Comments on: Google Now Lets You Strip Parameters from URLs

By: web graphic design

web graphic design — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:32:15 +0000

if search engine bots crawl the same page via multiple URLs, they may not have resources to crawl as many unique pages on the site PageRank dilution that can lead to lowered search rankings: if external sites link to multiple versions of a page, each page has less Page.

By: Bloggers Digest Resurrected: Ecommerce Links for September 2009 | Small Business Software|News, Reviews and Resources!

Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:24:49 +0000

[...] is a VERY important announcement regarding Google and search engine optimization: Google now lets you strip parameters from URLs. You now have a better weapon against duplicate content issues than the canonical URL [...]

By: Business Management

Business Management — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:46:32 +0000

This is new and nice feature of google. This new feature, whilst helpful with its additional insights into how Google sees you website, certainly doesn’t provide the best method of reducing or even completely eliminating duplicate content issues, unless perhaps you’re an SME. Also from Google’s perspective, by getting sites with duplicate content issues to at least reduce the amount of it, it will instantly free up their computing and crawler resource.

By: Business Consultant

Business Consultant — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:54:26 +0000

This is a noce blog full of nforamtive stuff. My comment would only be that I’ve been playing around with the URL parameters Google has to offer a lot lately, mostly after the de-personalized search stuff.

By: How to Create Unique Content from Scratch | The Logicfish Blog

How to Create Unique Content from Scratch | The Logicfish Blog — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:28:02 +0000

[...] Google Now Lets You Strip Parameters from URLs (marketingpilgrim.com) [...]

By: Recruiter

Recruiter — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:11:57 +0000

I’ve just implemented Google’s Webmaster suggestions yesterday; it seems a good move, anything to make spidering and indexing the site easier; but I’ll see the real consequences over the coming week – you can always reset.

With the canonical, I just implement 301s as there’s enough Meta tags in the header already.

Thanks for the article, as always well up to date.
.-= Recruiter´s last blog ...Net Team Lead / Technical Architect / Development Manager (DC4859) =-.

By: Jessica

Jessica — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:46:43 +0000

I would prefer using the canonical tag. I like the idea of knowing that I can only screw up one page at a time , and of course ultimately this will be the most universal.

-Jess