<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Lets You Preview 6-Year Old Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-99175</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-99175</guid>
		<description>The Fast Food Web Approaches At Blinding Speed...

Thanks for the tip-off!

cheers
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fast Food Web Approaches At Blinding Speed&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip-off!</p>
<p>cheers<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saima Farooque</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98897</link>
		<dc:creator>Saima Farooque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98897</guid>
		<description>Very nice post !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice post !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new year</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98882</link>
		<dc:creator>new year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98882</guid>
		<description>very good!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98699</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98699</guid>
		<description>I might be interested to see if they apply the same &quot;new technology&quot; to the sponsor links in order to avoid useless clicks and click fraud.........but that might sound like shooting yourself on the foot since now they cannot charge for all the waste so users can preview the ads first........uhmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be interested to see if they apply the same &#8220;new technology&#8221; to the sponsor links in order to avoid useless clicks and click fraud&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but that might sound like shooting yourself on the foot since now they cannot charge for all the waste so users can preview the ads first&#8230;&#8230;..uhmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98661</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98661</guid>
		<description>We can now official diagnose Google with Microsoft Syndrome.  They are leaders in innovation because they follow everyone else&#039;s footsteps and claim to be innovators.

Google was the third search engine to introduce Blended/Universal Search -- but most people are not aware of that.  A9 was the first to do it.
.-= Michael Martinez´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BestSeoBlog/~3/88Nv2JzNH40/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Using Blogger for SEO&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can now official diagnose Google with Microsoft Syndrome.  They are leaders in innovation because they follow everyone else&#8217;s footsteps and claim to be innovators.</p>
<p>Google was the third search engine to introduce Blended/Universal Search &#8212; but most people are not aware of that.  A9 was the first to do it.<br />
.-= Michael Martinez´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BestSeoBlog/~3/88Nv2JzNH40/" rel="nofollow">Using Blogger for SEO</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98654</link>
		<dc:creator>David Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98654</guid>
		<description>Does Google&#039;s new search feature make any difference?  Better searching experience or more confusion?
.-= David Walker´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidwalker.tv/positioning-yourself-as-an-expert/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Positioning Yourself as an Expert&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Google&#8217;s new search feature make any difference?  Better searching experience or more confusion?<br />
.-= David Walker´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.davidwalker.tv/positioning-yourself-as-an-expert/" rel="nofollow">Positioning Yourself as an Expert</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98647</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98647</guid>
		<description>Truthfully?  It looks gross.  I thought Google UI research would be better than this.
.-= Jaan Kanellis´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jaankanellis.com/google-analytics-powerful-flexible-intelligentbut/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Analytics More Powerful, Flexible And Intelligent…BUT WHEN?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truthfully?  It looks gross.  I thought Google UI research would be better than this.<br />
.-= Jaan Kanellis´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.jaankanellis.com/google-analytics-powerful-flexible-intelligentbut/" rel="nofollow">Google Analytics More Powerful, Flexible And Intelligent…BUT WHEN?</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: searchengineman</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html/comment-page-1#comment-98585</link>
		<dc:creator>searchengineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/google-lets-you-preview-6-year-old-technology.html#comment-98585</guid>
		<description>Only an engineer could come up with something this ugly.  I think there is a more elegant way they could have done this.  My guess is the decision is a technical reason, so the maximum amount of users can see the same results with out Java, Ajax etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only an engineer could come up with something this ugly.  I think there is a more elegant way they could have done this.  My guess is the decision is a technical reason, so the maximum amount of users can see the same results with out Java, Ajax etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

