Posted July 25, 2010 12:45 am by with 8 comments

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on FacebookBuffer this page

As the definition of a journalist gets stretched to the outer limits due to the proliferation of content farms and $10 per ‘article’ writers, it’s understandable that there is some concern in the ranks. It’s not there won’t be outlets for their work but it’s more about the state of the traditional outlets where most have made their living.

Mashable reports on a recent survey which reveal these concerns

In a survey conducted over May and June this year, PR network Oriella asked media moguls how the Internet was affecting their business, their publishing formats and even the quality of the content issuing forth from their newsrooms.

In a survey of 770 journalists across 15 countries, the company determined that, while media creators are slightly more optimistic than they were last year about maintaining revenues vis-a-vis the rise of online ad budgets, many are still worried about whether traditional media formats can succeed in the long run.

“Concerns about the viability of journalists’ traditional media channels (print, radio or television) have intensified,” the report reads.

Of course, loss of advertising dollars leads the way for concern about viability of traditional media offerings. Since more and more people are moving online for their news, there will be fewer dollars available from advertisers who can support the kind of staffs that these outlets traditionally require.

Since most people can see the chain reaction of these concerns the next obvious worry is if their traditional offline mediums will survive or just go away (if that hasn’t happened already).

In the end, there may be no stopping these sweeping changes. Many act as if it’s the fault of the traditional media themselves but it’s really just people changing and moving to where they are more comfortable. Online is that place and not’s because the traditional media was bad.
Where the trouble has come is the slow pace of adaption by traditional media of the online space. In essence, they have created their own troubles by waiting too long and having to react to this paradigm shift rather than help mold it.

Traditional media, for the most part, missed a golden opportunity. Why did they miss it? I think it was because they were getting fat and happy by being unchallenged at the top of the media heap for too long. At that point you can lose your edge. They have simply lost their edge. With businesses being run by human beings this will happen. Most people want to go into cruise control when things are going well but they unfortunately lose focus at that point and are vulnerable to being replaced.

Since I am part of the ‘new media’ side of the coin it’s easy to lob criticism at the traditional side of the media. The trouble with that is that I then become no better and could very well suffer the same consequences.

For new media to really thrive we have to stay on top of the issues that face our industry as well. The primary one that I see is maintaining a high level of quality. With content farms churning out content that is more of a crapshoot with regards to quality this can end up being trouble.

If enough readers and content consumers get burned they will look elsewhere for information. Delivery methods may change but quality never goes out of style. Right now, the online publishing world needs to be very vigilant regarding the state of the quality of content. There’s plenty of talk but little action and as the content farm mentality gains momentum the window of opportunity to take this problem by the horns is closing very rapidly.

Could the online space suffer a similar fate to the offline space? Could the proliferation of lower quality content create enough discontent amongst content consumers that they will look elsewhere? Of course, where are they going to look, back to the offline space? Not necessarily but they may have less patience thus making it hard for even online entities to keep advertisers interested.

So what’s your take?

  • The trick for organizations whose intent is to provide quality, ethical news coverage is to stay focused on providing the goods while at the same time staying on top of the latest technologies to deliver the product to the consumer. I think the methods of introducing people to ethical, internet news-gathering operations will sharpen and thousands of new aps for devices like the iPad will flourish to assist folks in wading through online news providers.

    • Anis

      By the blessing of internet we can by any type of product when we are at home as well as sell. The type of your business you have no matter, Internet presence is the success mantra in the 21st century. Everyday, people are in search of good products and services, just like yours. There is an another website where you can by and sell

  • Cynthia

    I started out as a magazine writer, transitioned to the web during the big boom – saw all those websites go out of business and now, thanks to blogging – I’m back to making a living on the web.

    As a writer, the idea of going back to magazines scares me. Pitch letters, 3 month lead times, and since I was writing in the entertainment field, finding a story that wasn’t already old by publication date was tricky.

    I like the immediacy of the web. What I don’t like is the fact that everyone who has a free blog thinks they are a writer. Writing, journalism in this case, is an art and it’s becoming a lost art. The proliferation of pay-per-click article sites has driven the overall quality of journalism down. Sensationalist headlines with a You-Tube vid is now accepted as a “news” piece. And with the emphasis on SEO and Google trends, it’s getting harder and harder to find any creative work on the web.

    As for magazines, I recently subscribed to Wired and I’m really enjoying sitting down with it and reading it as entertainment, just as I would enjoy a DVD or TV show. I’m still getting my breaking news from Twitter, but I don’t think magazines are dead yet.

  • Online marketing will be changing but still leading the marketing industry and the traditional can only work wit hard copy newspaper.

  • The problem is that many are forgetting the fundamentals of journalism as they’re not being enforced by readers any more. Readers would rather have brevity/entertainment than research and even ethics…

  • Frank…Thank You…Good Information

    As someone involved with both online and traditional media, I have observed a couple of things over the last 12 months.

    First, I believe a larger percentage of the drop in traditional media is related to print media versus TV/Radio… Television still draws a great deal of attention. Most declines have more to to do with the economy versus people moving their attention from TV to the Internet. Second, you said the magic word – complacent. A word all of us should never forget. Thanks again for the reminder

  • Is anyone really reading all of this new content? I sometimes wonder if these browsers online are reading or just clicking.

  • Well written content is a key these days. This is especially the case as the website really is your shop window to represent who you are and what you do / sell. It needs to be clear and concise and able to be understood within seconds.