<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Deliberately Sabotaging Bing&#8217;s Search Listing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup Batra</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-79227</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup Batra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-79227</guid>
		<description>I am most certain Google is not sabotaging any thing. I have seen this for many other sites...Google usually takes a longer time to re-index because of the gargantuan size of the index. Bing re-indexes faster which is something Google may have to work on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am most certain Google is not sabotaging any thing. I have seen this for many other sites&#8230;Google usually takes a longer time to re-index because of the gargantuan size of the index. Bing re-indexes faster which is something Google may have to work on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78609</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78609</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you can blame Google for not changing every mention of Live.com to Bing as soon as Microsoft decided to rebrand.  They have changed the name of their search engine as often as some people change hair colors. I think if you removed the search industry from the results of a man on the street quiz, most would have no idea they ever changed the name to live.com, much less bing.com

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Formula For Success&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you can blame Google for not changing every mention of Live.com to Bing as soon as Microsoft decided to rebrand.  They have changed the name of their search engine as often as some people change hair colors. I think if you removed the search industry from the results of a man on the street quiz, most would have no idea they ever changed the name to live.com, much less bing.com</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html' rel="nofollow">Formula For Success</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78510</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78510</guid>
		<description>I doubt google is doing this, they  make so much money there not interested in this balogni</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt google is doing this, they  make so much money there not interested in this balogni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78472</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78472</guid>
		<description>What is interesting to me is that Microsoft pays millions in advertising and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.resoluted.com/search_engine_marketing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paid Search&lt;/a&gt; Campaigns to get screwed with by Google&#039;s indexing engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is interesting to me is that Microsoft pays millions in advertising and <a href="http://www.resoluted.com/search_engine_marketing/" rel="nofollow">Paid Search</a> Campaigns to get screwed with by Google&#8217;s indexing engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google isn't pinging Bing or ARE THEY?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78435</link>
		<dc:creator>Google isn't pinging Bing or ARE THEY?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78435</guid>
		<description>We all love Google but at the end of the day the are a business with they own interests to protect . . . that being said . . . . I think Google make have indexed the page automatically but left it that where untill somebody noticed AUTOMAGICALLY . . . lol . .. . has anyone noticed the new  GOOGLE TRY YOUR SEARCH ELSEWHERE????

They are still referring to BING as LIVE - you wouldn&#039;t even notice it if you were not looking for it 

&quot;Try your search on Yahoo, Ask, AllTheWeb, Live, Lycos, Technorati, Wikipedia, Bloglines, Altavista, A9, GoodSearch&quot;

&lt;em&gt;Google isn&#039;t pinging Bing or ARE THEY?&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://ebanza.com/blog/2009/07/mcnairs-girlfriend-killed-former-nfler-before-shooting-self-police/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;McNair&#039;s girlfriend killed former NFLer before shooting self: police&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all love Google but at the end of the day the are a business with they own interests to protect . . . that being said . . . . I think Google make have indexed the page automatically but left it that where untill somebody noticed AUTOMAGICALLY . . . lol . .. . has anyone noticed the new  GOOGLE TRY YOUR SEARCH ELSEWHERE????</p>
<p>They are still referring to BING as LIVE &#8211; you wouldn&#8217;t even notice it if you were not looking for it </p>
<p>&#8220;Try your search on Yahoo, Ask, AllTheWeb, Live, Lycos, Technorati, Wikipedia, Bloglines, Altavista, A9, GoodSearch&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Google isn&#8217;t pinging Bing or ARE THEY?&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://ebanza.com/blog/2009/07/mcnairs-girlfriend-killed-former-nfler-before-shooting-self-police/' rel="nofollow">McNair&#8217;s girlfriend killed former NFLer before shooting self: police</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78397</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78397</guid>
		<description>Top 10, I mean to say, but still sorry none the less.

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Formula For Success&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 10, I mean to say, but still sorry none the less.</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html' rel="nofollow">Formula For Success</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78396</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78396</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they should be paying more attention to their own SERPs, the continuing tragedy that is the results for &quot;search engine&quot; in Bing is just pathetic.  Dogpile, AltaVista, WebCrawler, AllTheWeb and 2 (count them 2) results from Wikipedia are in the top 5?  I surprised HotBot, Lycos and Inktomi didn&#039;t make the list.

&lt;em&gt;Terry Howard&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Formula For Success&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they should be paying more attention to their own SERPs, the continuing tragedy that is the results for &#8220;search engine&#8221; in Bing is just pathetic.  Dogpile, AltaVista, WebCrawler, AllTheWeb and 2 (count them 2) results from Wikipedia are in the top 5?  I surprised HotBot, Lycos and Inktomi didn&#8217;t make the list.</p>
<p><em>Terry Howard&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.terryhoward.net/2009/06/formula-for-success.html' rel="nofollow">Formula For Success</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78342</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78342</guid>
		<description>To answer the question in the headline: no we definitely weren&#039;t deliberately sabotaging Bing&#039;s search listing. I see ~140K pages indexed for [site:bing.com/travel], so it&#039;s not a surprise that some pages got indexed while Bing was down. It&#039;s definitely in the normal range to take a few days for Google to recrawl a page.

&lt;em&gt;Matt Cutts&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.mattcutts.com/~r/mattcutts/uJBW/~3/0uvdnIk7NIY/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Making a John Q Public account on Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer the question in the headline: no we definitely weren&#8217;t deliberately sabotaging Bing&#8217;s search listing. I see ~140K pages indexed for [site:bing.com/travel], so it&#8217;s not a surprise that some pages got indexed while Bing was down. It&#8217;s definitely in the normal range to take a few days for Google to recrawl a page.</p>
<p><em>Matt Cutts&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.mattcutts.com/~r/mattcutts/uJBW/~3/0uvdnIk7NIY/' rel="nofollow">Making a John Q Public account on Google</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing Cries Out Loud at Google</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html/comment-page-1#comment-78252</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing Cries Out Loud at Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/is-google-deliberately-sabotaging-bings-search-listing.html#comment-78252</guid>
		<description>[...] after 6 hours or so, I noticed that Andy Beal is covering the story in Marketing Pilgrim. So I became a bit curious and tried the search again this time only with the key phrase [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] after 6 hours or so, I noticed that Andy Beal is covering the story in Marketing Pilgrim. So I became a bit curious and tried the search again this time only with the key phrase [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

