<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Showing as a Source in Google News Stories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/wikipedia-showing-as-a-source-in-google-news-stories.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/wikipedia-showing-as-a-source-in-google-news-stories.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ. www.classadsuk.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/wikipedia-showing-as-a-source-in-google-news-stories.html/comment-page-1#comment-77722</link>
		<dc:creator>russ. www.classadsuk.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10880#comment-77722</guid>
		<description>a big thumbs up to wikipedia i think google will carry on i think it will stay also i think it will be intergrated into rather than replace google news and that would be spectacular</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a big thumbs up to wikipedia i think google will carry on i think it will stay also i think it will be intergrated into rather than replace google news and that would be spectacular</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Platt</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/wikipedia-showing-as-a-source-in-google-news-stories.html/comment-page-1#comment-75740</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Platt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10880#comment-75740</guid>
		<description>Bizarre. The world knows that Wikipedia is a source for good starting info, but not for factual details. We know that we should never trust Wiki for its accuracy, yet the Google engineers think it is solid enough to trust for their search results? 

I would call that a chink in Google&#039;s armor, for anyone who wants to compete against Google in the search environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bizarre. The world knows that Wikipedia is a source for good starting info, but not for factual details. We know that we should never trust Wiki for its accuracy, yet the Google engineers think it is solid enough to trust for their search results? </p>
<p>I would call that a chink in Google&#8217;s armor, for anyone who wants to compete against Google in the search environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Or Hillel</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/wikipedia-showing-as-a-source-in-google-news-stories.html/comment-page-1#comment-75577</link>
		<dc:creator>Or Hillel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=10880#comment-75577</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad news for all the SEO&#039;s, Alot of us getting traffic from google news so now wikipedia will be there is somthing that will affect the ranking at google news and affect the traffic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad news for all the SEO&#8217;s, Alot of us getting traffic from google news so now wikipedia will be there is somthing that will affect the ranking at google news and affect the traffic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

