<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Bloggers Discuss Products/Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/most-bloggers-discuss-productsbrands.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/most-bloggers-discuss-productsbrands.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:22:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marketing to Mommy Bloggers and The FTC &#124; Community Management Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/most-bloggers-discuss-productsbrands.html/comment-page-1#comment-102149</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing to Mommy Bloggers and The FTC &#124; Community Management Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14112#comment-102149</guid>
		<description>[...] Most Bloggers Discuss Products/Brands (marketingpilgrim.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most Bloggers Discuss Products/Brands (marketingpilgrim.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmad Barirani</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/11/most-bloggers-discuss-productsbrands.html/comment-page-1#comment-100066</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmad Barirani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=14112#comment-100066</guid>
		<description>My opinion is that some social networks are spam free. This is the case with Wikipedia. In fact, searching for accurate information is sometimes easier on Wikipedia that Google! However, other forms of social media (ex: blogs) contain a lot of marketing oriented information that do not have real value to the reader.
I think social media will needs regulations to be better for the collectivity. I don&#039;t mean regulations in the sense of what FTC is doing, but also internal regulation like in Wikipedia where experts control and filter the media&#039;s information.
.-= Ahmad Barirani´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SingularTechnologies/~3/gUZc5J04I5w/if-the-reliable-search-result-is-wikipedia-then-why-use-google&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;If the Reliable Search Result is Wikipedia, Then Why use Google?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is that some social networks are spam free. This is the case with Wikipedia. In fact, searching for accurate information is sometimes easier on Wikipedia that Google! However, other forms of social media (ex: blogs) contain a lot of marketing oriented information that do not have real value to the reader.<br />
I think social media will needs regulations to be better for the collectivity. I don&#8217;t mean regulations in the sense of what FTC is doing, but also internal regulation like in Wikipedia where experts control and filter the media&#8217;s information.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Ahmad Barirani´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SingularTechnologies/~3/gUZc5J04I5w/if-the-reliable-search-result-is-wikipedia-then-why-use-google" rel="nofollow">If the Reliable Search Result is Wikipedia, Then Why use Google?</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
