<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Patents Simple Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-82835</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html#comment-82835</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think google will enforce their patent legally unless one of their major competitors infringe on it. It will extremely hard and a waste of resources to go after all of the small guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think google will enforce their patent legally unless one of their major competitors infringe on it. It will extremely hard and a waste of resources to go after all of the small guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Add Link</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-82793</link>
		<dc:creator>Add Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html#comment-82793</guid>
		<description>I Wouldn&#039;t of thought it would be possible to grant a patent like that&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Wouldn&#8217;t of thought it would be possible to grant a patent like that&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Patents Simple Search &#124; Search engine optimization live today</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-82590</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Patents Simple Search &#124; Search engine optimization live today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html#comment-82590</guid>
		<description>[...] filler of its wager index, but the distributed &#8230;   Go here to wager the original:  Google Patents Simple Search      Posted in Uncategorized &#124;  Tags: google, immense-size, massive-success, not-the, secrets, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] filler of its wager index, but the distributed &#8230;   Go here to wager the original:  Google Patents Simple Search      Posted in Uncategorized |  Tags: google, immense-size, massive-success, not-the, secrets, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-82586</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html#comment-82586</guid>
		<description>So is Google going to invent a time machine so that it can go back into the past and take on the simple search interfaces that preceded it?

The USPTO needs to update its research tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is Google going to invent a time machine so that it can go back into the past and take on the simple search interfaces that preceded it?</p>
<p>The USPTO needs to update its research tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-82581</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/09/google-patents-simple-search.html#comment-82581</guid>
		<description>I understand getting a patent for the underlying technology, but the interface? Maybe this is naivete speaking (it certainly could be) but isn&#039;t this similar to a book publisher trying to patent the structure of a paperback?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand getting a patent for the underlying technology, but the interface? Maybe this is naivete speaking (it certainly could be) but isn&#8217;t this similar to a book publisher trying to patent the structure of a paperback?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

