Show:  “My Stalker Just Grunted On My Twitter”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also 74% of the daily micro-bloggers are under the age of 18.&#8221; Is this true??</p>
<p><em>Iyad&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://iyadb.com/2009/03/03/the-daily-show-my-stalker-just-grunted-on-my-twitter/' rel="nofollow">The Daily Show:  “My Stalker Just Grunted On My Twitter”</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

