<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Fast Flip Shows the Newspaper Industry How It&#8217;s Done!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Bakhash</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83627</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Bakhash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83627</guid>
		<description>You may also like to check out SpaceTime3D at www.spacetime.com.

SpaceTime3D allows you to search Google web pages, Flickr images, Wikipedia and more using a stunning visual interface that speeds up the search process by allowing you to flip through pages presented in a visual stack of search results.

I hope you give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may also like to check out SpaceTime3D at www.spacetime.com.</p>
<p>SpaceTime3D allows you to search Google web pages, Flickr images, Wikipedia and more using a stunning visual interface that speeds up the search process by allowing you to flip through pages presented in a visual stack of search results.</p>
<p>I hope you give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media Commando</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83624</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Commando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83624</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newspapers and Google Embrace after Stormy, Emotional Battle...&lt;/strong&gt;

Er, not so fast.  &lt;em&gt;Fast Flip&lt;/em&gt; is a wonderful new product that enhances the consumer experience and throws a bone to the ailing newspaper industry.  But newspapers won&#039;t be satisfied with scraps, they&#039;re after the meat behind the Google revenue machine.

Not that I blame them.  What business really wants a competitor controlling their revenue stream and doling out profits as they see fit?  In reality Google is doing more than extending an olive branch, they invented a way to &lt;strong&gt;make more money for the papers.&lt;/strong&gt;  

My question...instead of building pay walls to lock up content that will be replicated by millions of other news sites and bloggers, why didn&#039;t newsies think of something like &lt;em&gt;Fast Flip&lt;/em&gt; themselves (and thus control ALL the revenue)?
.-= Social Media Commando´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.socialmediacommando.com/2009/09/16/online-reputation-management/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Online Reputation Management: Who’s Got Your Back?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newspapers and Google Embrace after Stormy, Emotional Battle&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Er, not so fast.  <em>Fast Flip</em> is a wonderful new product that enhances the consumer experience and throws a bone to the ailing newspaper industry.  But newspapers won&#8217;t be satisfied with scraps, they&#8217;re after the meat behind the Google revenue machine.</p>
<p>Not that I blame them.  What business really wants a competitor controlling their revenue stream and doling out profits as they see fit?  In reality Google is doing more than extending an olive branch, they invented a way to <strong>make more money for the papers.</strong>  </p>
<p>My question&#8230;instead of building pay walls to lock up content that will be replicated by millions of other news sites and bloggers, why didn&#8217;t newsies think of something like <em>Fast Flip</em> themselves (and thus control ALL the revenue)?<br />
.-= Social Media Commando´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.socialmediacommando.com/2009/09/16/online-reputation-management/" rel="nofollow">Online Reputation Management: Who’s Got Your Back?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83548</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83548</guid>
		<description>@andy  Don&#039;t I need to download Silverlight to get this to work? (tongue firmly planted in cheek)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@andy  Don&#8217;t I need to download Silverlight to get this to work? (tongue firmly planted in cheek)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BusinessRaid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83538</link>
		<dc:creator>BusinessRaid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83538</guid>
		<description>No matter what people try to do I just don&#039;t see the newspaper industry being able to stay afloat. Why would you read the newspapers when you can just go on their websites and read the news quickly from even an iphone or blackberry. Things change as technology advances and this is one of those things.
.-= BusinessRaid.com´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://businessraid.com/prosper-com-review&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prosper.com Review&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter what people try to do I just don&#8217;t see the newspaper industry being able to stay afloat. Why would you read the newspapers when you can just go on their websites and read the news quickly from even an iphone or blackberry. Things change as technology advances and this is one of those things.<br />
.-= BusinessRaid.com´s last blog ..<a href="http://businessraid.com/prosper-com-review" rel="nofollow">Prosper.com Review</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luci</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83528</link>
		<dc:creator>Luci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83528</guid>
		<description>I think i&#039;d probably read more news online if it all loaded faster, that&#039;s why i read papers when they&#039;re in front of me. I think it&#039;ll take off more on a &#039;mobile&#039; front though that&#039;s just my initial reaction.
.-= Luci´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/crearesearchengineoptimisationblog/~3/fC7GCKdDFzA/seo-vs-accessibility.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO vs Accessibility Video - Search Engine Optimisation Tutorial&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think i&#8217;d probably read more news online if it all loaded faster, that&#8217;s why i read papers when they&#8217;re in front of me. I think it&#8217;ll take off more on a &#8216;mobile&#8217; front though that&#8217;s just my initial reaction.<br />
.-= Luci´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/crearesearchengineoptimisationblog/~3/fC7GCKdDFzA/seo-vs-accessibility.html" rel="nofollow">SEO vs Accessibility Video &#8211; Search Engine Optimisation Tutorial</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara deBeer</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html/comment-page-1#comment-83527</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara deBeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-fast-flip-shows-the-newspaper-industry-how-its-done.html#comment-83527</guid>
		<description>Usually I ignore these kinds of pretty toys from Google, but I could actually see myself using this one. I tested results for &quot;caster semenya&quot;, &quot;yale murder&quot; and &quot;online backup&quot; and got great results for the first, limited results for the second, and no results for the third.

I think that at the moment the tool is more useful for trending/breaking news stories covered by the mainstream media (Google&#039;s top publishing partners) and not so much for anything older or harder to find. I would definitely expect them to expand their publisher list but I wonder if they&#039;ll extend the time window backwards or stay focused on the present? More revenue to be made from extending the results pool backwards, of course, since it will ensure that there are fewer/zero instances of no results and therefore there will always be an ad opportunity - but extending backwards might mean that the results are less relevant to readers who are looking for the latest on a story. 

Ain&#039;t speculation grand?
.-= Cara deBeer´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://slowtech.blogspot.com/2009/09/good-morning-vietnam.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Good Morning Vietnam&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually I ignore these kinds of pretty toys from Google, but I could actually see myself using this one. I tested results for &#8220;caster semenya&#8221;, &#8220;yale murder&#8221; and &#8220;online backup&#8221; and got great results for the first, limited results for the second, and no results for the third.</p>
<p>I think that at the moment the tool is more useful for trending/breaking news stories covered by the mainstream media (Google&#8217;s top publishing partners) and not so much for anything older or harder to find. I would definitely expect them to expand their publisher list but I wonder if they&#8217;ll extend the time window backwards or stay focused on the present? More revenue to be made from extending the results pool backwards, of course, since it will ensure that there are fewer/zero instances of no results and therefore there will always be an ad opportunity &#8211; but extending backwards might mean that the results are less relevant to readers who are looking for the latest on a story. </p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t speculation grand?<br />
.-= Cara deBeer´s last blog ..<a href="http://slowtech.blogspot.com/2009/09/good-morning-vietnam.html" rel="nofollow">Good Morning Vietnam</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

