<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Ditches Answers.com, Raising Questions About the Dictionary&#8217;s Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice B</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-106217</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html#comment-106217</guid>
		<description>I loved the Answers.com link when I&#039;d search a word on Google and--since it&#039;s departure--I&#039;ve found Google&#039;s dictionary a lot less helpful (though I hope it improves). So I now click directly to Answers.com. I find its thesaurus more helpful. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Answers.com link when I&#8217;d search a word on Google and&#8211;since it&#8217;s departure&#8211;I&#8217;ve found Google&#8217;s dictionary a lot less helpful (though I hope it improves). So I now click directly to Answers.com. I find its thesaurus more helpful. <img src='http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-104317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html#comment-104317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a voracious user of Google for looking up definitions too..But seriously Andy, I hadn&#039;t noticed the definition link on the top right until you mentioned it here..Maybe the placement is not right..
.-= Anand Srinivasan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunchies/~3/XkEr8yhX9qI/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Average Mobile Internet Sessions Per Month&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a voracious user of Google for looking up definitions too..But seriously Andy, I hadn&#8217;t noticed the definition link on the top right until you mentioned it here..Maybe the placement is not right..<br />
.-= Anand Srinivasan´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunchies/~3/XkEr8yhX9qI/" rel="nofollow">Average Mobile Internet Sessions Per Month</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-104232</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html#comment-104232</guid>
		<description>Wow, really? Less than 5%? Congrats! 

I figured it would account for a lot more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, really? Less than 5%? Congrats! </p>
<p>I figured it would account for a lot more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Rosenschein</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-104231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Rosenschein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html#comment-104231</guid>
		<description>We at Answers.com have appreciated the Google definition link for almost the last 5 years. We already informed our investors at the beginning of November about the expected change. While I&#039;m sorry to see it go, it is not material -- under 5% of our traffic. At this point, most of our traffic and revenue come from our user-generated Q&amp;A site, WikiAnswers. Thank you.
-- Bob Rosenschein
   CEO, Answers.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We at Answers.com have appreciated the Google definition link for almost the last 5 years. We already informed our investors at the beginning of November about the expected change. While I&#8217;m sorry to see it go, it is not material &#8212; under 5% of our traffic. At this point, most of our traffic and revenue come from our user-generated Q&amp;A site, WikiAnswers. Thank you.<br />
&#8211; Bob Rosenschein<br />
   CEO, Answers.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-104230</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/12/google-ditches-answers-com-raising-questions-about-the-dictionarys-future.html#comment-104230</guid>
		<description>There are so many dictionaries available on line that i really don&#039;t think this is a big issue. Even google have to streamline at times and focus on their more important projects</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many dictionaries available on line that i really don&#8217;t think this is a big issue. Even google have to streamline at times and focus on their more important projects</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

