<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:14:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-96878</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-96878</guid>
		<description>The Digg &amp; Twitter locations in the chart surprise me. I&#039;d expect those two to be flipped based on what I&#039;ve seen.
.-= Ed Kohler´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheDeets/~3/i4rI8pMoAxc/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TP at Sheraton Boston Hotel, Boston, MA&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Digg &amp; Twitter locations in the chart surprise me. I&#8217;d expect those two to be flipped based on what I&#8217;ve seen.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Ed Kohler´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheDeets/~3/i4rI8pMoAxc/" rel="nofollow">TP at Sheraton Boston Hotel, Boston, MA</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search &#124; The Perfect Storm Team</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-96686</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search &#124; The Perfect Storm Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-96686</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symptoms Of Panic Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-96226</link>
		<dc:creator>Symptoms Of Panic Attacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-96226</guid>
		<description>Too bad I really never got into Facebook. I just could never understand the whole concept of it and Twitter. Who knows maybe I am missing something; but I just could not stand the fact of using those sites.
.-= Symptoms Of Panic Attacks´s last undefined ..&lt;a href=&quot;0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If you register your site for free at &lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad I really never got into Facebook. I just could never understand the whole concept of it and Twitter. Who knows maybe I am missing something; but I just could not stand the fact of using those sites.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Symptoms Of Panic Attacks´s last undefined ..<a href="0" rel="nofollow">If you register your site for free at </a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrow SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-96196</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrow SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-96196</guid>
		<description>Wow! Facebook is great, getting the most visitor loyalty is not that surprising. Twitter has lots of media coverage, very surprising they are the lowest on the stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Facebook is great, getting the most visitor loyalty is not that surprising. Twitter has lots of media coverage, very surprising they are the lowest on the stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday Social Marketing Round-Up &#8212; pamorama</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-96071</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday Social Marketing Round-Up &#8212; pamorama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-96071</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search ~ While we all like our sites to have visitors, a loyal visitor—one who returns for later visits—is especially valuable. And &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Sites Send Fewer, but More Loyal Visitors than Search ~ While we all like our sites to have visitors, a loyal visitor—one who returns for later visits—is especially valuable. And &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Lönn</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-95939</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Lönn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-95939</guid>
		<description>These reports are never black and white. If I google and find a facebook group or digg post, that lead to your page, does this count as Google, Facebook or digg?

If the user mentioned above returns every week and follow your progress via Twitter or RSS feeds the rest of the days but never follow a link from Twitter, in what bar is this loyalty counted for?

it all depends on the whole picture and it is never about choosing one or the other. 

Go for both search AND Social media AND the next big thing.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These reports are never black and white. If I google and find a facebook group or digg post, that lead to your page, does this count as Google, Facebook or digg?</p>
<p>If the user mentioned above returns every week and follow your progress via Twitter or RSS feeds the rest of the days but never follow a link from Twitter, in what bar is this loyalty counted for?</p>
<p>it all depends on the whole picture and it is never about choosing one or the other. </p>
<p>Go for both search AND Social media AND the next big thing&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-95547</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-95547</guid>
		<description>This is why I am a big fan of Facebook advertising.. You can really target groups of interested people, rather than just put it all out there with the other public advertising networks. I&#039;ve seen great examples of how much better CTR&#039;s and conversions are for social ads rather than just plain web/search advertising.
.-= Aaron´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ezwebsitemonitoring.com/blog/bing-announces-search-for-twitter-feeds&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bing announces search for Twitter feeds&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I am a big fan of Facebook advertising.. You can really target groups of interested people, rather than just put it all out there with the other public advertising networks. I&#8217;ve seen great examples of how much better CTR&#8217;s and conversions are for social ads rather than just plain web/search advertising.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Aaron´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.ezwebsitemonitoring.com/blog/bing-announces-search-for-twitter-feeds" rel="nofollow">Bing announces search for Twitter feeds</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-95529</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-95529</guid>
		<description>Hi,

For me Facebook is the best way to promote my services, items ( interior design), I have facebook group and page and i can say in 2 month i double the visits and the sells.
Twitter is good only to send bombastic message, eg, huge promotion only today ...
Google is no longer an option, we receive alot of visits but the sells are down.
Visit www.4udecor.blogspot.com 

Thx 
Patricia
4udecor
.-= Patricia´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/4udecorcom/~3/SiUhFD95W-4/cadeiras-para-contract-punk-shark.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cadeiras para Contract Punk / Shark&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>For me Facebook is the best way to promote my services, items ( interior design), I have facebook group and page and i can say in 2 month i double the visits and the sells.<br />
Twitter is good only to send bombastic message, eg, huge promotion only today &#8230;<br />
Google is no longer an option, we receive alot of visits but the sells are down.<br />
Visit <a href="http://www.4udecor.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.4udecor.blogspot.com</a> </p>
<p>Thx<br />
Patricia<br />
4udecor<br />
<span class="cluv"> Patricia´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/4udecorcom/~3/SiUhFD95W-4/cadeiras-para-contract-punk-shark.html" rel="nofollow">Cadeiras para Contract Punk / Shark</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mescher</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/social-sites-send-fewer-but-more-loyal-visitors-than-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-95504</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mescher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=13778#comment-95504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Facebook&lt;/strong&gt; vs &lt;strong&gt;Twitter&lt;/strong&gt; Loyalty doesn&#039;t surprise me, because Twitter is a no-holds-barred, anyone can follow by opting in social site. 

Facebook, on the other hand, requires acceptance in the form of friend requests, and the page is curated to feel more like a scrapbook/family experience than the fast and furious Twitter &#039;PR&#039; style.

Something I would like to add to the discussion is how &lt;strong&gt;Social Media&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Drives&lt;/em&gt; search.  Search and social coexist, and the more loyal followers you get speaking about you/your brand/business on the socials, the more likely you are to make a substantive impact on your search campaigns too.

Good news for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.SocialMediaCommando.com/Blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media Commandos&lt;/a&gt; like me!
.-= Joe Mescher´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joemescher.com/2009/10/social-media-drives-search/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media Drives Search&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Facebook</strong> vs <strong>Twitter</strong> Loyalty doesn&#8217;t surprise me, because Twitter is a no-holds-barred, anyone can follow by opting in social site. </p>
<p>Facebook, on the other hand, requires acceptance in the form of friend requests, and the page is curated to feel more like a scrapbook/family experience than the fast and furious Twitter &#8216;PR&#8217; style.</p>
<p>Something I would like to add to the discussion is how <strong>Social Media</strong> <em>Drives</em> search.  Search and social coexist, and the more loyal followers you get speaking about you/your brand/business on the socials, the more likely you are to make a substantive impact on your search campaigns too.</p>
<p>Good news for the <a href="http://www.SocialMediaCommando.com/Blog" rel="nofollow">Social Media Commandos</a> like me!<br />
<span class="cluv"> Joe Mescher´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.joemescher.com/2009/10/social-media-drives-search/" rel="nofollow">Social Media Drives Search</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
