<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:40:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Lazerus</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Lazerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72964</guid>
		<description>It really doesn&#039;t make sense to me for a few of reasons. One, Apple makes computers, iPod, iPhone, the OS, iTunes, and software the generally runs on the Mac and variants. How in the world does Twitter fit in that? Unless it is as Mark Sigal said, some sort of MobileMe direction. 

Two, the first Twitter commercial endeavor was with Microsoft. Hello! 

Third, Apple is not generally known for acquiring other companies. RARELY have they even partnered, unlike that promiscuous Microsoft. Twitter has a lot of users... but it hasn&#039;t really proven it can keep them. 

Maybe Apple started this rumor as a shill to get the price up and weaken their competition by depleting their cash. Maybe I saw Bigfoot in my backyard yesterday. I can invent any rumor if I don&#039;t have to come up with evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really doesn&#8217;t make sense to me for a few of reasons. One, Apple makes computers, iPod, iPhone, the OS, iTunes, and software the generally runs on the Mac and variants. How in the world does Twitter fit in that? Unless it is as Mark Sigal said, some sort of MobileMe direction. </p>
<p>Two, the first Twitter commercial endeavor was with Microsoft. Hello! </p>
<p>Third, Apple is not generally known for acquiring other companies. RARELY have they even partnered, unlike that promiscuous Microsoft. Twitter has a lot of users&#8230; but it hasn&#8217;t really proven it can keep them. </p>
<p>Maybe Apple started this rumor as a shill to get the price up and weaken their competition by depleting their cash. Maybe I saw Bigfoot in my backyard yesterday. I can invent any rumor if I don&#8217;t have to come up with evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Specifics of sales marketing &#124; Custom Pillows For Personalized Decorative Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72962</link>
		<dc:creator>Specifics of sales marketing &#124; Custom Pillows For Personalized Decorative Experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72962</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fit Jerk</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72946</link>
		<dc:creator>Fit Jerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72946</guid>
		<description>Twittertosh?

Whatever, 700mil should be enough for Apple to step in and B-Slap Twitter into removing the lame follow limits. If twitter keeps this up, expect some other service (friendfeed, jaiku or tumblr) to become top daddy of micro-blogging.

&lt;em&gt;Fit Jerk&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://flawlessfitnessbook.com/blog/building-muscle-mass-by-eating-more-carbs-why-gluconeogenesis-is-your-enemy/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Building Muscle Mass By Eating More? Carbs? Why Gluconeogenesis Is Your Enemy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twittertosh?</p>
<p>Whatever, 700mil should be enough for Apple to step in and B-Slap Twitter into removing the lame follow limits. If twitter keeps this up, expect some other service (friendfeed, jaiku or tumblr) to become top daddy of micro-blogging.</p>
<p><em>Fit Jerk&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://flawlessfitnessbook.com/blog/building-muscle-mass-by-eating-more-carbs-why-gluconeogenesis-is-your-enemy/' rel="nofollow">Building Muscle Mass By Eating More? Carbs? Why Gluconeogenesis Is Your Enemy</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Apple Info&#187; Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of… &#124; Twitter Apple Info</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72935</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Apple Info&#187; Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of… &#124; Twitter Apple Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72935</guid>
		<description>[...] post: Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of…   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Apple in Talks with Twitter! Well, Sort of…   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sigal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72932</guid>
		<description>While I am skeptical that Apple would make a deal like this, and it’s always silly to comment on (rumored) price tags on pre-revenue companies, I will say this; there is a logical scenario for Apple to acquire Twitter.  

First off, the status update message has emerged as the ultimate social gesture, and we all know how Apple is all about driving consumer engagement.  

Quantitatively speaking, it is something that Facebookers, MySpacers, tweeters, LinkedIn users do 1-10 times a day (whether they think of the activity as status updating or not).  

Now, if you married the simple atomicity of the update message with the ability of the messaging client to process “payloads” like pictures, videos, songs, contacts, locative data, documents, URLs, etc., you have a recipe to turn Apple&#039;s MobileMe service into its original moniker of “Exchange for the Rest of Us,” all the while having a core messaging infrastructure that is lightweight and portable enough to run on desktops, iPods, mobile devices and TVs.

Here’s a post that I wrote, which provides a straw man analysis of what such an infrastructure might look like:

&quot;Right Here Now&quot; services: weaving a real-time web around status
 http://bit.ly/i40h

Check it out if interested.

Cheers,

Mark
--
follow me via twitter @netgarden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am skeptical that Apple would make a deal like this, and it’s always silly to comment on (rumored) price tags on pre-revenue companies, I will say this; there is a logical scenario for Apple to acquire Twitter.  </p>
<p>First off, the status update message has emerged as the ultimate social gesture, and we all know how Apple is all about driving consumer engagement.  </p>
<p>Quantitatively speaking, it is something that Facebookers, MySpacers, tweeters, LinkedIn users do 1-10 times a day (whether they think of the activity as status updating or not).  </p>
<p>Now, if you married the simple atomicity of the update message with the ability of the messaging client to process “payloads” like pictures, videos, songs, contacts, locative data, documents, URLs, etc., you have a recipe to turn Apple&#8217;s MobileMe service into its original moniker of “Exchange for the Rest of Us,” all the while having a core messaging infrastructure that is lightweight and portable enough to run on desktops, iPods, mobile devices and TVs.</p>
<p>Here’s a post that I wrote, which provides a straw man analysis of what such an infrastructure might look like:</p>
<p>&#8220;Right Here Now&#8221; services: weaving a real-time web around status<br />
 <a href="http://bit.ly/i40h" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/i40h</a></p>
<p>Check it out if interested.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mark<br />
&#8211;<br />
follow me via twitter @netgarden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Morejon</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72916</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Morejon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72916</guid>
		<description>This could be a good fit for Apple - 700 mil does sound cheap.

&lt;em&gt;Roy Morejon&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://roymorejon.com/run-a-twitter-contest-with-tweetswin-socail-mediasoftware/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Run a Twitter Contest with TweetsWin Social Media Software&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a good fit for Apple &#8211; 700 mil does sound cheap.</p>
<p><em>Roy Morejon&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://roymorejon.com/run-a-twitter-contest-with-tweetswin-socail-mediasoftware/' rel="nofollow">Run a Twitter Contest with TweetsWin Social Media Software</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/05/apple-in-talsk-with-twitter-well-sort-of.html/comment-page-1#comment-72913</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10020#comment-72913</guid>
		<description>700 mil seems kind of cheap for twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>700 mil seems kind of cheap for twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
