Twitter Keeps Growing


While a lot of the talk around Twitter is hype and hyperbole and anything else that is based in theory there are some real numbers that Twitter can point to that are hard to ignore. In June, according to comScore as reported by TechCrunch Twitter had 44.5 million visitors to the site. This is a pretty large number on its own, placing it ahead of ESPN and just shy of Craig’s List as well as the BBC’s site. In a pure ranking sense the site now sits at the 52nd largest site in the world. The graph below represents the kind of ‘hockey stick’ growth that most just dream will happen.

twitter-june-2009-chart 2

These numbers represent visitors not accounts so the number of Twitter users and the number of active accounts are not part of these results. What they do represent however is an increase of 7 million visitors from May to June of this year which is pretty strong. Amazing what a little political mayhem in Iran can do to goose the business fortunes of Internet entrepreneurs in the US.

Twitter must be happy with these numbers for sure, especially the fact that there was a remarkable 1,460% increase in visitors from June of 2008 to June of 2009. So how could this be better? Well, about 20 million of the total 44.5 million visitors are from the US, which means that the international appeal of the service is very strong. The best piece though is that it is estimated that only about ½ of the total Twitter user population actually visit the site. The heaviest users in fact are using a variety of third party apps like TweetDeck to manage their Twitter experience.

So you can talk about all the psychology and community and whatever other ‘ology’ there is about Twitter but at the bottom of all of it are large numbers of visitors and users. These are the things that companies spend money on. You know, pesky numbers and cold hard facts. Now if only Twitter would try to make a little money from all of this ‘success’. It’s getting to the point now that this needs to be the next news coming from the little bird, don’t you think?


  • http://thetrainingworld.com/wp/ Robert Bacal

    Sadly the more relevant numbers are not positive at all. The huge majority of accounts do not participate at all, there is no indication that even 15% of accounts read anything on a regular basis, and of the people signing up, a large percentage dislike it enough not to come back and use their accounts.

    That’s BAD metrics, and to pay ad dollars to twitter in this situation is insanity.

    There are more bad metrics, but I have to run but there is more indepth treatment in Twitter A deadend Investment For Small Business at

    http://smallbusiness411.org/wp/small-business-and-the-internet/twitter -a-dead-end-investment-for-small-business/

    or

    http://bit.ly/1ecqJA
    .-= Robert Bacal´s last blog ..Why Technology Never Has The Expected Positive Impact on Learning and Teaching =-.

  • http://www.crearecommunications.co.uk Luci

    Sure, Twitter has a lot of visitors, but I second what Robert Bacal said. I mean.. how many of those return time and time again and become reliable figures?

    I heard the other day that Twitter is for celebrities, and then everybody else just reads it. I think that’s kind of true, anybody who’s somebody is on Twitter, any everybody else is just wallpaper.
    .-= Luci´s last blog ..Writing SEO Content In A Variety Of Forms =-.

  • Pingback: Twitter Bigger | Daily Rover

  • Pingback: Twitter: le Top 50 Bourse et Finance : Club Finance - Edito

  • Pingback: Les meilleurs utilisateurs Twitter du secteur financier | Sitebuzz

  • Pingback: Twitter policies making news « Chris Thilk