<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality: Business or Politics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eunice Coughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html/comment-page-1#comment-96035</link>
		<dc:creator>Eunice Coughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13801#comment-96035</guid>
		<description>Whenever government starts to get involved in business, confusion always enters in. So as I understand it, the main reason that we need net neutrality is to stop these broadband providers from blocking access to their competition? And the internet-using public has no idea that this is going on? If I&#039;ve got it right,  then shouldn&#039;t this sort of activity already be covered under anti-trust laws? I think there&#039;s more to this call for regulation than meets the eye.  

What bothers me about government intervention in the free market is that there always seems to be a price to pay, usually in the form of restricting other freedoms. I betcha somewhere deep in the rules that they decide to adopt, there&#039;ll be some way that the government can commandeer the internet to protect our national security. I am not bashing either party; I know what both are capable of. I&#039;m just sayin&#039;. 

It&#039;ll be interesting to see how this all shakes out and I hope that the public will be paying attention.
.-= Eunice Coughlin´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eunicecoughlin.com/free-tony-robbins-audio.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Free Tony Robbins Audio&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever government starts to get involved in business, confusion always enters in. So as I understand it, the main reason that we need net neutrality is to stop these broadband providers from blocking access to their competition? And the internet-using public has no idea that this is going on? If I&#8217;ve got it right,  then shouldn&#8217;t this sort of activity already be covered under anti-trust laws? I think there&#8217;s more to this call for regulation than meets the eye.  </p>
<p>What bothers me about government intervention in the free market is that there always seems to be a price to pay, usually in the form of restricting other freedoms. I betcha somewhere deep in the rules that they decide to adopt, there&#8217;ll be some way that the government can commandeer the internet to protect our national security. I am not bashing either party; I know what both are capable of. I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how this all shakes out and I hope that the public will be paying attention.<br />
.-= Eunice Coughlin´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.eunicecoughlin.com/free-tony-robbins-audio.html" rel="nofollow">Free Tony Robbins Audio</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W. Furst</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html/comment-page-1#comment-95951</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13801#comment-95951</guid>
		<description>Quite honestly, I am confused! I have promoted net neutrality to my readers in the past. Common sense says, &quot;net neutrality,&quot; is a very good thing. About a year ago the enemy of net neutrality was &quot;greedy corporate America,&quot; now I hear, &quot;the market actually works, the government is evil.&quot;

I agree its always good to keep the government out, but I am still a bit confused.
.-= John W. Furst´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog-feeds.fcon21.biz/~r/Ebiz-booster-blog/~3/19kfPRxmxSU/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter Sucks Worse Than ADD Plus 5 Bonus Tips&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite honestly, I am confused! I have promoted net neutrality to my readers in the past. Common sense says, &#8220;net neutrality,&#8221; is a very good thing. About a year ago the enemy of net neutrality was &#8220;greedy corporate America,&#8221; now I hear, &#8220;the market actually works, the government is evil.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree its always good to keep the government out, but I am still a bit confused.<br />
.-= John W. Furst´s last blog ..<a href="http://blog-feeds.fcon21.biz/~r/Ebiz-booster-blog/~3/19kfPRxmxSU/" rel="nofollow">Twitter Sucks Worse Than ADD Plus 5 Bonus Tips</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html/comment-page-1#comment-95873</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13801#comment-95873</guid>
		<description>I think there will always be a portion of both business and politics. Especially where the government is involved. It&#039;s more of a what is going to benefit me. We need some sort of net neutrality. We need someone that will put a stop to isp&#039;s blocking certain traffic on their networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there will always be a portion of both business and politics. Especially where the government is involved. It&#8217;s more of a what is going to benefit me. We need some sort of net neutrality. We need someone that will put a stop to isp&#8217;s blocking certain traffic on their networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality: Business or Politics? &#171; News</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/net-neutrality-business-or-politics.html/comment-page-1#comment-95824</link>
		<dc:creator>Net Neutrality: Business or Politics? &#171; News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13801#comment-95824</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read the rest: Net Neutrality: Business or Politics?   Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read the rest: Net Neutrality: Business or Politics?   Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

