Posted February 25, 2010 8:33 am by with 4 comments

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on FacebookBuffer this page

While everyone is concerned about just how Google will eventually take over the world and implant chips in everyone so they can search for your real time position at any time in real time for real information (do you get the sarcasm here?) there is one area where Google is not going to do as well as the competition (read: bing). That is real time search results for Facebook.

Google has announced that Facebook Pages status updates have started to be included in real time search results. This is added to their addition of Twitter and MySpace info to search results as well. Where Google is not going to be effective, though, is Facebook and Venture Beat’s Digital Beat tells us why

The key thing to remember, however, is that Google has much more limited access to Facebook’s real-time data than its competitor, Bing. Microsoft has deeper ties to the social network, as an investor in Facebook and as a search provider for the site. Microsoft has the ability to index public status updates, while Google’s access is limited to updates from Pages, which are vehicles for marketing rather than personal content.

While this may be seen as a disadvantage by some, I don’t necessarily see it that way. I go to a search engine to get information about different subjects of interest, products, business data and general entertainment. Honestly, I don’t want to see personal Facebook updates in any search engine. It’s just creepy. I think that updates from Facebook Pages, however, can be of help and it doesn’t have any creepiness factor to it. It’s marketing information for the most part so that can only get as weird as everyday marketing can get. No harm there.

Now, I know that this is just my opinion so it would be good to hear from others. Considering all the flak that Facebook has received about privacy should personal updates be included in search results for bing since many are likely still clueless about just how much of their information is public? Do you want to see that information?

  • Adding personal status updates just creates even more noise to have to sort through. Fan pages do as well, but at least they would not be as mundane (giving benefit of the doubt) or as irrelevant as personal status updates.

    I think it would be silly to include them.
    .-= Pat Strader´s last blog ..What You Can Learn From Jerry Garcia =-.

  • Mat

    I agree… I wouldn’t want to see personal updates anyways. If I want to see personal updates I’ll go the FB homepage and login.

  • Agreed that it’s too unnecessary and a bit strange to include personal status updates in search results. I think many FB users would object to that. Sticking to pages updates makes sense, and might even be useful to a searcher.
    .-= Chelsea´s last blog ..Strategic Guru Renews Marketing Engagement With Environmental Engineering Firm =-.

  • Of course I don’t want to see my personal updates on search results nor anyone else’s! Just a bunch of noise and trivial information that I want to see clogging up the SERPs!
    .-= Rex Freiberger´s last blog ..Goo Goo for Google Analytics Was Goo-reat! =-.