<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaidPolMediaPro</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html/comment-page-1#comment-95555</link>
		<dc:creator>PaidPolMediaPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html#comment-95555</guid>
		<description>Your solution also doesn&#039;t take into account the types of ads that don&#039;t require a click to have an effect: impression-based advertising where the simple act of seeing the ad - without clicking it - sends a message to the viewer. Even if it&#039;s not technically paid for yet, that impression could be a negative attack ad, a positive issues-stance, or anything else (including straight fraudulent claims or libel). Letting campaigns influence voter opinion in this way (subtle, I realize, but it has a very real, demonstrable effect) without putting their name on it is creating a niche for online guerilla warfare in the political arena, and is currently leading to major problems around the country. This issue will come to a head during the 2012 election, if not sooner, and is really going to mess with internet campaign finance law in general, an area that is still pretty legally grey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your solution also doesn&#8217;t take into account the types of ads that don&#8217;t require a click to have an effect: impression-based advertising where the simple act of seeing the ad &#8211; without clicking it &#8211; sends a message to the viewer. Even if it&#8217;s not technically paid for yet, that impression could be a negative attack ad, a positive issues-stance, or anything else (including straight fraudulent claims or libel). Letting campaigns influence voter opinion in this way (subtle, I realize, but it has a very real, demonstrable effect) without putting their name on it is creating a niche for online guerilla warfare in the political arena, and is currently leading to major problems around the country. This issue will come to a head during the 2012 election, if not sooner, and is really going to mess with internet campaign finance law in general, an area that is still pretty legally grey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine! — Affiliates Insider: Showing You The Insides</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html/comment-page-1#comment-94974</link>
		<dc:creator>Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine! — Affiliates Insider: Showing You The Insides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html#comment-94974</guid>
		<description>[...] this article: Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine!    Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this article: Warning! That Political Ad on Google Could Cost You a $250 Fine!    Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hershel Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html/comment-page-1#comment-94690</link>
		<dc:creator>Hershel Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html#comment-94690</guid>
		<description>your solution is far too simple for beaurocracy to agree with
.-= Hershel Miller´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madisonwisconsinliving.com/wisconsin-real-estate-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wisconsin Real Estate Update&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your solution is far too simple for beaurocracy to agree with<br />
.-= Hershel Miller´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.madisonwisconsinliving.com/wisconsin-real-estate-update/" rel="nofollow">Wisconsin Real Estate Update</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elmer Boutin</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html/comment-page-1#comment-94680</link>
		<dc:creator>Elmer Boutin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/warning-that-political-ad-on-google-could-cost-you-a-250-fine.html#comment-94680</guid>
		<description>Now this is an interesting conundrum. 

Your solution is simple. It&#039;s also quite realistic and practical. But yet, you&#039;re right that it may be too simple. 

I wonder how many complaints of this type we&#039;ll see as the next election cycle closes in.
.-= Elmer Boutin´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/crossingmarketingandit/lYbr/~3/JvkqqIU7i4c/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Agile Teams&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is an interesting conundrum. </p>
<p>Your solution is simple. It&#8217;s also quite realistic and practical. But yet, you&#8217;re right that it may be too simple. </p>
<p>I wonder how many complaints of this type we&#8217;ll see as the next election cycle closes in.<br />
.-= Elmer Boutin´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/crossingmarketingandit/lYbr/~3/JvkqqIU7i4c/" rel="nofollow">Agile Teams</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

