<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forrester Looks at Interactive Marketing by Segment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Sydney</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-102899</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14208#comment-102899</guid>
		<description>Forrester&#039;s rational is that it wanted to look at both independent and holding ... list of interactive agencies, defines the segment differently..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forrester&#8217;s rational is that it wanted to look at both independent and holding &#8230; list of interactive agencies, defines the segment differently..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy AKA @SEMChick</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-101678</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy AKA @SEMChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14208#comment-101678</guid>
		<description>I concur. These figures must be wrong, based on my client management experience.

I would also like to see health services represented here. And perhaps Insurance broken out of the Financial segment.

If categories including both B2B and B2C could be broken down it would be even more telling.
.-= Nancy AKA @SEMChick´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/SEMChick/statuses/5678628380&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEMChick: Yes, it is Friday. Enjoy it people!&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur. These figures must be wrong, based on my client management experience.</p>
<p>I would also like to see health services represented here. And perhaps Insurance broken out of the Financial segment.</p>
<p>If categories including both B2B and B2C could be broken down it would be even more telling.<br />
.-= Nancy AKA @SEMChick´s last blog ..<a href="http://twitter.com/SEMChick/statuses/5678628380" rel="nofollow">SEMChick: Yes, it is Friday. Enjoy it people!</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Waggoner</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-101570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Waggoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14208#comment-101570</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m just stupid, but this graph doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense to me. Ad spends in every one of those categories is much, much higher than portrayed. I&#039;d believe if the graph was in billions, but not millions. Is this on a per-firm basis or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just stupid, but this graph doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to me. Ad spends in every one of those categories is much, much higher than portrayed. I&#8217;d believe if the graph was in billions, but not millions. Is this on a per-firm basis or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Wittlake</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-101511</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Wittlake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14208#comment-101511</guid>
		<description>The distribution is interesting, but what do the actual numbers represent? A lot of in category marketers spend more than what is presented here as the category total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distribution is interesting, but what do the actual numbers represent? A lot of in category marketers spend more than what is presented here as the category total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interactive Marketing By Industry and Tactic &#124; LOHAD - random rumblings on marketing and more</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/forrester-looks-at-interactive-marketing-by-segment.html/comment-page-1#comment-101443</link>
		<dc:creator>Interactive Marketing By Industry and Tactic &#124; LOHAD - random rumblings on marketing and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14208#comment-101443</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Pilgrim alerts us to a series of reports from Forrester that examine how different industries are utilizing various online marketing tactics. Does search or display dominate? Where do mobile and social media fit in? Interesting stuff. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Pilgrim alerts us to a series of reports from Forrester that examine how different industries are utilizing various online marketing tactics. Does search or display dominate? Where do mobile and social media fit in? Interesting stuff. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

