Comments on: No, Google Didn’t Lose Searches to Yahoo. Check the Math… http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html Internet Marketing News Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: hair transplant http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81263 hair transplant Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:12:51 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81263 No, google didn't lose searches to yahoo. Simple math: google search on june 6.611.079, google search on july 6.809.116. There is an increase of 198,037 No, google didn’t lose searches to yahoo.
Simple math: google search on june 6.611.079, google search on july 6.809.116.
There is an increase of 198,037

]]> By: aery http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81262 aery Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:22:10 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81262 Once the broadband becomes universal, Google will be dominating the world. just wait, Google will swipe all the search companies. .-= aery´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gtricksrss/~3/2nwv0y92tBM/" rel="nofollow">Simple Trick to Remove Advertisements or Sponsored Links from Gmail</a> =-. Once the broadband becomes universal, Google will be dominating the world.

just wait, Google will swipe all the search companies.
.-= aery´s last blog ..Simple Trick to Remove Advertisements or Sponsored Links from Gmail =-.

]]> By: Rajj http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81232 Rajj Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:37:39 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81232 One day it has to happen, we all knew. Yahoo gonna pickup.... Well but still Google will be my best search engine... One day it has to happen, we all knew. Yahoo gonna pickup…. Well but still Google will be my best search engine…

]]> By: 看仔细，Google 并未被 Yahoo 抢走用户哦 « 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81221 看仔细，Google 并未被 Yahoo 抢走用户哦 « 每日IT新闻，最新IT资讯，聚合多站点消息，保证你与世界同步 Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:00:31 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81221 [...] Via Marketing Plgrim [...] [...] Via Marketing Plgrim [...]

]]> By: Free Wii http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81220 Free Wii Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:38:22 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81220 I don't think google will be too concerned, they are still really dominant and they are working on improving google from what i've seen lately! I don’t think google will be too concerned, they are still really dominant and they are working on improving google from what i’ve seen lately!

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81211 Michael Martinez Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:31:18 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81211 It's bogus data anyway, following an obsolete metric that is only relevant to people who want to purchase run-of-network advertising on the search services. It’s bogus data anyway, following an obsolete metric that is only relevant to people who want to purchase run-of-network advertising on the search services.

]]> By: 看仔细，Google 并未被 Yahoo 抢走用户哦 | 谷奥——探寻谷歌的奥秘 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81194 看仔细，Google 并未被 Yahoo 抢走用户哦 | 谷奥——探寻谷歌的奥秘 Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:32:30 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81194 [...] Marketing Plgrim 本站文章除注明转载外，均为本站原创编译 [...] [...] Marketing Plgrim 本站文章除注明转载外，均为本站原创编译 [...]

]]> By: Andy Beal http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81190 Andy Beal Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:17:01 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81190 @Alysson - nicely said! :-) @Alysson – nicely said! :-)

]]> By: Alysson http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html/comment-page-1#comment-81189 Alysson Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:14:24 +0000 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/no-google-didnt-lose-searches-to-yahoo-check-the-math.html#comment-81189 The part of the article in reference to Google's search volume actually increasing overall really illustrates the way that statistics can be manipulated and misused to supposedly "prove" one side of an argument vs. another. Those who want to "prove" that Yahoo! is gaining steam use only the "Google's % of searches went down..." data, while the data as a whole doesn't support the contention that fewer searches were done using Google - which is what those making the argument would want you to believe. It emphasizes the importance of using numbers and statistics as puzzle pieces and only once those pieces are fit together properly can we really see the whole picture. Otherwise we're just falling victim to an intellectual illusion similar to the magic tricks performed by street magicians in Vegas. Never forget that what they don't want you to see would ruin the illusion. .-= Alysson´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.seoaly.com/website-audit-for-your-needs/" rel="nofollow">Choosing The Website Audit That Is Best For YOUR Needs</a> =-. The part of the article in reference to Google’s search volume actually increasing overall really illustrates the way that statistics can be manipulated and misused to supposedly “prove” one side of an argument vs. another. Those who want to “prove” that Yahoo! is gaining steam use only the “Google’s % of searches went down…” data, while the data as a whole doesn’t support the contention that fewer searches were done using Google – which is what those making the argument would want you to believe.

It emphasizes the importance of using numbers and statistics as puzzle pieces and only once those pieces are fit together properly can we really see the whole picture. Otherwise we’re just falling victim to an intellectual illusion similar to the magic tricks performed by street magicians in Vegas. Never forget that what they don’t want you to see would ruin the illusion.
.-= Alysson´s last blog ..Choosing The Website Audit That Is Best For YOUR Needs =-.

]]>