<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Works for Weight Loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html/comment-page-1#comment-108753</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=15239#comment-108753</guid>
		<description>These marketers have ways of convincing people they have a problem by showing them a solution and.... it works enough for them to keep bringing in money.  See they know approx. what percentage of a return they can get by sending out emails and such.  That&#039;s why there is so much of it.  It would be interesting to see a more in depth study with a wider sample.  Thanks for the post!
.-= Mike´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://weightlosstargets.com/a-look-back-at-2009-in-words-and-photos/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Look Back At 2009 In Words And Photos&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These marketers have ways of convincing people they have a problem by showing them a solution and&#8230;. it works enough for them to keep bringing in money.  See they know approx. what percentage of a return they can get by sending out emails and such.  That&#8217;s why there is so much of it.  It would be interesting to see a more in depth study with a wider sample.  Thanks for the post!<br />
.-= Mike´s last blog ..<a href="http://weightlosstargets.com/a-look-back-at-2009-in-words-and-photos/" rel="nofollow">A Look Back At 2009 In Words And Photos</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html/comment-page-1#comment-106548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=15239#comment-106548</guid>
		<description>The limitations of the survey are pretty clear, but it does indicate why all those spammers and low quality &#039;get rich quick&#039; people still seem to be around and prospering after ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The limitations of the survey are pretty clear, but it does indicate why all those spammers and low quality &#8216;get rich quick&#8217; people still seem to be around and prospering after ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan McCollum</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html/comment-page-1#comment-106473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan McCollum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=15239#comment-106473</guid>
		<description>Your math is absolutely correct. But actually, the MediaPost article says that 5% of &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; those with weight loss issues purchased from the spam&#8212;so if we assume that none of the students had weight loss issues, that would mean 36 opened and 10 purchased. 

Sorry if that wasn&#039;t clear in the article; I hadn&#039;t considered that angle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your math is absolutely correct. But actually, the MediaPost article says that 5% of <em>all</em> those with weight loss issues purchased from the spam&mdash;so if we assume that none of the students had weight loss issues, that would mean 36 opened and 10 purchased. </p>
<p>Sorry if that wasn&#8217;t clear in the article; I hadn&#8217;t considered that angle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HB</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/01/spam-works-for-weight-loss.html/comment-page-1#comment-106472</link>
		<dc:creator>HB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/?p=15239#comment-106472</guid>
		<description>200 people surveyed...
unknown percent of those are &quot;without weight issues&quot; (not specified)...
18% of those opened weight loss spam mail...
5% of those bought something?

Even assuming NONE of the students have weight issues, that means 1.8 of them bought something due to spam e-mail. Since you can&#039;t have 0.8 people, at least some of the students apparently had weight issues to make that 5% equal 1.

&quot;One student bought spam.&quot; — Southern Medical Journal
.-= HB´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://arguments.callee.info/2009/12/25/quick-tip-regarding-chrome-frame&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quick Tip Regarding Google Chrome Frame&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200 people surveyed&#8230;<br />
unknown percent of those are &#8220;without weight issues&#8221; (not specified)&#8230;<br />
18% of those opened weight loss spam mail&#8230;<br />
5% of those bought something?</p>
<p>Even assuming NONE of the students have weight issues, that means 1.8 of them bought something due to spam e-mail. Since you can&#8217;t have 0.8 people, at least some of the students apparently had weight issues to make that 5% equal 1.</p>
<p>&#8220;One student bought spam.&#8221; — Southern Medical Journal<br />
.-= HB´s last blog ..<a href="http://arguments.callee.info/2009/12/25/quick-tip-regarding-chrome-frame" rel="nofollow">Quick Tip Regarding Google Chrome Frame</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

