<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Beats Google&#8211;Is It Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/comment-page-1#comment-81864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=12402#comment-81864</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s why I said it probably wouldn&#039;t hurt you &quot;unless you’re an obsessive stock market gambler or a professional day trader.&quot;

And let&#039;s face it, if you need that extra millisecond, you&#039;re not using Yahoo or Google for your financial info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s why I said it probably wouldn&#8217;t hurt you &#8220;unless you’re an obsessive stock market gambler or a professional day trader.&#8221;</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s face it, if you need that extra millisecond, you&#8217;re not using Yahoo or Google for your financial info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Becktold</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/comment-page-1#comment-81862</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Becktold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=12402#comment-81862</guid>
		<description>Just to focus on your final question, is a one-minute delay worth the worry?  Depends on the audience a site hopes to attract.  Casual traders and individuals may be ok with delayed data, but for serious investors and traders, a one-minute delay is an eternity.  Algo-traders, which make up a huge portion of trading activity, are looking to shave milliseconds off time-lags in data and information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to focus on your final question, is a one-minute delay worth the worry?  Depends on the audience a site hopes to attract.  Casual traders and individuals may be ok with delayed data, but for serious investors and traders, a one-minute delay is an eternity.  Algo-traders, which make up a huge portion of trading activity, are looking to shave milliseconds off time-lags in data and information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Udi</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/comment-page-1#comment-81833</link>
		<dc:creator>Udi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=12402#comment-81833</guid>
		<description>Odd, I usually prefer Yahoo products as they are superior to Google&#039;s. However, in this particular case I think Google Finance is simply better - it offers so much more, even if it&#039;s slightly harder to use (and it is). I guess my taste differs from that of the NYT!
.-= Udi´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.industryreview.org/social-media/the-professional-and-personal-hazards-that-twitter-carries&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Professional and Personal Hazards that Twitter Carries&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd, I usually prefer Yahoo products as they are superior to Google&#8217;s. However, in this particular case I think Google Finance is simply better &#8211; it offers so much more, even if it&#8217;s slightly harder to use (and it is). I guess my taste differs from that of the NYT!<br />
.-= Udi´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.industryreview.org/social-media/the-professional-and-personal-hazards-that-twitter-carries" rel="nofollow">The Professional and Personal Hazards that Twitter Carries</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/comment-page-1#comment-81792</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=12402#comment-81792</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m not sure I buy the &quot;fear of data.&quot; I was about to put  screencaps of stock profile pages in this post&#8212;but Yahoo&#039;s didn&#039;t look &quot;cleaner,&quot; like the NYT seemed to think. To me, Google&#039;s looked slightly less cluttered, but didn&#039;t work on some level for me. I think your analogy is apt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not sure I buy the &#8220;fear of data.&#8221; I was about to put  screencaps of stock profile pages in this post&mdash;but Yahoo&#8217;s didn&#8217;t look &#8220;cleaner,&#8221; like the NYT seemed to think. To me, Google&#8217;s looked slightly less cluttered, but didn&#8217;t work on some level for me. I think your analogy is apt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/08/yahoo-beats-google-is-it-enough.html/comment-page-1#comment-81790</link>
		<dc:creator>Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=12402#comment-81790</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s surprising is that Google shoves their own finance content into the top of the SERPs. Search for, e.g. KO, and you&#039;re going to see a chart, a quote, and some extra market data. (The first organic result is from Y!Finance.)

Google Finance does look really good, and the tools they have function quite well. But they&#039;re feature-phobic and they hate clutter. Most people who care about finance still remember scanning stock tables in the paper; they expect to be bombarded with columns of numbers when they read about stocks. Google&#039;s design is clean, but it&#039;s the unnerving kind of &quot;clean&quot; you get when you go to the grocery store and the shelves are bare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s surprising is that Google shoves their own finance content into the top of the SERPs. Search for, e.g. KO, and you&#8217;re going to see a chart, a quote, and some extra market data. (The first organic result is from Y!Finance.)</p>
<p>Google Finance does look really good, and the tools they have function quite well. But they&#8217;re feature-phobic and they hate clutter. Most people who care about finance still remember scanning stock tables in the paper; they expect to be bombarded with columns of numbers when they read about stocks. Google&#8217;s design is clean, but it&#8217;s the unnerving kind of &#8220;clean&#8221; you get when you go to the grocery store and the shelves are bare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

