<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Antisocial?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Terminator</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102481</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Terminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102481</guid>
		<description>I have never known Google to take a service down so quickly either but there are only a million things that can go wrong so we will probably never know the reason.
.-= Google Terminator´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://googleterminatorinfo.org/google-terminator-review-update&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Terminator Review Update&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never known Google to take a service down so quickly either but there are only a million things that can go wrong so we will probably never know the reason.<br />
.-= Google Terminator´s last blog ..<a href="http://googleterminatorinfo.org/google-terminator-review-update" rel="nofollow">Google Terminator Review Update</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102376</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102376</guid>
		<description>Hah! Yes, we finally got to see behind the Google curtain! ;-)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sel/4106844563/in/set-72157622687178653/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Yes, we finally got to see behind the Google curtain! <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>http://www.flickr.com/photos/sel/4106844563/in/set-72157622687178653/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Overland</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102363</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Overland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102363</guid>
		<description>I was surprised to see the cancellation message on the weekend, and had to go to labs to figure out which experiment was cancelled (would be nice to see more info in the message). 

But that aside, it could be that people have figured out how to use the service to compile more information than Google is comfortable with. 

There&#039;s also the possibility that it&#039;s not Google&#039;s servers that were getting hammered (Google is a master of scalability), but a slowdown in one of the connections. I doubt Google would want Social Search to slow down SERP retrieval rates.
.-= Helen Overland´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEnginePeople/~3/Kec5gmVD5pg/link-mining-backlink-gem.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link Mining for Backlink Gems&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised to see the cancellation message on the weekend, and had to go to labs to figure out which experiment was cancelled (would be nice to see more info in the message). </p>
<p>But that aside, it could be that people have figured out how to use the service to compile more information than Google is comfortable with. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the possibility that it&#8217;s not Google&#8217;s servers that were getting hammered (Google is a master of scalability), but a slowdown in one of the connections. I doubt Google would want Social Search to slow down SERP retrieval rates.<br />
.-= Helen Overland´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEnginePeople/~3/Kec5gmVD5pg/link-mining-backlink-gem.html" rel="nofollow">Link Mining for Backlink Gems</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Strader</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102361</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Strader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102361</guid>
		<description>#4 the &quot;bing people&quot; that pulled the skirt off Matt&#039;s table during the &quot;smackdown&quot;
.-= Pat Strader´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/matterhorn/~3/o7x3jYZrXfY/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Three Things You Should Be Doing (But Probably Aren’t)&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 the &#8220;bing people&#8221; that pulled the skirt off Matt&#8217;s table during the &#8220;smackdown&#8221;<br />
.-= Pat Strader´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/matterhorn/~3/o7x3jYZrXfY/" rel="nofollow">Three Things You Should Be Doing (But Probably Aren’t)</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102346</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102346</guid>
		<description>I think Google has had a fairly easy path so far.  They&#039;ve been able to compete on technology alone, and were a fairly disruptive change to the search space.  Think Altavista, Yahoo, etc. all burdened by the legacy of investing in previous search metaphors.

This lack of human factor is reinforced in other areas.  For instance, user interface is dictated by numbers, rather than trying for innovative design.

That they bring down services like this shouldn&#039;t be a surprise.  It&#039;s in a lab setting, even if half their products are in perpetual beta.  What is concerning is they haven&#039;t learned better PR skills at communicating this information.  PR is less efficient than a system error, but you need it to retain loyalty.

The best experience brands are focusing on the experience, driving effectiveness, and not just the efficiency side of the equation.  With newly energized competitors like Bing (with it&#039;s own impressive technology) coming out with great features and trying to capture mindshare, I&#039;d think Google better start learning some social skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google has had a fairly easy path so far.  They&#8217;ve been able to compete on technology alone, and were a fairly disruptive change to the search space.  Think Altavista, Yahoo, etc. all burdened by the legacy of investing in previous search metaphors.</p>
<p>This lack of human factor is reinforced in other areas.  For instance, user interface is dictated by numbers, rather than trying for innovative design.</p>
<p>That they bring down services like this shouldn&#8217;t be a surprise.  It&#8217;s in a lab setting, even if half their products are in perpetual beta.  What is concerning is they haven&#8217;t learned better PR skills at communicating this information.  PR is less efficient than a system error, but you need it to retain loyalty.</p>
<p>The best experience brands are focusing on the experience, driving effectiveness, and not just the efficiency side of the equation.  With newly energized competitors like Bing (with it&#8217;s own impressive technology) coming out with great features and trying to capture mindshare, I&#8217;d think Google better start learning some social skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102314</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102314</guid>
		<description>What they have on you is so scary, they had to shut down the entire service! :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they have on you is so scary, they had to shut down the entire service! <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html/comment-page-1#comment-102300</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/is-google-antisocial.html#comment-102300</guid>
		<description>Google doesn&#039;t have any information on me do they?
.-= Frank Reed´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frankthinking.com/pr-means-premature-readiness-for-nec/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PR Means “Premature Readiness” for NEC&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t have any information on me do they?<br />
.-= Frank Reed´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.frankthinking.com/pr-means-premature-readiness-for-nec/" rel="nofollow">PR Means “Premature Readiness” for NEC</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

